What's new

Is India Building Thermonuclear Weapons?

India already possesses, if there is a doubt then India can test again to prove it, as India is not a signatory of CTBT.

India conducted nuclear test in 1974.
The tests conducted in 1998 were thermonuclear, but failed.
Well, its been 16 years since then.
I think you should test it to confirm the operational capability, before you fire it on some other country and it fails again.
 
.
The bomb used on Hiroshima was a fission bomb, with a blast yield of 16 kilotons.

In comparison, a modern Chinese thermonuclear warhead is about 4 megatons, i.e. a blast yield of 4000 kilotons.
the thing is that will you use it ?

India conducted nuclear test in 1974.
The tests conducted in 1998 were thermonuclear, but failed.
Well, its been 16 years since then.
I think you should test it to confirm the operational capability, before you fire it on some other country and it fails again.
1998 test failed who told you ? ISI sponsored news !
 
.
Report says new plant boosts Indian ability to produce thermonuclear weapons - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

NEW DELHI: India is expanding a covert uranium enrichment plant that could potentially support the development of thermonuclear weapons, a defence research group said on Friday, raising the stakes in an arms race with China and Pakistan.

The revelation highlights a lack of nuclear safeguards on India, while sanctions-bound Iran faces minute scrutiny in talks with world powers over its own nuclear programme.

New units at the Indian Rare Metals Plant would boost India’s ability to produce weapons-grade uranium to twice the amount needed for its planned nuclear-powered submarine fleet, IHS Jane’s said.

The facility, located near Mysore in southern India, could be operational by mid-2015, the research group said, basing its findings on analysis of satellite imagery and public statements by Indian officials.

“Taking into account all the enriched uranium likely to be needed by the Indian nuclear submarine fleet, there is likely to be a significant excess,” Matthew Clements, editor of IHS Jane’s Intelligence Review, said.

“One potential use of this would be for the development of thermonuclear weapons.”

No comment was available from the Indian government press office or the foreign ministry. Pakistan reacted with consternation, with an aide to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif saying the news underscored India’s “established hegemony”.

“This is something that India has been trying to develop for a long time,” said Tariq Azeem. “We don’t want any nuclear race. That doesn’t bode well for either country.”

Unlike Iran, India is not a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. New Delhi tested its first nuclear weapon in 1974, provoking international sanctions that barred it from importing nuclear technology and materials.

It conducted tests again in 1998 that drew a quick response from Pakistan, triggering an arms race between the neighbours.

A civil nuclear cooperation deal with the United States, sealed in 2008, gave India access to know-how and fuel in return for a pledge — so far unfulfilled — to bring in US firms to expand India’s nuclear power generation capacity.

The pact exempts military facilities and stockpiles of nuclear fuel from scrutiny by the International Atomic Energy Agency, a United Nations watchdog. The Mysore plant is not subject to IAEA safeguards. The IAEA declined to comment.

SATELLITE VIEW: Based on its analysis of commercial satellite images, IHS Jane’s has identified what appears to be a new uranium hexafluoride plant that would increase the uranium enrichment capacity of the Mysore facility.

The plant would be able to produce a surplus of around 160kg a year of uranium enriched to 90 per cent purity, IHS Jane’s says. That is roughly double the needs of the nuclear submarine fleet that India is developing to supplement its land-based missile arsenal — and enough to make five atomic bombs.

By blending the uranium with its existing stock of plutonium, India could develop thermonuclear weapons that have a more complex detonation process and greater force than simpler weapons.

“Whether or not India uses the plant mainly for fuel for reactors and naval vessels as is sometimes surmised, it adds to India’s already far greater advantage over Pakistan in terms of nuclear weapons production potential,” said Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the non-proliferation programme at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

“It also brings India closer to matching China, which is how most Indians would probably see it.”

The IHS findings have been corroborated by other analysts, with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) writing this week that the Mysore facility could signify India’s intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons.

India is estimated by SIPRI to hold 90 to 110 nuclear weapons in its arsenal.—Reuters

Published in Dawn, June 21st, 2014
 
. . .
I know ....that's why I said I wonder. I'll go with the scientist. Gov't lies too much

There is a difference, he din't said that it wasn't a success, he said we din't get the yield we targeted for. Don't understand how will it make a difference when few people LESS would die than we intended for?
 
. .
probably already developed.remember the sub kiloton "devices" exploded in Pokhran??also,one way to get the hint is that Akash was developed to carry "Nuclear Bomb"(Neutrino Bomb) to destroy any aircraft or missile using flux.plus,making Neutrino bomb is not that much hard when you possess so much knowledge on Nuclear Science.my guess is,it was Shakti-IV,.5 KT yield,just like USA's W-66 Neutrino bomb(possibly,it was more powerful) while Akash would play the role of Sprint Missile.if you compare this device with W-66,W-66 weighs some 70 kg,so,Shakti-IV will be within 50 Kg(similar level of miniaturization),well within Akash's payload carrying capability.
Plz through more light on shakti4
 
. .
Bhai log what is the difference between thermonuclear bomb and normal nuclear bomb ?

In nutshell - Nuclear bombs are of two types, one that bet on fission is called atomic bomb and one that bet on fusion is called hydrogen or thermonuclear bomb. Both the bombs are nuclear but only one of them is atomic (one that depends of fission) so we can say every atomic bomb is a nuclear bomb but every nuclear bomb is not an atomic bomb. Thermonuclear bombs are more devastating and good news for you is that India possesses them and Pakistan lacks them, Pakistan has atomic bombs and working on thermonuclear bombs.

Nuclear fission: Reaction in which nucleus divides into smaller nuclei with the concurrent release of energy
Nuclear fusion: Reaction in which nuclei combine to form a bigger nucleus with the concurrent release of energy.
 
. . . . .
India already possesses, if there is a doubt then India can test again to prove it, as India is not a signatory of CTBT.
More amazingly he didn't advertise his book
Thats the news in this thread.
No "evil indian designs" para and stupid link at the end.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom