What's new

Is this the US Army next generation superchopper

nik141991

BANNED
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
616
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
India
Is this the US Army’s next generation 'superchopper'? Radical design has dual tilting blades and can travel at over 270mph
  • AVX design believed to be frontrunner to US Army contract
  • Uses two rotors to create lift, while fans propel it forward to reach 230 knots
  • Firm also developing civilian version of the helicopter
It could become the US Army's new 'superchopper' - able to transport troops, carry heavy goods and be fitted out as a flying gunship.

This futuristic helicopter from Texas firm AVX is the frontrunner to win a $100bn contract from the Pentagon for the next generation of attack helicopter.

It uses two rotors to create lift, while fans propel it forward to reach 230 knots.

article-0-1F5E1E5500000578-74_964x578.jpg


The AVX design offers the capabilities the Army wants for the future fleet of utility and attack aircraft at a very attractive price,' the firm, also called AVX, says.

'The AVX JMR aircraft has entry doors on both sides of the fuselage as well as a large rear ramp for easy cargo handling.
'Additionally it has retractable landing gear and the attack variant (see below) carries all armaments stored inside until needed which provides a “clean” aerodynamic design.

AVX has teamed with a number of experienced aerospace companies for development of the AVX JMR/FVL design.

'The teaming concept has allowed AVX to keep the cost of development and eventual production of the aircraft lower than those of other offerings while maintaining a high level of performance by the aircraft.'

The firm is among four vying for a $100bn contract for the Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator, and the firms are expected to begin a 'flyoff' contest in 2017.

article-0-1F5E1E8100000578-17_964x623.jpg


With this signing, the Army has taken a large step toward developing a new family of aircraft referred to as.

'This is a critical risk reducing effort for the Future Vertical Lift Family of Systems,' said Maj. Gen. William Crosby, Program Executive Officer for Aviation.

'The operational benefits and changes will depend on the capabilities we can deliver to the war fighter with FVL.

'Improved speed, range, reliability, and survivability are critical goals that we will target.'

The AVX, which could replace the Blackhawk, is what's known as a compact coaxial-rotor/ducted-fan concept.

It is made up of counter rotating rotors on top and twin ducted-fans in the rear of the aircraft, which eliminates the necessity of a tail rotor.

The coaxial-rotors creates lift, while the fans provide forward thrust to reach the 230 knots require by the U.S. Army for the Blackhawk replacement.

The concept also has small wings in the front of the aircraft that create additional lift.

The aircraft will weight 27,000lb (12,000kg), lift 13,000lb (5.900kg), and carry 12 combat troops plus 4 crew members

article-0-1F5E1E7A00000578-633_964x627.jpg


According to DefenceTalk, the AVX design is the frontrunner for the contest.

'AVX’s coaxial-rotor/ducted-fan concept increases efficiency in all aspects of flight, while reducing vibration,' it said.

'Out of all JMR concepts presented by the competing parties, none look as complete, practical, futuristic, and ready as AVX’s aircraft.

'It is thrilling to see how new ideas broad by a startup aircraft company, few people ever heard before, will stack-up against the arrogance of the U.S. defense establishment.'


http://www.dailymail.co.uk
 
. . . . . . . .
We're going to wait till Pakistan builds a really cool chopper and buy it from them.:rofl:
By the time this thing comes out, who knows? May be you might ;)

Still though, it looks viable, but does $100 billion really make the chopper worth it?
 
.
By the time this thing comes out, who knows? May be you might ;)

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting.

Still though, it looks viable, but does $100 billion really make the chopper worth it?

Worth it ? Probably not but this shit costs.
 
.
Americans are always being innovative. Who would've thought of such a simple yet effective design??
Friend, it's not a new concept.. being tried many times in 50s~70s.. ..
Few examples...
300px-Gyroplane-Laboratoire1.jpg
th

th
th
th
th




Russian answer..
th

Other American in race
th


MIssed one retired in 1973 .... qwith speed approx 500 KM/H
300px-Sik_S-69-1.jpg

There nothing new they have done same old wine (concept) in new bottle :D
 
.
Friend, it's not a new concept.. being tried many times in 50s~70s.. ..
Few examples...
300px-Gyroplane-Laboratoire1.jpg
th

th
th
th
th




Russian answer..
th

Other American in race
th
Well, i know that the double rotors used cancel out the destabilizing force from each other and this design isn't new but the twin fans/propellers on either side instead of the conventional turboshaft engine is new to me and makes a lot of sense to use.
 
.
Well, i know that the double rotors used cancel out the destabilizing force from each other and this design isn't new but the twin fans/propellers on either side instead of the conventional turboshaft engine is new to me and makes a lot of sense to use.

Pictures says it all.... lots of experiments were done by people from 1940 ~1975.. it was golden era of innovation in aviation domain. Unfortunately back then we did not have super computers and was hard to predict out come but hats off to designers/ engineers. They did something on drawing board which we find it difficult to emulate with latest computers and software.
 
.
Worth it ? Probably not but this shit costs.
I wouldn't hold my breath either, Pakistan is far from becoming independent, but it is thankfully make some good steps towards defense independence.

Of course it costs, but I think the US government has a hard time admitting that expensive isn't always better. Once cost outweighs the benefits, it must be dropped.
 
.
Sure it will. Look at the cartoon...............I mean video.:enjoy:

Dude, this design is not feasible.

Every Heli requires at least two rotors in order to balance Angular momentum but this alignment of rotors as shown in this Photoshop will cancel out lift along with Angular momentum.

You people would be better off developing V-22 type design.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom