ISI-Maoist link: Accused an extortionist

[Spring Onion]

Nepal: Export of fake currency | Indian Defence Review

Here you will find one...

But you did not answer my question!!

Indian defence review headed by Bharat Verma the idiot who says an Unstable Pakistan is in best favour of India

 

[xyz]

Indian defence review headed by Bharat Verma the idiot who says an Unstable Pakistan is in best favour of India

and you answer my question.

 

[gurjot]

Indian defence review headed by Bharat Verma the idiot who says an Unstable Pakistan is in best favour of India

think deeply what he wanted to say?.he meant ,dont destablize pk too much so that india get destablize,due to unstablized neighbour

 

[Spring Onion]

and you answer my question.

Which question ??

 

[Spring Onion]

think deeply what he wanted to say?.he meant ,dont destablize pk too much so that india get destablize,due to unstablized neighbour

I hope you are not his secretary to cover up his blundering BS.

Do read his paper for the same publication where he clearly suggested and also ways to destabilise Pakistan

 

[xyz]

Jana is refraining her self, to answer a simple question, why ISI approached Maoists. May be she should ask Hmid Gul or that Around the world traveler Zaid Hamid .. for the answer.

 

[xyz]

I hope you are not his secretary to cover up his blundering BS.

Do read his paper for the same publication where he clearly suggested and also ways to destabilise Pakistan

According to you Bharat Verma is an Idiot, or that from Indian defense page, so its a nonsense, hence destabalizing Pakistan by India is also nonsense. So please do not quote from the page.

Kindly answer my Question this is the 3rd or 4th time i am asking to you..
why ISI approached to Maoists???

 

[Spring Onion]

Jana is refraining her self, to answer a simple question, why ISI approached Maoists. May be she should ask Hmid Gul or that Around the world traveler Zaid Hamid .. for the answer.

Lolzz i know much more than you and for your information We never approach Moaists as there are so many other means and actors who are already doing what has to be done by a rival or an enemy.

 

[xyz]

Lolzz i know much more than you and for your information We never approach Moaists as there are so many other means and actors who are already doing what has to be done by a rival or an enemy.

Haha
okey, thanks for accepting.
I trust you for that, but there is a Problem, Prachanda said something else though its quite old.

Nepalnews.com Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd.

 

[xyz]

self deleted

 

[Spring Onion]

Haha
okey, thanks for accepting.
I trust you for that, but there is a Problem, Prachanda said something else though its quite old.

Nepalnews.com Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd.

Prachanda said something else and Indian Orange minds have twisted it to something suites Indian diatribe.


here is what Prachanda said according to the link you posted.

"When we initiated the armed movement against the corrupt rule in Nepal (in 1996)," Prachanda said, "ISI-type people offered us money and arms assistance. I resisted and our council agreed to refuse the assistance because we felt our movement would lose its Nepali-people-centric approach," Prachanda said, explaining his reasons for turning down such assistance. nepalnews.com sd Nov 19 06

So what is ISI TYPE people ??????? where he had claimed that ISI had approached him ?????


On the other hand read this entire piece lolzz he has tried his level best to accuse the Royal family and at the same time he claims the with Maoists coming into power, anti-India activities have been controlled .

So either Maoists in Nepal are funded by India as they are your groupies or you are making up un-digestible lies

 

[Ras]

Thats their headache and they need to take whatever action they deemed fit to tackle North East Insurgencies. Linking the decade-old Maoist, Naxal insurgency with ISI or China is outlandish and will only make it a separatist movements.

The problem is that Indians failed to take up economic, peaceful steps for its solution as well as failed to initiate any military action.


They have to pick either of these instead of blaming outsiders

They are all different things...the NE insurgencies have nothing to do with the Naxal issue. Most NE insurgencies are separatist in nature. That is easy enough to tackle with brutal force as the masses tend to rally behind the government.

The Naxals are a different kettle of fish..they are a non-separatist movement. They do not want independence or autonomy or anything like that. They want to change the economic policies of the govt.The problem with the Indian govt is that a lot of people even in the cities like the Naxals. The only way to turn the masses against the Naxals is to label them as having a link with separatist or outside India entities.This will allow the Indian govt to do what they have always wanted to do..use the army.

 

[Tshering22]

They are all different things...the NE insurgencies have nothing to do with the Naxal issue. Most NE insurgencies are separatist in nature. That is easy enough to tackle with brutal force as the masses tend to rally behind the government.

The Naxals are a different kettle of fish..they are a non-separatist movement. They do not want independence or autonomy or anything like that. They want to change the economic policies of the govt.The problem with the Indian govt is that a lot of people even in the cities like the Naxals. The only way to turn the masses against the Naxals is to label them as having a link with separatist or outside India entities.This will allow the Indian govt to do what they have always wanted to do..use the army.

Actually the citizens want the Indian Army to come into action dude. We've been saying it more number of times than our media shows to cull these @#$%^&*! and rid southeast of terrorism. It is the yellow-bellied mongrels in the Ministry and hand-in-glove top brass who are not interested in defending the country's democratic structure.

Those involved with Maoists are selfish money-makers guaranteed un-questioned power once the Maoist commie scum take the top seat in India. Since we cannot question these low lives as is common in Communist countries they will get lion's share of national wealth to enjoy.

Every single Indian is prepared to fight these bloody Maoists. The general problem with Indians is not liking of the Maoists:

An Indian only thinks about his family, kids, himself and not for the country. This selfish attitude of our masses is what continues to keep the country's troubles alive.

 

[xyz]

Prachanda said something else and Indian Orange minds have twisted it to something suites Indian diatribe.


here is what Prachanda said according to the link you posted.





So what is ISI TYPE people ??????? where he had claimed that ISI had approached him ?????


On the other hand read this entire piece lolzz he has tried his level best to accuse the Royal family and at the same time he claims the with Maoists coming into power, anti-India activities have been controlled .

So either Maoists in Nepal are funded by India as they are your groupies or you are making up un-digestible lies

You ask him who is this ISI type people, and finally Paras had links with Dawood Ibrahim. He would be knowing. Who are these ISI type people so close to Dawood Ibrahim. And who are these ISI type people who hijacked the Indian Airlines air craft in Nepal.
Also ask him why Not KGB or Mossad or CIA type people???

 

[xyz]

go through this also ...

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Pakistan 'offered aid' to Maoists