Yup it is.Shahbash!
ridiculous theory
Pehlay awam ko pira, likha lo! Khuda ka khoaf karo...
I like your post but I just want to make some corrections. The French M-51 plume seems to be 3 times its length and not 4 while Shaheen-III plume is slightly longer than its length around 1.2 times. Just to reduce the amount of the perceived effort required to develop a solid fuel motor for an ICBM. By the way, why can't we launch an ICBM from deep inside our territory to avoid interceptions by any ABMs of the enemy. I don't think India will be fool enough to place its ABM very close to the border and risk being easily taken out by Pakistan. So a combination of liquid and solid fuel stages should do the trick.I am not saying that we dont have the technology or capability. I am saying that the technology ready and usable for a Pakistani ICBM is based on liquid fueled rocket which we do not intend to use anymore because of Indian ABM.
To make a solid fueled ICBM if ever Pakistan wants to do that, will need improvement in our solid fuel technology.
For Example look at the plume of this French M51 ICBM. Its about 4 times longer than the missile.
Now look at the plume of our Shaheen-3. Its about the same length as the missile itself.
So by common sense the French M-51 is producing 4 times more thrust than our Shaheen-3., and by same assumption we will need at lest twice as much fuel to reach same distance as a French ICBM or any other solid fueled ICBM. I am saying twice the fuel because i also assume that our ICBM is carrying 1 ton warhead not 2.5 tons like Trident or M51. For that kind of throw weight we will need even more fuel .
By that stipulation under current solid fuel tech capability of ours, the ICBM we make will be too heavy to be feasible.
Wahi tou Sir Jee,kar rahey hain.App ko nazar nahi atta itna bara CPEC bana rahey hain.
Pehlay awam ko pira, likha lo! Khuda ka khoaf karo...
Which Arab Invader was HATAF-X
ICBM's at close range,like 4000km from launch to Target,are impossible to Target.
tou ye kya tha phir?
we do not pose any threat to anyone by testing an ICBM , i have had some info from my sources but it is too early to disclose at least we would like to say that PK does have an ICBM programe.
It would be for greater defence capibility and also to step into space age, Uncle sam ? we would not care about them if we have to test a missile because its not the Govt who does that alone on their own
More than enough.
So it is like to create an illusion that we have an ICBM but we dont have an ICBM so we still gonna work with west keeping our adversaries (including potential ones) off balance but will test it when it is most needed.
