What's new

Is US trying to create another Ukraine in East Asia? Pelosi plans to Visit Taiwan

Nips like you should fart and not yawn.

What a load of NONSENSE?

The Potsdam Treaty was signed and agreed by the allies that included China to return all territories illegally seized and annexed by Japan back to their rightful owners. This included Korea, Taiwan.

But Diayutai was excluded due to a clerical error as later admitted by the US Government and when CPC won the civil war and PRC was established, the US choose to conveniently ignored it.

The milestone on the Diayutai island clearly stated 1895 and did not have any Japanese name until after its annexation that year. The same year Taiwan was annexed.

If dishonourable nip continue to advocate the blockage of the reunification of Taiwan then perhaps China should considered the whole reunification package to include Japan as well.

Do you like my suggestion?

How about giving the Okinawa Perfecture which was annexed by Meiji Japan back to the descendents of thw Kingdom of Ryuku?

He's not Japanese. He's a white weaboo. I'd probably just ignore him.

 
.
I suspect dollar is in real trouble so they want to create as much havoc as possible in the rest of the world.

You don't need to suspect. US government printed tons of dollars from 2020-22 to cover free money paid to its citizens. When the pandemic ends, these money will be all in the market, causing hyper inflation and therefore need to be jacked up their over-blown values. This is called exporting inflation to the world.
 
.
The day may come that Americans no longer think supporting the Nationalists Chinese during Second Sino-Japan War was worth it.
I dont know. Japanese government confer Curtis LeMay the First Order of Merit with the Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun for his excellent work of BBQ the entire tokyo. At least he think it worth it. :agree:
1649487135437.jpeg

 
.
The day may come that Americans no longer think supporting the Nationalists Chinese during Second Sino-Japan War was worth it.

You really think Americans helped China from the goodness of their hearts or was it about containing Japan's expansion?

Maybe you should look up Pearl Harbor before saying anymore stupid shit.
 
.
The US/anglo helped prop up Japan to attack Russia then go against Japan when it goes berserk in WW2.
The US support the KMT until the KMT is pushed out by Mao.
The US then support Mao/Deng to break 80s Japan and enlarge the Sino-Soviet split and attack Vietnam.
The US then back to support declining Japan to attack China.

The US never does anything out of morality, it's 100% divide and conquer, asian nationalists are stupid as hell for fighting their brothers while the US laugh.
 
.
You really think Americans helped China from the goodness of their hearts or was it about containing Japan's expansion?

Maybe you should look up Pearl Harbor before saying anymore stupid shit.

Where exactly did you get "from goodness of heart" in what I wrote?
 
.
Where exactly did you get "from goodness of heart" in what I wrote?

US helped China out of necessity to contain Japan, and now is pushing Japan as a containment against China. It was all about its self interests.

You act like it was some charity case that only the stupid or ignorant would say.
 
.
US helped China out of necessity to contain Japan, and now is pushing Japan as a containment against China. It was all about its self interests.

You act like it was some charity case that only the stupid or ignorant would say.

That's just your imagination or interpretation. Others can read for themselves.

Although on that topic, public sentiment is a factor.
 
.
That's just your imagination or interpretation. Others can read for themselves.

Although on that topic, public sentiment is a factor.

It's not imagination Weeaboo. It's a fact. US looks out only for its own interests, and it was advantageous for them to keep Japan in check during WWII with China as its ally.

Of course, brain damaged Weeaboo minds cannot understand this very basic rule of geopolitics.
 
.
It's not imagination Weeaboo. It's a fact. US looks out only for its own interests, and it was advantageous for them to keep Japan in check during WWII with China as its ally.

Of course, brain damaged Weeaboo minds cannot understand this very basic rule of geopolitics.
The US population sympathized with China following the Nanking Massacre and sentiment towards Japan took some notches downwards. Later through 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, the Nationalists Chinese diplomatic team would continue to appeal to the US for lines of credits and supplies whereas despite Japanese diplomatic efforts, they could not get off the track of worsening relations with the US which culminated in the oil embargo. Certainly the FDR administration was going to do what they wanted to do. But they are still limited to what they can do by public sentiment. Afterall, berfore Pearl Harbor, the FDR administration was most concerned about keeping GB alive and so was really interested in having a war with Germany than Japan. But US public sentiment was rather isolationists so the FDR administration couldn't get into direct war with Germany. The oil embargo was a life line control that the US had over Japan and so the FDR administration got its war with Germany via provoking Japan. This is all so more evident since despite Japan literally attacking PH, the FDR administration adopted a "Germany first" strategy.

So then consider an alternative where US public sentiment was different. Suppose they didn't care at all about the war on the China mainland. What if the US population, being rather anti-communist, kept in mind the Chinese communists in China and how they were not fully wiped out by 1936 and in fact snatched a second "united front" with the Nationalists via Xi'an incident. They maybe it could be seen as communism getting a lucky break in China and back on raise again on Nationalist tolerance for Chinese communists. If so, maybe US public sentiment would care less about the Nanking Massacre and conclude just better if Japanese than communism or incompetent Nationalists. Just end war in 1940.. and then back to normal with 1940 Olympics in Japan.

It's quite a mammoth what-if that's draws from US public sentiment.
 
.
The US population sympathized with China following the Nanking Massacre and sentiment towards Japan took some notches downwards. Later through 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, the Nationalists Chinese diplomatic team would continue to appeal to the US for lines of credits and supplies whereas despite Japanese diplomatic efforts, they could not get off the track of worsening relations with the US which culminated in the oil embargo. Certainly the FDR administration was going to do what they wanted to do. But they are still limited to what they can do by public sentiment. Afterall, berfore Pearl Harbor, the FDR administration was most concerned about keeping GB alive and so was really interested in having a war with Germany than Japan. But US public sentiment was rather isolationists so the FDR administration couldn't get into direct war with Germany. The oil embargo was a life line control that the US had over Japan and so the FDR administration got its war with Germany via provoking Japan. This is all so more evident since despite Japan literally attacking PH, the FDR administration adopted a "Germany first" strategy.

So then consider an alternative where US public sentiment was different. Suppose they didn't care at all about the war on the China mainland. What if the US population, being rather anti-communist, kept in mind the Chinese communists in China and how they were not fully wiped out by 1936 and in fact snatched a second "united front" with the Nationalists via Xi'an incident. They maybe it could be seen as communism getting a lucky break in China and back on raise again on Nationalist tolerance for Chinese communists. If so, maybe US public sentiment would care less about the Nanking Massacre and conclude just better if Japanese than communism or incompetent Nationalists. Just end war in 1940.. and then back to normal with 1940 Olympics in Japan.

It's quite a mammoth what-if that's draws from US public sentiment.
So in another words, US felt threatened by Japan's expansion and decided do something about it. Relationship with Japan was already deteriorating before Pearl Harbor. Thanks for conceding.
 
.
Despite what happens on Taiwan, China appears to be carful enough not to take the bait and engage in a war until it has reached economic and technological parity as well as enduring resilience.

If BRI and CPEC are to endure, China (and partners in the BRI like Pakistan) can not afford for China to be dragged into any war, because the strategy to counter BRI appears to be very similar (IMHO) to US strategy in Latin America between 1939-1949. With the UK playing the role Taiwan plays today, China playing Germany’s role, India playing Brazil’s role and Pakistan playing Argentina’s role.

India should be especially keen to see what happened to Brazil.

 
Last edited:
. .
Would be interesting to see the most intelligent and one of most civilized and disciplined people on earth to have a war with a spoiled, relatively low IQ, relatively barbaric and in-disciplined people.

The outcome of the war is obvious.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom