Is China trying to fan anti-India feeling in Nepal by heavily investing in projects?

[salimpheku]

Luckily, only need a little more than India, it seems all ok for China.

The way CHina fleeced Sri Lanka is a lesson most countries will not soon forget.
If the comrades are thinking that the world is dumb and only they are intelligent, they have something else coming their way.

 

[wiseone2]

Luckily, only need a little more than India, it seems all ok for China.

try collecting the money from venezuela

 

[manlion]

Some Paks and Chinese posters are patting themselves on the back on what makes the Nepal politics works always in favour of India.

The Madhesis who are pro India and 50% of Nepali population If it comes to shove they will demand a separate nation. A reason why India can never be taken out of Nepal even if CHina invests 100B$. I hope some idiots understand the cultural connections

Madhesis comprise only 19.3 percent of Nepal’s population
http://southasiacheck.org/fact-check/madhesis-comprise-only-19-3-percent-of-nepals-population/

how sanghis lie with a straight face ?

 

[MultaniGuy]

Madhesis comprise only 19.3 percent of Nepal’s population
http://southasiacheck.org/fact-check/madhesis-comprise-only-19-3-percent-of-nepals-population/

how sanghis lie with a straight face ?

Haha, Nepal is going to side with China eventually.

Its only a matter of time. Indian influence is doomed in the region.

 

[manlion]

Haha, Nepal is going to side with China eventually.

Its only a matter of time. Indian influence is doomed in the region.

Nepal, Bhutan and Lanka will eventually ditch India and if Madhesis demand separation, will India's Gorkhas/Gurkhas remain silent ?

As the Doklam crisis continues to linger, Bhutan seems to be drifting away from India. In the capital, THE WEEK finds young Bhutanese openly proclaiming their love for China. Even monks and senior officials are not immune to China’s charm

Strategic experts in Bhutan say that, to resolve the crisis, India should respect the Anglo-Chinese treaty (1890), which has been accepted by successive Indian governments since independence. “And that clearly says India would have access to Nathu La while China could access Doklam,” said political commentator and blogger Wangcha Sangey.

It is highly immoral on the part of India to abrogate the treaty. Bhutan will not accept it. We may not raise our voice out of fear and pressure from India. But Doklam is an issue between China and Bhutan. India has no business to interfere in it,” Sangey told me.

It was probably the harshest possible view coming from anyone in Bhutan even as its government has opted to stay silent. Although the king himself is said to be in touch with India, Bhutan has only issued just a brief statement, “We want both India and China to settle their disputes as we do not want to see any war.”

A senior official in Thimphu told me that the Bhutanese government had requested India to withdraw its forces from Doklam so that China, too, would pull back its troops. India reportedly reduced the number of its forces, but there was no complete withdrawal. Subsequently, Bhutan refused to make any anti-China statements in India’s support.

My next stop was the residence of Lyonpo Jigme Zangpo, the speaker of the Bhutanese National Assembly. In terms of stature and protocol, Zangpo is next only to the king. He, too, was not so happy to see me. “I am not here to answer your questions. How could you barge in here like this?” he asked. He said there was no damage to the India-Bhutan friendship. “But everybody would have to understand that national security is of utmost interest to us.”

Zangpo, however, revealed that Bhutan was talking to China about launching formal diplomatic relations. “I cannot tell you more,” he said. “Please understand that we maintain silence because of a well thought out decision taken at the top.” He said it was high time India embraced China.

Bhutanese government sources confirmed that the country, which once shared a special and exclusive relationship with India, was widening its diplomatic outreach. It now has diplomatic ties with 53 countries and is in the process of establishing ties with more.

Jigmey Thinley, a 27-year-old Buddhist monk, said so long as the Chinese did not interfere with their religious practices, the monks did not have a problem with them. He said the Bhutanese were open to more cooperation with monks from Tibet. Moreover, they did not accept the Dalai Lama as their religious leader as he had refused to listen to them. “He has never visited Bhutan. The Bhutanese probably might not accept his anti-China outbursts,” said Thinley. “Once when I was in Bodhgaya, I tried to get the Dalai Lama’s blessings. But he had a heavy security cover and I was denied entry thrice.” Thinley said he would never again try to meet the Dalai Lama.

http://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/dangerous-liaison.html

Communists think that the whole world is like them - without morals.

We Indians encourage Nepal to do excellent business with China. Nepal MUST use India card, get really really cheap money, if possible at ZERO interest and play the communists like a fiddle.

India - Nepal have open borders. Nepal should demand open borders between Nepal & China as well, with a small condition i.e Nepal people can go and work in China without any Visa.
Nepal should take complete advantage of China in every way possible and fleece it.

what moral rights 'democratic' India have to comment on communist ?

Impose hindi on Tamils ? Impose AFPSA in the NE states ? Sikh/Tamil genocide ? gross HR violations in occupied Kashmir ? Ban beef /lynching ? Dalit oppression ? Farmers' suicide ?

https://www.facebook.com/

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[Chhatrapati]

No quite sure of you said when India is not invited maybe India is standing at the door beg to take the left over from China-Nepal's deal...if that you call that "reap the benefits"

Chini's are only good at rhetorics, gaming and throwing stones like bamboo girls. We'll see who get the benefits.

Keep constructing Nepal

Yes, India will benefit as well eventually, but not as fast as a direct investment to next door country!

Yeah, they are talking about ideal scenario. Where all the money goes to the projects. And the Chinese once the construction is completed will start getting the benefits.

let's see what happens in a real scenario.

The way CHina fleeced Sri Lanka is a lesson most countries will not soon forget.
If the comrades are thinking that the world is dumb and only they are intelligent, they have something else coming their way.

I kinda like the way these lot thinks. "We will shower more money, people begin to love us. Then we can armtwist them to our interest."

But when they have enough facepalm moments, they cry. And nothing is funnier than an angry Chinese