al-Hasani
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 14,060
- Reaction score
- 43
- Country
- Location
If there was not an Iran? Unthinkable for them. Iran is what gives them a sense of purpose, and something to rally against.
I think it works the other way around more than anything considering the fact that some Arabs changed Iran as an entity on so many fronts forever 1400 years ago.
It's the Iranian regime that is busy trying to act more "Arab" than the Arabs themselves. It's the Iranian regime that meddles all over the Arab world. It's the Iranian regime that tries to champion the Palestinian cause while just 36 years ago Iran and Israel were allies.
Ironically in terms of migration then Iranians are also flooding UAE and other Arab countries while this never happens the other way around.
Unless you consider some Shia Arab "pigrilms" to Qom and Mashhad a few times a year for "migration".
Also it was your compatriot in this thread that started making false claims and including Arab countries when their governments have nothing to do with this and if they have it's just as much as the Iranian regime.
When did I say ISIS is only KSA or Arab's fault? My answer was directed to @Aslan who said we are responsible for this, but I merely mentioned number of fighters that join them from both Iran and other Arab states as one aspect of the situation, not generalizing the whole mess to one country or group.
Last time I checked @Aslan wrote that all parties are responsible which I also wrote. You did not write that. You tried making up false numbers and blaming the "other party" solely while denying your own involvement in the region (hardly considered positive) etc.
You don't for once think that the genocide in Syria and Al-Maliki's failed and sectariian policies to a great extent have a lot to say about the breeding ground for groups like ISIS and their counterparts (Shia militia now abducting any suspcious Sunni and killing them in Baghdad, Basra etc.)?
Last edited: