Is " Nice Attack" part 2 of the Western conspiracy to declare the Muslim world a terrorist?

[FAROOQ RASHID BUTT]

I do not consider this policy of reaction to be correct, but such a statement could serve as an effective threat to deter Western extremism.

Muslims have ‘right to punish’ French, says Malaysia’s Mahathir

Malaysia’s former leader Mahathir Mohamad accuses Twitter and Facebook of misrepresenting comments.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[nahtanbob]

Freedom of Speech is not totally free. It has consequences. Live with that.

actions also have consequences. live wih it

 

[That Guy]

The title is stupid, they have 9/11 for that.

 

[Cliftonite]

Not everything is a conspiracy by the West.

Why is it so hard for people to admit that some Muslims are radicalized? I mean we witnessed enough of these acts in our country to know what ends radicalization can drive people to.

Inb4 someone calling me an Indian lol.

 

[That Guy]

I do not consider this policy of reaction to be correct, but such a statement could serve as an effective threat to deter Western extremism.

Muslims have ‘right to punish’ French, says Malaysia’s Mahathir

Malaysia’s former leader Mahathir Mohamad accuses Twitter and Facebook of misrepresenting comments.

www.aljazeera.com

Why in the hell is everyone misquoting Mahathir?

He started out by condemning the stabbing, and then also pointed out that the French are responsible for millions of deaths (and if we look at france's colonial history, he's right), and if muslims were to apply eye for an eye, they would be justified in killing just as many french people, but Muslim don't.

I saw a bunch of dumbass redditors getting their panties twisted, because they read a misleading headline.

The point is, context matters.

 

[PakFactor]

Not everything is a conspiracy by the West.

Why is it so hard for people to admit that some Muslims are radicalized? I mean we witnessed enough of these acts in our country to know what ends radicalization can drive people to.

Inb4 someone calling me an Indian lol.

Mod's please ban this filth again --
An Indian ashamed of his own flag.

@AgNoStiC MuSliM @waz @WebMaster @LeGenD
@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @Musings @PAKISTANFOREVER

This is Cliftonite on another forum saying he's from Andrah Pradesh and you can possibly trace his IP Address to some where in Central US as well.

Why in the hell is everyone misquoting Mahathir?

He started out by condemning the stabbing, and then also pointed out that the French are responsible for millions of deaths (and if we look at france's colonial history, he's right), and if muslims were to apply eye for an eye, they would be justified in killing just as many french people, but Muslim don't.

I saw a bunch of dumbass redditors getting their panties twisted, because they read a misleading headline.

The point is, context matters.

I stated in the other threat, please just read the headlines and go off without reading the full context of the articles. You can thank the gutter nali people across the border to spreading this non-sense.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Time to add the standard PDF reply...just do the search/replace of the underlined words..

"This just shows the inherent racism the white Anglo-Saxons Protestants have to non-whites by attacking them in a Mosque."

 

[CatSultan]

If you go to Harlem shouting the N word, don't complain when you get shot. You can have freedom of speech but you have to be prepared to deal with the consequences.

 

[313ghazi]

Whole muslim world should condemn this attack in one voice if they really dont condone this.
Silence on their part means complete support to such terrorism.

You can suck on the proverbial.

When you Sanghis all beg forgiveness for the transgressions of your cow lynching rapey kind we will consider it.

The title is stupid, they have 9/11 for that.

And centuries of texts dedicated to painting Muslims as evil. Your history gents - thier hate for us is central to thier political unity.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

I do not consider this policy of reaction to be correct, but such a statement could serve as an effective threat to deter Western extremism.

Muslims have ‘right to punish’ French, says Malaysia’s Mahathir

Malaysia’s former leader Mahathir Mohamad accuses Twitter and Facebook of misrepresenting comments.

www.aljazeera.com

If Muslim Leaders are making this an issue between Muslims and the West, why should the West disagree?
Just asking...
Such statement will certainly fuel the extreme right in the West.
It will certainly not make them abandoning free speech.

What do you think will be the reaction to :
- Either You agree that Islam is a religion of Peace, or an individual Muslim will kill You?
That is how your comments will be interpreted in the West.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

If Muslim Leaders are making this an issue between Muslims and the West, why should the West disagree?
Just asking...
Such statement will certainly fuel the extreme right in the West.
It will certainly not make them abandoning free speech.

What do you think will be the reaction to :
- Either You agree that Islam is a religion of Peace, or an individual Muslim will kill You?
That is how your comments will be interpreted in the West.

We have a right to boycott French for insulting our Prophet saws.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Mod's please ban this filth again --
A Pajeet ashamed of his own shit colored flag.

I don’t see anything wrong in that particular post of his.

Yes, the post he was banned for last time around absolutely deserved a warning, but his comment is correct in this instance.

Also, members are requested to not discuss or speculate about the identity of other members on the open forum. You can bring up such concerns by reporting posts and listing your doubts about identity in the report post comments or start a thread in the members section and politely ask a member about his/her identity, assuming they want to respond.

 

[Xerxes22]

What Macron has done is the most IDIOTIC and outrageous a thing any heads of state has done in recent History. He has given a new definition to free speech by championing those who insult the great Prophet (PBUH).

The bulk of the hypocrisy is that ROTHSCHILD banker Macron has allowed insult towards the Prophet (PBUH) and 1.8 billions of his followers as being part of FREE SPEECH. Whilst wen another Head of state (ERDOGAN) rightfully calls him a MADMAN, then his Foreign Ministry issues a strong statements saying how such INSULTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE to the President of France. OMG, my blood is boiling even typing this.

How dare you. So, when your clowns insult the great Prophet (PBUH) with insulting cartoons then thats acceptable and is a part of FREE SPEECH. But wen Erdogan calls you what you are then shud it not also be classified as FREE SPEECH TOO? YOU HYPOCRITE STOOGE OF THE ROTSCHILD CARTEL.

I WILL NOW EXCERSICE MY FREE SPEECH AS AMMENDED BY THE BANKER MACRON.

1. MACRON YOU ARE AN IDIOT FOR PITTING PPL AGAINST ONE ANOTHER.
2. MACRON I ALSO THINK YOU MUST GET UR BRAINS CHECKED.
3. MACRON YOU ARE A WEIRDO. LOOK WHO YOU GOT MARRIED TO.
4. MACRON YOU ARE A CLOWN, A SORRY EXCUSE OF A POLITICIAN.

I AM ENTITLED FULLY TO EXCERSICE MY FREE SPEECH AS MACRON HAD AMENDED IT DEFINITION A FEW DAYS EARLIER. IF INSULTS TOWARDS THE PROPHET(PBUH) IS PART OF FREE SPEECH, SO IS INSULT TO WARDS MACRON.

N.B. I woke up today listening to the sound coming out of the windows. I realised it was our beloved prophet (PBUH)'s birthday. I must say I really teared up. What have we done to ourselves. That nowadays we cant even defend the honor of our prophet (PBUH) . It was a really emotional moment nd I felt quite upset. His birthday came at a time wen faithless people have decided to wage war against his ideals. What have we done to ourselves.

 

[paritosh]

Freedom of Speech is not totally free. It has consequences. Live with that.

This clause, does it apply to a particular jurisdiction or to all humanity?
Can you and should you make rules for the world? You can have a say in engineering freedom of speech laws in your country, but I don't think you can dictate how another country or religion should operate.
The French are blasphemers, you can choose not to go to France, but don't expect them to look up to you for defining what freedom of speech means.

What Macron has done is the most IDIOTIC and outrageous a thing any heads of state has done in recent History. He has given a new definition to free speech by championing those who insult the great Prophet (PBUH).

The bulk of the hypocrisy is that ROTHSCHILD banker Macron has allowed insult towards the Prophet (PBUH) and 1.8 billions of his followers as being part of FREE SPEECH. Whilst wen another Head of state (ERDOGAN) rightfully calls him a MADMAN, then his Foreign Ministry issues a strong statements saying how such INSULTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE to the President of France. OMG, my blood is boiling even typing this.

How dare you. So, when your clowns insult the great Prophet (PBUH) with insulting cartoons then thats acceptable and is a part of FREE SPEECH. But wen Erdogan calls you what you are then shud it not also be classified as FREE SPEECH TOO? YOU HYPOCRITE STOOGE OF THE ROTSCHILD CARTEL.

I WILL NOW EXCERSICE MY FREE SPEECH AS AMMENDED BY THE BANKER MACRON.

1. MACRON YOU ARE AN IDIOT FOR PITTING PPL AGAINST ONE ANOTHER.
2. MACRON I ALSO THINK YOU MUST GET UR BRAINS CHECKED.
3. MACRON YOU ARE A WEIRDO. LOOK WHO YOU GOT MARRIED TO.
4. MACRON YOU ARE A CLOWN, A SORRY EXCUSE OF A POLITICIAN.

I AM ENTITLED FULLY TO EXCERSICE MY FREE SPEECH AS MACRON HAD AMENDED IT DEFINITION A FEW DAYS EARLIER. IF INSULTS TOWARDS THE PROPHET(PBUH) IS PART OF FREE SPEECH, SO IS INSULT TO WARDS MACRON.

N.B. I woke up today listening to the sound coming out of the windows. I realised it was our beloved prophet (PBUH)'s birthday. I must say I really teared up. What have we done to ourselves. That nowadays we cant even defend the honor of our prophet (PBUH) . It was a really emotional moment nd I felt quite upset. His birthday came at a time wen faithless people have decided to wage war against his ideals. What have we done to ourselves.

If it counts for anything, I fully support your freedom of speech. Macron obviously wasn't subtle.
The problem, from the French people's perspective, is the invisible line that exists in the minds of certain muslims who respond to free speach with unabashed violence. That is not an eye for an eye by any means as far as the way the French see it is concerned.

 

[Xerxes22]

This clause, does it apply to a particular jurisdiction or to all humanity?
Can you and should you make rules for the world? You can have a say in engineering freedom of speech laws in your country, but I don't think you can dictate how another country or religion should operate.
The French are blasphemers, you can choose not to go to France, but don't expect them to look up to you for defining what freedom of speech means.

tell me one thing if insulting the man who is followed faithfully by 1.8 billion worldwide is seen by Macron as being part of FREE SPEECH, then why did the French Foreign Ministry issued a protest towards Erdogan calling Macron a madman , and saying such Insults are unacceptable? why did they do that ? So isnt Erdogan's speech also FREE SPEECH by Macron's own standards? Tell me.

whatever clause ur talking about may not apply to a particular jurisdiction or whatever. BUT DO U KNOW WHAT DOES APPLY TO ALL ? EQUAL STANDARDS. Cuz otherwise its just hypocrisy, which in the case of Macron and his cronies is.