What's new

ISI man on Delhi ‘suicide op’ is martyr on Pak Army’s website

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is really weird... as stated by many members this might be a data entry error, details like these r not for public domain.....
 
.
If there was no such act happened in New Dehli during that period as i have proved in my links previously the person if he was there should not have died !

Lets say if the operation if ever was carried out was unsuccessful and he was taken to hospital even then the Indian media would have investigated a Pakistani man dead in an Indian hospital trying to blow some stuff up !

But there is not mentioning of such a thing even in the Indian Media - so what does that mean ?

In my assumption it can be a data entry error.

How can I explain this in clearer words? Have you read what is listed as "cause of shahadat"? It mis-spells Nephrotic syndrome and therefore must be assumed to be a natural death under most cases.

You're stuck with Indian-media-did-not-report-this. That would require that Indian media coming to know that a Pakistani guy died in some weird circumstances. Your statements require that his identity becoming known to the media and having had died in failed bombing/suspicious circumstances. The "operation" listed as "suicide attack" does not mean he died after having blown himself up (successfully or unsuccessfully). If, and I mean "if" he was undercover and died after contracting an illness as the cause lists, then it's not surprising that he would've merely been seen as an ordinary man without any wali whose body ends up in a morgue. Nobody reports on the dozens of unclaimed bodies at hospitals everyday.

And I should repeat this, we're assuming this isn't a big mess up on part of the people responsible for data entry.
 
.
its a 1 big typo.... .
theres nothing like NEPTRROTIC syndrome its NEPHROTIC syndrome..seems like DE Operator to blame ... :pakistan:
 
.
If there was no such act happened in New Dehli during that period as i have proved in my links previously the person if he was there should not have died !

Lets say if the operation if ever was carried out was unsuccessful and he was taken to hospital even then the Indian media would have investigated a Pakistani man dead in an Indian hospital trying to blow some stuff up !

But there is not mentioning of such a thing even in the Indian Media - so what does that mean ?

In my assumption it can be a data entry error.
See its written on their website, now if they explain it away with a hacker's attempt that is going on these days thats another thing, however, otherwise people who talk can come up with any story.

Zulfiqar sahab was sent to bomb.

There was a problem the bomb blew up, he died getting treatment.

Story banana konsi mushkil baat hai. It's a very big blunder, even if its a DE error
 
.
even if we have operatives in India for such operations(which i think there are,as this is how not only ISI but every intelligence agency operates),PA will never accept and specially put names on its website. This is probably a mistake.The only plausible story i can think of is something like:

This guy got injured in a Suicide Attack

Later during treatment got Nephrotic Syndrome or was already suffering from it but this disease finally got diagnosed.

Was taken to India for treatment where he died.

I am not a doctor so cannot comment on whether being injured in a bomb blast can somehow cause this disease like some kind of infection or something.

can anyone confirm?
 
.
How can I explain this in clearer words? Have you read what is listed as "cause of shahadat"? It mis-spells Nephrotic syndrome and therefore must be assumed to be a natural death under most cases.

You're stuck with Indian-media-did-not-report-this. That would require that Indian media coming to know that a Pakistani guy died in some weird circumstances. Your statements require that his identity becoming known to the media and having had died in failed bombing/suspicious circumstances. The "operation" listed as "suicide attack" does not mean he died after having blown himself up (successfully or unsuccessfully). If, and I mean "if" he was undercover and died after contracting an illness as the cause lists, then it's not surprising that he would've merely been seen as an ordinary man without any wali whose body ends up in a morgue. Nobody reports on the dozens of unclaimed bodies at hospitals everyday.

And I should repeat this, we're assuming this isn't a big mess up on part of the people responsible for data entry.

See its written on their website, now if they explain it away with a hacker's attempt that is going on these days thats another thing, however, otherwise people who talk can come up with any story.

Zulfiqar sahab was sent to bomb.

There was a problem the bomb blew up, he died getting treatment.

Story banana konsi mushkil baat hai. It's a very big blunder, even if its a DE error


Friends the main issue here is how the hell this operation if ever was to be carried out ended up on Pakistan Army website which is not run by GHQ but ISPR.

The issue is this particular entry on this specific website and we all have our own say on this.

Some of the assumptions above sound like "Imran series" which in real life are hard to believe.

We must wait until a clarification comes out from ISPR and i am sure it wont be a long wait for us.

All of us are surprised as it is very much weird for the details of such an operation (& i am not saying for a minute that it did happen) to be disclosed on the website.

Personally i assume it to be a data entry error or an Hack attempt as if the operative died because of Nephrotic syndrome the ISPR just simply could have written "Surveillance" as the nature of operation not a suicide attack , someone has to be a Lunatic to write such a thing online.
 
.
Personally i assume it to be a data entry error or an Hack attempt as if the operative died because of Nephrotic syndrome the ISPR just simply could have written "Surveillance" as the nature of operation not a suicide attack , someone has to be a Lunatic to write such a thing online.

Exactly BB. :tup:
 
.
May be they calling spying mission as suicide op in ememy country?
 
. .
Pak owning 'suicide bomber' makes its intentions clear: Army Chief

NEW DELHI: Army Chief General V K Singh on Tuesday said the "intentions and ways" of Pakistan army have "become clear" with it owning up a 'suicide bomber', who died in India, as one of its soldiers on its website.

"I have nothing to say on what they (Pak army) has put up on its website. But if it has (owned up), then it clearly show what their intentions and ways are and what their next move will be," Singh told reporters here on the sidelines of an Army function here.

Singh met with school children from Jammu and Kashmir, who came visiting Delhi as part of the Army's 'Op Sadhbhavana' movement, to win the hearts of the people of Kashmir.

"All I can say is we have to be more alert and only then we can protect the people and our troops," he said when asked what he thought of Pakistan army sending 'suicide bombers' to India.

"We have tried our best (to prevent infiltration). We are trying to stop infiltration. We will be alert on all fronts," he added.

Pakistan army's website named Zulfikar Ahmed as an ISI agent, who was on a suicide attack mission in India and had died in the city's Ganga Ram Hospital on November 16, 2007.

The website Pakistan Army also claimed that Ahmed was a 'Naik' in the 'Engineers' arm of the army and his formation was 'Headquarters 30 Corps/Directorate General ISI'.

It had a few days ago listed the army men who were killed in the war with India over their Kargil intrusions in 1999, thereby owning up that it had carried out the clandestine operation.

Read more: Pak owning 'suicide bomber' makes its intentions clear: Army Chief - The Times of India Pak owning 'suicide bomber' makes its intentions clear: Army Chief - The Times of India
 
. . . .
take the issue to world community and time to work hard for our Diplomats.

I think our government doing their best regarding to this issue

And half of our work they are doing by their self .... first musharafs statement on presence in J&K and now this :D
 
.
now it's too late.top secret data has been opened now.

That was a joke. Do you not think ISI would have checked it out way earlier then Me and You. :hitwall:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom