ISI involved in 26/11, chief Pasha told CIA shortly after attacks: Book

[mjnaushad]

OFFTOPIC.....

Dont you find strange that we ban someone and soon a new guy joins the discussion......

 

[TicTacToe]

Obama- United States of America's President. ( for reference)

Are there people on who do not know even that?

 

[Spring Onion]

Its not a fairy tale book for kids where something like that will be written.

Its a book about Obama and it requires "little sense" that nothing without a credible backing will be written on a book of that stature.

Obama- United States of America's President. ( for reference)

ok if you say so. You can believe in it and get some sympathy

ISI can give sympathy to Indian wounded pride anytime but earning jealousy is only the domain of ISI, India will have to compete for it

The last time we checked there has been no such history about having any psycho as our intelligence chief unlike India hence the quote is unbelievable

 

[TicTacToe]

People are talking and reacting as if that book is only meant for Indian readers.

They see Indian conspiracies in that book too..

For God's sake we have nt yet reached that position as to influence a book written about Obama's war..

Dont give us unwanted credits .

People see what they want to see and not what the author wants them to see!

 

[SpArK]

ok if you say so. You can believe in it and get some sympathy

ISI can give sympathy to Indian wounded pride anytime but earning jealousy is only the domain of ISI, India will have to compete for it

The last time we checked there has been no such history about having any psycho as our intelligence chief unlike India hence the quote is unbelievable

Naaa

We did ask for any book or sympathy from its author.

Thank god You didnt say that writer is from manipur or Orissa.


And what was the name of Psycho intelligence chief of India..


get the name.. go google.. fasttttt......

 

[TicTacToe]

ok if you say so. You can believe in it and get some sympathy

Synpathy? What makes you think we need sympathy, least of all from you? Ohh and please don't jump saying "CWG".

The last time we checked there has been no such history about having any psycho as our intelligence chief unlike India hence the quote is unbelievable

Kindly cite examples for the bolded part. By the way, even if our intelligence guys are psychos, at least those who control them are not, can you say that about your country?

 

[Spring Onion]

Naaa

We did ask for any book or sympathy from its author.

.

you are banking on it

 

[SpArK]

you are banking on it

The news came only today and u are saying we are banking on it...

what a comedy .... and a tragedy..

 

[Bang Galore]

Robert Upshur "Bob" Woodward (born March 26, 1943) is regarded as one of America's preeminent investigative reporters and non-fiction authors. He has worked for The Washington Post since 1971 as a reporter, and is currently an associate editor of the Post. While a young reporter for The Washington Post in 1972, Woodward was teamed up with Carl Bernstein; the two did much, but not all, of the original news reporting on the Watergate scandal. These scandals led to numerous government investigations and the eventual resignation of President Richard Nixon. Gene Roberts, the former executive editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer and former managing editor of The New York Times, has called the work of Woodward and Bernstein "maybe the single greatest reporting effort of all time

Woodward made crucial contributions to two Pulitzer Prizes won by The Washington Post. First he and Bernstein were the lead reporters on Watergate and the Post won the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 1973.[5]

Woodward also was the main reporter for the Post's coverage of the September 11 attacks in 2001. Ten stories won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting[6] – "six carrying the familiar byline of Bob Woodward," noted the New York Times article announcing the awards.[7]

He has been a recipient of nearly every other major American journalism award, including the Heywood Broun award (1972), Worth Bingham Prize for Investigative Reporting (1972 and 1986), Sigma Delta Chi Award (1973), George Polk Award (1972), William Allen White Medal (2000), and the Gerald R. Ford Prize for Reporting on the Presidency (2002).

Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard called Woodward "the best pure reporter of his generation, perhaps ever."[8] In 2003, Albert Hunt of The Wall Street Journal called Woodward "the most celebrated journalist of our age." In 2004, Bob Schieffer of CBS News said, "Woodward has established himself as the best reporter of our time. He may be the best reporter of all time

 

[Gandhi]

This message is for them who were part of such crime and those who are helping them by blocking and debating against the facts. Even if the content of the book is not authentic or it is, everyone should note the heinous crime against humanity. Those people who are responsible should see what have they contributed for themselves, for their people, and the humanity at large by doing so.

My message to them is to use their intelligence, energy in positive activities rather than such destructive work. PLEASE CHANGE and stop wasting such resourceful people. (I am hoping that they are reading this)

 

[SMC]

When it comes to ISI and PA:

1. Indians lie
2. Americans lie
3. British including more or less the entire western world lies.


Well...pretty much everyone other than Pakistanis lies.

Wait, India + parts of US + parts of UK = the whole world? If I do the math, that's less than 20% of the world.

More importantly, since many people believe something, it must be true, right? Hmm, how many times have I heard that from an Indian. Kid, if you were to use these kind of arguments in a class that teaches you how to write arguments, you'd get a flat out 0.

What you need is evidence. Argumentum ad populum won't solve that problem, nor will it show that what you're saying is true.

 

[SMC]

The amount of such theories (conspiracy or real) that are popping up all across the world these days implicating Pakistani individuals or organizations in terrorist activities, it almost seems like a good idea for Pakistan to create a ministry to manage the denials for these theories..

"Denial" isn't the correct word, since if one is in denial, it implies that counter-evidence to one's belief is overwhelming.

 

[SMC]

propaganda + orange media+conspiracy

What point are you trying to make with that statement? Like what does your statement show? Does it show that since many people may call it conspiracy or propaganda, that the story must be true? Or if people question the lack of the evidence supporting this statement, they must be conspiracy theorists (which would be quite ironic btw, since the conspiracy theorists here are...)?

 

[silent hill]

pasha told CIA but the millions of pakistanis here are thinking from the start that how the attacks happened in the first and who are the real faces behind, while india is mumbling like a moron to blame it on pakistan, pakistani govt though initially accepting it, denied all evidences afterwards, so i guess mumbai attack was just a bollywood version of 9/11, mysteries and more baffling mystries

 

[SMC]

Its not a fairy tale book for kids where something like that will be written.

Its a book about Obama and it requires "little sense" that nothing without a credible backing will be written on a book of that stature.

Obama- United States of America's President. ( for reference)

So your overall conclusion is that since it is written in that book, and even though it has no evidence, it must be true, because the book has a big name and must somehow have credibility to it?

So tomorrow, Musharraf decides to write a book saying that India is supporting terrorism in Pakistan, and even though he might have little evidence, since his book would be big, what it says must be true?

This is not how it works dude. If you make such a big claim, you must show some backing. Doesn't matter if you're a big name or not.