xuxu1457
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2009
- Messages
- 4,633
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
at least we show what happens in India without hiding any thing, you hide every thing with censorship and military regime, you only know the propaganda your commi govt feeds you, Chinese people are like chicken in the chicken farm who are fed with ready made poultry feed you don't know the reality out side the farm.
Chinese officials carry out continued atrocities in Tibet
The Chinese government has introduced a new policy that requires almost every monastery in Tibet to be under the direct rule of government officials
chinese use electric shocks on tibetan women
Tibetan Women Targeted by China’s Population Programme
Tibetan women struggle against China’s male-dominated state, characterise by deeply held racist convictions that operate a system of apartheid, reducing them to second-class citizenship in their own land. A commonly used Chinese term describing occupied people is shung-nu – ‘barbarian slave’. It is within China’s notorious population programme that women in Tibet face the most widespread human rights violations. Reports of this programme began emerging from Tibet in the early 1960s. It has resulted in unimaginable suffering for women across Tibet and China. Denied freedom of choice or control over their own bodies, women are forced, through a series of financial penalties, intimidation and other oppressive measures, to submit to population control.
The scale of human rights violations and the suffering of Tibetan and Chinese women is staggering; Dr Jonathan Aird, former senior China specialist at the US Bureau of the Census, estimated that between 1971 and 1985 alone there have been some 100 million coercive ‘birth control operations’, involving forced sterilisations and abortions (Aird, 1992). For Tibetans these population policies not only violate human rights principles, but form a dangerous and potentially disastrous assault upon an already severely diminished Tibetan population. Chinese population control abuses are now widely recognised, yet some demographers, presumably keen to maintain career links and/or research opportunities with China, choose to ignore the evidence of such violations. In Tibet and China, however, this is exactly what is happening, as the United Nations, governments, Britain’s Department for International Development and multilateral population agencies ignore the wealth of evidence of these abuses, muttering absurd arguments about China having a potential for change. This reasoning could equally have been applied to Nazi SS units which forcibly sterilised countless numbers of ‘racially inferior’ women across Europe. Those who defend China’s population control programmes are asking the world to accept something just as controversial and distasteful, to say nothing about the atrocities, the traumas, the terror and devastation inflicted upon women simply because ‘there is potential for improvement’.
There are several important considerations which must be taken into account when examining Chinese population control programmes in Tibet. It must be remembered that these programmes are part of a system of oppression forced upon a subject people of an independent nation under illegal occupation. It is a policy imposed by a colonial power through the act of military occupation. The resulting birth control programme has had a devastating impact on the Tibetan population, which, it is widely agreed, was around six million before China’s invasion in 1950. Since then, some 1.2 million Tibetans are thought to have perished through famine, disease, and in the ‘Twenty Year War’ of resistance (1954-74). A serious population low must thus have occurred in the 1960s, which meant that China forced its population programme upon an already dangerously reduced population level.
A woman campaigning for women’s freedom to bear children
It is significant that the population of Tibet makes up less than 1 per cent of China’s population. According to Chinese figures, Tibetans from the so-called Tibet Autonomous Region (a truncated region forming a third of Tibet proper) are just 0.2 per cent of China’s total population. It has been calculated that if the Tibetan population experiences an annual increase of 2.1 per cent (equivalent to the replacement rate), it would add just 0.3 per cent of China’s yearly population growth. Tibet has a land surface comparable in size to that of Western Europe, yet its population is less than that of Greater London. The Tibetan population has coexisted in balance with a resource-rich environment for several millennia. Taken together these facts make it impossible to accept arguments for any form of population control in Tibet.
Apart from employing dubious economic arguments to justify its population control programme, such as linking apparent rises in living standards for Tibetans with birth control policies, China also stresses the importance of ‘increasing the quality of the nation’. Since the Nazi obsession with eugenics, no state has attached so much importance to what has been comprehensively described as ‘the management and breeding for the purpose of improving stock’ (Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 1991).
Socially and biologically based eugenics has played a major role in China’s justification of its population programme, particularly since the official introduction of the one child policy in 1979. In 1989, China’s Gansu province (which contains large parts of annexed Tibetan territory) issued a mandatory sterilisation regulation ‘prohibiting reproduction by the mentally retarded’. China’s definition of what constitutes retardation includes having an IQ of less than 49, or ‘handicaps’ in ‘language, memory, orientation and thinking’. One is reminded of those certified as insane by the Nazi Criminal Biology Institute and sterilised on the basis that they held thoughts not in accord with Nazi ideology. In 1991, similar eugenics laws were adopted by at least five other provinces and Madame Peng Peyin, State Family Planning Minister, defended the forced sterilisation of all mentally handicapped people, whether or not their problem was hereditary (Kristof, 1991).
For Tibetans these laws are a chilling addition to the systematic assault upon their population. According to Xinhua (China’s News Agency), there are some 100,000 ‘handicapped’ people in Tibet who, under China’s eugenics laws, are considered ‘undesirable’. As with most Chinese euphemisms, the term ‘handicapped’ could mean many things and the interpretation is often left to family planning officials at regional and local levels. As a result, Tibetan women find themselves at the mercy of politically motivated decisions that result in mass sterilisation campaigns. Gansu Radio reported on 7 May 1990 that some 65,000 women and men have been sterilised in just two months (Moss, 1992). Deng Bihai, in an article for China’s Population News (1989), trumpeted in overtly racist tones the superiority of Han Chinese over ‘minority nationalities’. The article claimed that people such as the Tibetans are commonly “mentally retarded, short of stature, dwarves or insane” and on this basis, Deng urged no relaxation in the birth control programme.
Cultural Genocide
The recognition of the abuse involved in China’s population programme, and its racist and eugenic rationale, together with the fact that it has been forced upon a population already blighted by the loss of a million people, make it difficult to escape the conclusion that China is engaged in cultural genocide in Tibet. This genocidal programme is waged on Tibetan women’s bodies. It is impossible to see any other reason for population control other than the aim of reducing the Tibetan population to a dangerously low level. With the added pressure of China’s population transfer strategy, which means that Tibetans are becoming a minority in many areas of Tibet, Tibet faces the gravest crisis of survival in its history. In order to achieve this ‘Final Solution’, the rights of Tibetan women have been abolished by central mandate and they have no choice but to accept a position which renders them servile to the Chinese state. As one Buddhist nun has commented: “In Tibet we have no rights, not even over our bodies.”
，next please change a picture, the picture in your post is Nepal Police，China's police or army never wear such cloth and take Wooden sticks, only south Asia police take that, Nepal police:
India police:
