the article is full of bias .. the author says "The Gujarat pogroms took place after an unexplained fire on a train, which killed Hindu activists " ,and this comment comes after the sit proving that the bogee of the train was put on fire by a mob of 1540 muslim extremists , wich killed 59 , among whom der were 25 women and 15 children only after this hindus went on a rampage ( innocents are dead on both sides but surely it wasnt hinus/bjp/rss who started it ) it was proved in the court that burning of the train was pre planned by Muslim radical group
Harkat-ul Jehad-e-Islami .. and 31 of its members are convicted by the court...
Godhra train burning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
next tym stop reading those biased anti hindu , anti bjp articles and try to get info frm a neutral source...
and abt the role of c.m in the riots is considered , the riots were completely stopped in 3 days wth the entry of army in to the state...
let me tell u tat modi became c.m in 2001 after a massive earthquake in guj , wch destroyed the economy of the state..
he wasn't even a mla before becoming c.m so he didn't hav a governing exp. before this , jst after 9 months of his swearing in the godhra train burning has occured and the reactive response by hindus has taken place . unlike a situation where riots happen at a particular place ,the riots are spread across the state and he couldn't jst control it with the limited existing police force tat is already stretched all along the state.. but, before the army was called in, modi asked for an additional police force from 3 neighbouring states to control the riots( these 3 states form border states of gujarat wth pakistan making the other border) , and all the 3 the states had congress c.m's who refused to send their police forces.. (u see , its politics they want to gain their political advantage over the death of innocents )..
if the que comes abt y central/army forces took so much tym to enter the state.. unlike pakistan there wl be a lot of bureaucratic work required to let army enter in to a state fr safeguarding securuity...
( watch the vdeo frm 2:55)
( watch ths vdeo to knw hw media ,insensitively played part in promoting the voilence )
and abt u r comments on majority of indians supporting 2002 riots by electing him , and calling india non-secular ... do u knw hw he has been ostracised by indian media, parties, politicians ?? after 2002 riots , BJP lost the national election even after doing tremondous work on development front , they improved the economic growth from a mere 3-4% to 8.2%. and vajpayee being the most sought after P.M even in kashmir valley..stl they lost the election, only bcz the majority of india felt wrong wth wat happend in gujarat... so stop questioning us on our secular credentials .....
it took modi a 3 consecutive wins in his state , with exceptional growth in his state and wth a minimum corruption levels and court declaring him to be non-guilts in the riots to be acceptable to the majority of india..
in an other post u wer comparing u r judiciary system wth ours .. do u knw all the perpetrators of the 2002 riots were convicted by the court , wch included a minister frm modi's own cabinet ??? stl u want to compare hafiz saeed wth modi ?? and pak judiciary wth ours ( i dnt want to gve lnks abt u r judiciary where a lawyer who supported punjab gov. assasinator is now a judge in kpk court) ??
if u stl want to look at him wth u r biased eyes , it doesn't matter to us .. it was we who elected him as our P.M and we are fine wth it , in the last elections almost 10-15% muslims of india voted for his party .... he is already accepted a section of muslims and the rest wl run over tym...
if u feel this is going to bring our country dwn , be it.. anyway isn't it the wsh of pakistan to see india fall ?? it was our choice and we wl be facng watever the consequences are.. thanks..
