What's new

Is USA losing it's influence around the World?

MultaniGuy

BANNED
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
12,243
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
10 places around the world where US influence has plummeted

  • Dec. 9, 2017, 8:43 AM
  • 97,310
  • FACEBOOK
  • LINKEDIN
  • TWITTER
  • late 19th century.

    But in recent years, this power has been fading.

    From the South China Sea to the Middle East to Latin America, places where the US once comfortably exerted its economic, military, and political power are slowly beginning to slip out of America's grip, and often into China's. Although former President Barack Obama initiated this trend in some regions through calculated disengagement, it has accelerated sharply under President Donald Trump.

    Here are 10 regions where US influence has faded most dramatically:

    View As: One Page Slides


    The South China Sea
    the-south-china-sea.jpg

    Chinese dredging vessels aiding in construction work near one of the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.Handout/US Navy via Reuters
    The strategic and oil-rich South China Sea is one of the most contested waterways in the world, and the US and its allies have competed with China for control of it for years. While the Obama administration took a tough stance on the issue and even forced China to back down from further expansion in the area in 2016, the Trump administration has instead pursued other priorities.

    While on his trip to Asia this month, Trump articulated a largely incoherent policy on the South China Sea together with Vietnam and Philippines, but focused mainly on trade and North Korea. As a result, China has had a much freer hand in asserting its dominance in the region, and has expanded military bases, strengthened missile shelters, and built up small reefs into developed islands from which it can project its maritime influence — all to the detriment of US power in the area.

    Vietnam and China recently reached an agreement on the sea, and China's foreign minister indicated it was a sign that the countries in the region did not trust the US anymore to resolve such disputes.

    The Pacific
    the-pacific.jpg

    A Japanese flag flies in Yokohama as cargo ships come into port. Access to Japanese markets was one of the incentives for the US to stay in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.Yuriko Nakao/Reuters
    The US has long had a powerful military and economic presence in the Pacific, and Obama had hoped to create even closer ties between the US and east Asia through the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The controversial agreement was also seen as an effort to counter expanding Chinese trade power in the region.

    In one of his first moves in office, though, Trump decided to pull the US out of the agreement. In response, the remaining 11 countries that signed onto the TPP formed their own pact without the US earlier this month, cutting the US out of potentially profitable export opportunities and diminishing its influence along the crucial Pacific Rim.

    "It's a huge setback for the United States," Deborah Elms, the executive director of the Asian Trade Center, told Voice of America. "If you are an exporter this is deeply damaging."

    US Ambassador to the Asian Development Bank Robert Orr agreed.

    "When Trump abdicated TPP and then told regional nations to go on their own as the US would, it was inevitable that a new formulation of TPP would emerge not only without American leadership, but also without even an American presence," he said.

    The Philippines
    the-philippines.jpg

    Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte (L) with Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) in October 2016.Mikhail Klimentyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP
    America's deep historical ties to the Philippines stretch back to the 1898 Spanish-American War, when the US acquired the islands from Spain. Since then, the US has maintained bases in the Philippines, and has enjoyed immense cultural and political influence on the islands.

    But since his election last year, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has taken a hardline against the US, and has vowed to kick US troops out of the country "within the next two years." He has also insulted the US on numerous occassions, calling it "lousy," and said the Philippines do not need the US.

    Duterte has softened his anti-American stance in recent months largely because of the joint Philippine-US operations to oust Islamist fighters from the southern city of Marawi, and has said that he would honor existing military agreements the Philippines have with the US and will upgrade bases as necessary.

    Nevertheless, he has still criticized the quality of US equipment being given to the Philippines to fight the extremists, and has received arms shipments from Russia and China. And perhaps most importantly, support for the US in the Philippines has dropped significantly, all while approval for China has grown.

    Turkey
    turkey.jpg

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (L) with then-secretary of state John Kerry (R) in Washington, DC, in May 2013.Alex Wong/Getty Images
    Along with Israel, Turkey has been considered the most reliable US ally in the Middle East for decades, and has been a crucial member of the NATO alliance since 1952.

    Yet few of America's ally relationships have become as strained as the one with Turkey in recent years. Peeved by America's escalating diplomatic chastisement of its authoritarian President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the US's continued support for Kurds in Syria, Turkey has diverged from the US on numerous regional issues.

    On natural gas imports, the war in Syria, and Kurdish independence, Turkey has turned to Russia and Iran for support as a direct result of friction with the US.

    A scrapped weapons shipment to Turkey, a refusal to extradite anti-Erdoğan preacher Fethullah Gülen from the US, and Erdoğan's own refusal to pander to American and European liberal norms have all contributed to a rapid decline in America's influence in the country, which now sees its NATO membership as increasingly unnecessary.

    Africa
    africa.jpg

    A billboard advertising Teda City, a Chinese-built "industrial" city in northern Egypt, in 2016.Amr Dalsh/Reuters
    As the African continent continues to emerge as a region ripe for investment, the US has fallen behind its rivals, and its lack of influence over African politics has been painfully apparent in its failure to control the South Sudan crisis, provide security in east Africa, and tamp down on extremism across the continent.

    China in particular has stepped up to the plate in Africa, and the value of its investments on the continent outweigh America's by a factor of 10. While the Obama administration had at least tried, unsuccessfully, to expand its reach in Africa from a security standpoint, the Trump administration, which has slashed foreign aid funding, has been "asleep at the wheel" according to Democratic Sen. Tom Daschle. Other officials like former US representative to the African Union Reuben Brigety, agree.

    "The most disturbing thing is they are looking beyond us at this point," Brigety told US News and World Report. "As [African countries] are getting their act increasingly together… They are no longer waiting for us to figure out what we may be doing."

    While Americans and Europeans often viewed Africa from a security lens, the Chinese have used state-owned corporations to entrench China's geopolitical influence on the continent through industrial, infrastructure, and mining projects.

    Latin America
    latin-america.jpg

    Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro (R) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) in Beijing in 2015 Pool/Getty Images
    The US has also increasingly become outpaced by China in Latin America, right in the US's backyard.

    As the US has devoted its attention to other regions of the world, China has stepped in to fill the void economically, and has now replaced the US as the main trading partner of regional giants like Peru, Venezuela, Brazil, and Argentina. Militarily, China has also been angling itself as a weapons provider in Latin America, and its developing Pacific navy may well come to play a role in Pacific South America in years to come.

    Following years of American involvement, the countries of Latin America formed a new international group called the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) that excludes the US and Canada — and instead of meeting on the American continent, CELAC held a major conference in Beijing in 2015, according to CNN Money.

    Evan Ellis, a Latin American expert and professor at the US Army War College, told CNN that like in other parts of the world, China is offering investment and trade benefits with no strings attached.

    "China provides a source of financing and export markets without pressures to adhere to practices of transparency, open markets, and Western style democracy," Ellis said.

    All of this is very appealing to Latin American countries like Venezuela, among others.

    Europe
    europe.jpg

    A gas pipeline runs near Donetsk, Ukraine from Russia to the European Union, 2015.Andrew Burton/Getty Images
    When the US passed a new sanctions bill against Russia this past July, it included a clause that said Congress could also levy sanctions against companies that worked on Russian export pipelines — and the Germans, whose companies are planning to do just that on the Russian-German Nord Stream 2 pipeline, erupted in protest.

    President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, said the EU was prepared to retaliate economically against the US for the moves.

    The diplomatic awkwardness on the energy issue reflects an increasing distance Germany and the European Union have felt toward the US ever since the Obama years — Europeans' trust of the US has fallen by more than half since 2009, and more recently, politicians in western Europe have complained about Trump's refugee policy.

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel summed up Europe's increasing distance from the US in May of this year.

    "The times in which we could completely depend on others are on the way out. I've experienced that in the last few days" she said. "We Europeans truly have to take our fate into our own hands."

    The Arab Middle East
    the-arab-middle-east.jpg

    A missile fired by Iran's Revolutionary Guard from Iran toward Islamic State targets in Syria in June 2017.Morteza Fakhrinejad/IRIB News Agency via AP
    In 2009, Obama made a sweeping speech in Cairo that promised a new future for the Middle East, and especially for the Arab nations that make up its core. At the height of the Arab Spring two years later, it seemed like the US had committed itself to use its power in the region to advance Arab democratic interests.

    Yet in 2017, from Iraq in the east to Lebanon and Jordan in the west, it is no secret that US influence in the Arab Middle East is at historic lows. Iranian regional dominance in the Fertile Crescent and Yemen, instability in Saudi Arabia, and the continuing appeal of Islamism over Western liberalism all mean that America's ability to direct politics in the region has become seriously undermined.

    After decades of American interventionism in the Arab Middle East that have borne little fruit, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani recently stated that if Trump withdraws from the Iran nuclear deal, "no one will trust America again."

    However Arabs' distrust of the US has deeper causes than just American waffling on deals like the one with Iran — Obama's inaction on Syria, which many Arabs saw as a betrayal, along with America's continued singular focus on stamping out terrorism in the region have dampened hopes that the US has ever had the best interests of Arabs in mind.

    As a result, many former US allies in the region have fallen into Russia's embrace.

    Mainland southeast Asia
    mainland-southeast-asia.jpg

    A logo at the entrance to a joint industrial zone between China and Thailand east of Bangkok in 2016.Chaiwat Subprasom/Reuters
    The US has long strived to maintain influence on the southeast Asian mainland, perhaps most directly through the Vietnam War, and has frequently served as a bulwark in the region against China.

    This bulwark seems to be weakening though, and China has been rapidly supplanting US influence throughout the region by investing heavily where Americans will not. While in past decades human rights and democracy had to be cultivated in Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Malaysia for the US to do business there, with Trump stepping back and downplaying the importance of human rights on his recent Asia trip, southeast Asian nations have been given a freer hand — and in many cases have turned to China as a partner instead due to its strategic economic know-how.

    China has long sought deeper involvement in the affairs of countries in its own backyard, and America's disengagement on issues like the South China Sea have allowed it to unilaterally extend political and economic influence over southeast Asian countries on the mainland.

    Among locals though, Chinese influence isn't necessarily a good thing. A recent survey conducted from Singapore showed that 70% ofsSoutheast Asians see US influence as positive for regional stability, however 51% also stated that the US had lost power in the region to China since Trump took office.

    Pakistan
    pakistan.jpg

    A banner of Chinese President Xi Jinping (center) flanked by Pakistan's President Mamnoon Hussain (L) and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (R) during Xi's visit marking the launch of the construction of an economic corridor in Pakistan in May, 2017.B.K. Bangash/AP
    The US and Pakistan have been ardent alliesthroughout the Cold War and into the War on Terror, but recent political differences and the growing influence of China in the country have strained American power in the south Asian country.

    Already under pressure from the US for its ties to the Taliban, the Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence's corruption and potential connections to terrorist groups, and Pakistan's alleged dishonesty on late Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden's whereabouts, the relationship has been damaged further by the US cozying up to India, which has accelerated in recent months.

    Pakistan, which has been India's arch-rival since 1947, has instead turned to China, just like so many other tepid US allies around the world. Pakistan's top foreign policy advisor Sartaj Aziz indicated as much in June of this year.

    "Pakistan's relations with China are the cornerstone of our foreign policy," Aziz said.


    http://www.businessinsider.com/wher...ummeted-because-of-trump-2017-11/#pakistan-10
 
.
What turned a lot of leaders off the USA was the "friends to day" "enemies tomorrow" personality of USA foreign policy, the prime example was Runsfold hugging Saddam Hussein one day and then hanging him later. Also the USA has gotten too comfy with gunboat diplomacy with the "with us or against us" policy, which has had a lot of third world nodding in agreement whilst planning an exit to the relationship.
 
.
US stock exchange also took a deep plunge few hours ago. Ffollowed by rumors of a minor recovery???
 
.
Trust and taking care of ally's interest are the most important to keep dominance in the world.


Unfortunately , american policy makers adopted BACK STABBING POLICY in the world.

With barrel of gun , you can not keep strategic partnerships for a long time and stabbing back again and again.

The US became super power by destruction policy and China is going to be super power with construction policy.
 
Last edited:
.
Define "American influence." :rolleyes:

For any country, well-being of its people comes first. POTUS Trump is in a better position to determine what is practical and what is not, for American economic ends in the long-term. He is a business man and a billionaire on top.

If NAFTA is not feasible for the US in the long-term, why should it stick to it for indefinite period? No deal is perfect and/or expected to last forever. Any deal that carry weight for a particular period of time, might become a liability in another period of time. There is always room for forging new relationships under the right set of circumstances. Dynamics of this world tend to change over time, for better or worse.

As long as American markets and business entities are flourishing, "American influence" is a constant.

American prestige is another matter altogether; it has taken a nosedive in recent years due to War On Terror and a few controversial decisions of POTUS Trump but nobody can ignore "American politics." It affects any country one way or the other, for better or worse.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom