What's new

Is Supreme Court's Contempt Charge Against Imran Khan Justified?

CJ Chaudhry follows his own biases and whims, not the constitution of Pakistan. He is corrupt PCO judge who turned against Musharraf only when he got caught abusing power to protect his incompetent and corrupt son who passed intermediate with a C grade, got into a medical school, and then got appointed and quickly promoted in govt jobs because of his father.

Arsalan+Iftikhar+Case.jpg


Haq's Musings: Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry Should Resign

No he is not that powerful as you portray him. :disagree:
There is a complete check and balance system in our constitution and there is an army of lawyers to protect it by all means.
And If there is slightly a hint of evidence against him you will see a mile line of lawyers next day to file petition against him. Point scoring and political grudges would not do any good.
 
Your argument is quite misleading. Next time try to be straight forward and to the point or else i will ignore you.
If this is so called monte carlo judiaciary and saudi backed democracy than after five years you will see the people have a choice to elect IK and maybe at that time his slogan would be to clean up judiciary and judicial system. And if the people vote for him he can surely do it with his executive powers. you are so blind to comprehend this little fact because it only happens in democratic systems not dictatorship.
Now tell me to whom the dictator is answerable to?
he will be answerable to his god! if you belive in god, not in any NOORA?
to wait 5 more years, so that another of fakhru bhai gets his job!
which is to bring fakly PPP back into power, under the dynamic leadership of BILLAWAL BHUTTO ZARDARI.?
so you meant that, peoples didnt voted for PTI this time, & with the same system & noora league,s absolute control on fedrl & punjab govt PTI can become victorious ? nice joke joker?
for your kind information, pakistan isnt is a west minster democracy, & it wont be even after 50 years more?
in pakistan peoples dont vote for slogans, they vote for 1000 ruppes?
thats what they needed the most,as they were made poor by the likes of croupt nooras & ppps to keep them in power, protected by monte carlo, sumo-moto croupt & paid judiciary?
sory keep your jokerish advices to yourself, & try to be hounrable to the seniors here?
understand joker!
 
No he is not that powerful as you portray him. :disagree:
There is a complete check and balance system in our constitution and there is an army of lawyers to protect it by all means.
And If there is slightly a hint of evidence against him you will see a mile line of lawyers next day to file petition against him. Point scoring and political grudges would not do any good.
come to the topic!
look at the topic, where he been discussed?
constitution of pakistan is just a pice of junk, which couldnt saved pakistan dividing into bangla desh?
for now its just crap paper, which croupt politicians usses for thier croupt practices only?
its outdated!
i mean for godsake briton still is running on unwritten constitution?
what happens to that lawyers movement joker?
where are its leaders. i mean ALI AHMED KURD & others?
it was all a paid noora movie sponsored by CIA through house of SAUDS!
it wont happen again, mark my words cause nobody wana finance fake inqlilabs in pakistan any more?
they are fed up cause they are the only ones lossing everything!
 
he will be answerable to his god! if you belive in god, not in any NOORA?
to wait 5 more years, so that another of fakhru bhai gets his job!
which is to bring fakly PPP back into power, under the dynamic leadership of BILLAWAL BHUTTO ZARDARI.?
so you meant that, peoples didnt voted for PTI this time, & with the same system & noora league,s absolute control on fedrl & punjab govt PTI can become victorious ? nice joke joker?
for your kind information, pakistan isnt is a west minster democracy, & it wont be even after 50 years more?
in pakistan peoples dont vote for slogans, they vote for 1000 ruppes?
thats what they needed the most,as they were made poor by the likes of croupt nooras & ppps to keep them in power, protected by monte carlo, sumo-moto croupt & paid judiciary?
sory keep your jokerish advices to yourself, & try to be hounrable to the seniors here?
understand joker!

Shitters can only **** and get **** in response...

We are talking about system made for this life not for afterlife.
:omghaha: :cuckoo:
 
he will be answerable to his god! if you belive in god, not in any NOORA?
to wait 5 more years, so that another of fakhru bhai gets his job!
which is to bring fakly PPP back into power, under the dynamic leadership of BILLAWAL BHUTTO ZARDARI.?
so you meant that, peoples didnt voted for PTI this time, & with the same system & noora league,s absolute control on fedrl & punjab govt PTI can become victorious ? nice joke joker?
for your kind information, pakistan isnt is a west minster democracy, & it wont be even after 50 years more?
in pakistan peoples dont vote for slogans, they vote for 1000 ruppes?
thats what they needed the most,as they were made poor by the likes of croupt nooras & ppps to keep them in power, protected by monte carlo, sumo-moto croupt & paid judiciary?
sory keep your jokerish advices to yourself, & try to be hounrable to the seniors here?
understand joker!

You look like a confused man that's why you put so many question marks in your posts. :undecided:
Take a brotherly advice and get some sleep.
 
Shitters can only **** and get **** in response...

We are talking about system made for this life not for afterlife.
:omghaha: :cuckoo:
you hve been reported for your offtopic & abusive comments!
but to clear that noora sh..t out your sh...ty mind!
this muslim state pakistan, with majority of muslims living as its citizens, any ruller dictator or not dictator, only can be judged by god, which he belives as a muslim, & if he dont belive in god, he will never leave anymone alive to judge him gulity!
its a simple equation which your, sh...ty noora mind, couldnt gets?
 
You look like a confused man that's why you put so many question marks in your posts. :undecided:
Take a brotherly advice and get some sleep.

reported again for offtopic,deraling of thread!
now read my lips, keep your noora sh..t in your head!
cause sh..t allways smells like you dear?
you dont know who you are up against!
come to topic, i am just here to knock all your dam noora sh..t , outa yoo head!
 
No he is not that powerful as you portray him. :disagree:
There is a complete check and balance system in our constitution and there is an army of lawyers to protect it by all means.
And If there is slightly a hint of evidence against him you will see a mile line of lawyers next day to file petition against him. Point scoring and political grudges would not do any good.

You are not answering the question which is: What happened to Arsalan corruption case? Why has it been buried while the CJP pursues others through suo moto? Why the double standard?

Haq's Musings: Pakistan's Familygate & Mediagate Scandals Broke on Youtube
 
Then why the F would PTI support the same CJ who took an oath by a DICTATOR!

Sir like I've already said several times in my posts, it was more about restoring judiciary which was under attack by a dictator, and it was more about making a stand against that dictator. Lawyer movement provided a golden opportunity to all anti-dictatorial forces to unit and stand against that dictator. It didn't had much to do with Iftikhar Ch. Any tom, dick or harry instead of Iftikhar Ch would get similar support as what he got during lawyers movement..
 
Here's a News story on history of high-profile contempt of court cases in Pakistan:

...Let us briefly recap all the key incidents where some four Pakistani prime ministers, one caretaker premier, an army chief, dozens of judges, ministers, leaders of top political parties and influential business magnates etc have been guilty of earning the wrath of the apex court arbiters: Contempt proceedings against a sitting Prime Minister, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, were initiated in 1976 in the case filed by the National Awami Party (NAP), now called the Awami National Party (ANP). During the eventful 1970s, the National Awami Party was banned by the government and the decision was upheld by the courts of the time. However, Bhutto could not restrain himself from airing statements against the NAP, something that was not permissible in line with the court order. The late Abdul Wali Khan, father of the current Awami National Party Chief, Asfandyar Wali Khan, had then filed a contempt petition against Bhutto 37 years ago in 1976. Having entertained Wali Khan’s petition, the court had gone on to issue contempt notices to the prime minister of the time. However, no concrete evidences were found against Premier Bhutto and the notices were subsequently discharged. Pakistan’s former Army Chief, General Aslam Beg, was first charged with contempt of court on February 21, 1993. In a newspaper interview on February 4, 1993, General Beg had admitted that he had sent an emissary to the Supreme Court to warn the judges not to restore the National Assembly. The then Chief Justice Naseem Hassan Shah got infuriated over the former army chief’s interview and had held him for contempt. In this case, CJ Shah had remarked: “We are very sorry to hand over the defence of the country to a person who was so careless.” The court had finally convicted the retired General of contempt, but strangely did not give any judgment about the sentence. The same court even overturned its own decision after an appeal was filed. And finally on January 09, 1994, all proceedings against General Aslam Beg were dropped. The second time General Beg had to face a contempt charge was on March 8, 2012, when during the hearing of the 1996 Asghar Khan Case; his statement was termed contempt of court by the judges. During the proceedings on that date, Aslam Baig had submitted his rejoinder to the statement of the ex-Mehran Bank President, Younis Habib. Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhary-led Supreme court had expressed its ire over a paragraph of Baig’s statement and had termed it contempt of court. The chief justice had then asked Aslam Baig to tender an apology over that paragraph. Left with no other option, the former army chief had to seek pardon instantly and had to appeal for the deletion of that particular paragraph. General Beg was in court to reject ex-Mehran Bank President Younis Habib’s statement, which was submitted in the Supreme Court over the petition filed by Air Marshal (R) Asghar Khan. The statement was related to the alleged disbursement of money among the national politicians by the ISI to disrupt the general elections of 1990. Pakistan’s current Premier Nawaz Sharif had to appear personally before the Supreme Court on November 17, 1997, after a contempt notice was issued to him on recommendation of the then Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah. This was Sharif’s second stint in power..

Chronology of key contempt cases in Pakistan - thenews.com.pk
 
Here's an Open Letter to Chief Justice Chaudhry from attorney Naeem Bukhari published in The News:

...I am mildly amused at your desire to be presented a guard of honour in Peshawar. I am titillated by the appropriation of Mercedes Benz car or is it cars, the use of the Government of the Punjab’s plane to offer Fateha in Multan, to Sheikhupura for Fateha on a Government of the Punjab helicopter, to Hyderabad on a Government of the Sind’s plane for attending a High Court function, the huge amount spent in refurbishing the chamber and residence of the Chief Justice, the reservation for yourself of a wing in Supreme Court Judges guest house in Lahore, the permanent occupation by the Supreme Court of the official residence of the Chief Justice of Sind, who per force lives in the basement of his father’s house. As his class fellow in the Government College, Lahore, I can vouch that living in the basement will do him no harm.

I am not perturbed that Dr. Arsalaan (your son) secured 16/100 in the English paper for the Civil Services Examination, that there is some case against him in some court in Baluchistan, that from the Health Department in Baluchistan he has shifted to FIA, that he has obtained training in the Police Academy, that he reportedly drives a BMW 7-Series car, that there is a complaint against him with the National Accountability Bureau.

My grievances and protests are different.

I am perturbed that the Supreme Court should issue a clarificatory statement on his behalf. I am perturbed that Justice (Retd.) Wajihuddin Ahmed should be constrained to advise you on television that “people who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others”. I am perturbed that the Chief Justice should summon Mir Shakeel-ur-Rehman to his chambers on Dr. Arsalaan’s account.

I am appalled that you announce decisions in Court, while in the written judgment an opposite conclusion is recorded.

In the Petition for leave to appeal filed by Dr Sher Afghan Niazi, Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs (in which Respondent’s Counsel were Mr Khalid Anwar and Mr Qadir Saeed), you refused to grant leave in open Court and yet in the written order, leave was granted to Dr Sher Afghan Niazi.

On 15.2.2007, Mr Fakurddin G. Ebrahim complained that, in open Court you had accepted his appeal but dismissed the same in the judgement, subsequently recorded.

If Mr Khalid Anwar, a former Minister of Law and Parliamentary Affairs and Mr Fakrhuddin, Senior Counsel are treated in this manner, the fate of lesser known lawyers would certainly be far worse.

My grievances also concern the manner in which the last and highest court of appeal is dispensing justice, under your leadership.

My Lord, the dignity of lawyers is consistently being violated by you. We are treated harshly, rudely, brusquely and nastily. We are not heard. We are not allowed to present our case. There is little scope for advocacy. The words used in the Bar Room for Court No. 1 are “the slaughter house”. We are cowed down by aggression from the Bench, led by you. All we receive from you is arrogance, aggression and belligerence. You also throw away the file, while contemptuously announcing “This is dismissed”.

Yet this aggression is not for everyone. When Mr. Sharifuddin Pirzada appears, your Lordship’s demeanour and appearance is not just sugar and honey. You are obsequious to the point of meekness. So apart from violating our dignity, which the constitution commands to be inviolable, we suffer discrimination in your court.

I am not raising the issue of verbal onslaughts and threats to Police Officers and other Civil Servants, who have the misfortune to be summoned, degraded and reminded that “This is the Supreme Court”......

Naeem Bokhari
 
I just hope this rift btw imran khan and SC gets resolved quickly as we have much bigger issues to address , ego will get no one any where its causing damage to Pakistan there will be no winners only losers on both sides . Hope sense prevails !
 
I just hope this rift btw imran khan and SC gets resolved quickly as we have much bigger issues to address , ego will get no one any where its causing damage to Pakistan there will be no winners only losers on both sides . Hope sense prevails !

Is Pakistan all about rift among two people?

One day they decide to destroy Pakistan's infrastructure in the name of long march funded by enemies of Pakistan.
Next day they sue each other and in the end they got to save friendship but what about suffering of Pakistan and state expenses occurred on the show?

Imran Khan should have been booked, under article 6 for all the destruction he brought upon Pakistan in the name of restoration o f cheap justice.

Someone shall go to libraries and read the old news of destruction, caused by PTI in an open show of vandalism... called long march.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom