What's new

Is Baluchistan more strategically significant than Afghanistan?

you are hiding under the balls of the americans and you have not brought anything advantagous to the US so why would they continue to bleed for india's objectives in Afghanistan ?!?

The Yanks have NOW realized this that you ( indians ) have nothing to offer to them in strategic terms as far as afghanistan is concerend.

The main concern of the yanks at the moment is the insurgency in Afghanistan and india has done nothing ( other than blame Pakistan ) in this regrard so the US is not foolish that they will continue to bleed for india when india does not bring anything meaningfull to help them!

All india does is blame Pakistan ... which by now has become boring to listen to , even for the Americans.

Your time will be up when the yanks leave , even the cows in india know this.

And I thought you guys were interested only in camels!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
How do you know they have not given proof to india or others? India or others will not necessarily announce they have gotten proof, especially if it works against their interests. In fact Musharraf and even current government has said several times they have provided proof to indian, US, afghan governments.

Why cant they share the same evidence with the whole world Media and discredit India.

They cant do it because they have Zilch evidence.
 
. .
Why cant they share the same evidence with the whole world Media and discredit India.

They cant do it because they have Zilch evidence.

1. So now you're diverting since your previous argument was found to be flawed.
2. Again, an incredibly simplistic argument. How many times has evidence been provided to media across the world? It happens after states agree on something.
3. The idea of providing evidence to media itself is very simplistic since media itself is an interest group.

So what's the conclusion? The evidence has been provided to the relevant states. A Baloch separatist leader himself pretty much agreed (and it should be obvious from that interview) that he gets support from india.
 
. .
you are hiding under the balls of the americans and you have not brought anything advantagous to the US so why would they continue to bleed for india's objectives in Afghanistan ?!?

The Yanks have NOW realized this that you ( indians ) have nothing to offer to them in strategic terms as far as afghanistan is concerend.

The main concern of the yanks at the moment is the insurgency in Afghanistan and india has done nothing ( other than blame Pakistan ) in this regrard so the US is not foolish that they will continue to bleed for india when india does not bring anything meaningfull to help them!

All india does is blame Pakistan ... which by now has become boring to listen to , even for the Americans.

Your time will be up when the yanks leave , even the cows in india know this.

man u need to wake up,u.s didnt enter afgh 4 india,dramatic conditions after 9/11 brought india and u.s closer.and u.s discovered a virgin territory,and india got this opportunity to get closer to u.s.
ties with india will give u.s a lot ,as they never expected.u.s-india nuke deal has given u.s more than 200 billion dollars in future,also the defence sector deals etc,watever u said abv ,i turn this que to u,u.s will never give aid and hardware 4 ever .they r just using pak.
just setting a thief to get the thief,but thief will be captured

http://www.waronjihad.org/pakistan.html
 
.
And what about RAW leader saying they're pumping money into Balochistan? If some want to continue living in denial and avoiding the obvious, by all means. I am not too concerned about indians denying their own involvement as it comes natural to them.
 
.
1. So now you're diverting since your previous argument was found to be flawed.
2. Again, an incredibly simplistic argument. How many times has evidence been provided to media across the world? It happens after states agree on something.
3. The idea of providing evidence to media itself is very simplistic since media itself is an interest group.

So what's the conclusion? The evidence has been provided to the relevant states. A Baloch separatist leader himself pretty much agreed (and it should be obvious from that interview) that he gets support from india.

What evidience, I am not trying to change the topic - No country has said India is involved in supporting Baluchi Freedom, except Pakistan ofcourse.

None of the evidence is shown to anyone, not to United Nations, Not to the Media.
 
.
Why cant they share the same evidence with the whole world Media and discredit India.

They cant do it because they have Zilch evidence.

Exactly, if it solves Pakistan's problems and also gives Pakistan more leverage with US then they should approach the international media.
Or is US pressure, not allowing you to do so?
PS- this is not a troll post .. genuine argument ..
 
.
1. So now you're diverting since your previous argument was found to be flawed.
2. Again, an incredibly simplistic argument. How many times has evidence been provided to media across the world? It happens after states agree on something.
3. The idea of providing evidence to media itself is very simplistic since media itself is an interest group.

So what's the conclusion? The evidence has been provided to the relevant states. A Baloch separatist leader himself pretty much agreed (and it should be obvious from that interview) that he gets support from india.

Dont insult Balouchis by calling a indian puppet fuk.rd a balouch hes probably a bastard inbred bitchh.
A true balouchi might have difference with government but not a fuking taitor.............
LAST DROP OF BLOOD AND EVERY SON OF BALOCHISTAN CAN SACRIFICE HIS LIFE FOR MOTHER(PAKISTAN)....
PLEASE DONT INSULT US...WITH TEARS IN MY HE4ART AND PAIN IN MY HEART.
 
.
What evidience, I am not trying to change the topic - No country has said India is involved in supporting Baluchi Freedom, except Pakistan ofcourse.

None of the evidence is shown to anyone, not to United Nations, Not to the Media.

So from what I can see you are only capable of simplistic thoughts as anything beyond your brain cannot grasp and these kinds of replies make that obvious. I repeat, other countries work on interests. Very few have any interest in doing anything to do with this. How many countries were involved when india claimed ISI involvement for Kashmiri freedom fighters?

As far as UN goes, did US take evidence of 9/11 to UN? Did UK did that for 7/7? WTF are you on? Man you have a very limited thinking capacity. If you do not change it will hurt you in the long run.
 
.
Well it seems your brain has not matured too much considering the types of arguments you're putting forward, which are very very simplistic in nature. Whether or not you heard of India being provided proof is irrelevant as is US rejecting proof. First is irrelevant on the grounds that it will hurt indian interests deeply if they even accept that they were provided proof. Secondly, again it will hurt US interests if they accept Indian involvement as it will give Pakistan an upper hand in the relationship between US and Pakistan and will give Pakistan more leverage over the US.

More or less, fact is even if you ignore this, a Balochi separatist leader pretty much admitted indian support. That was mentioned in my first post in this topic.

lets close this dude,it will not create any path to go.this is a cycle which wont stop.u don't except our vies similarly it is hard to undertstand and accept ur views:yahoo::yahoo:
 
.
Dont insult Balouchis by calling a indian puppet fuk.rd a balouch hes probably a bastard inbred bitchh.
A true balouchi might have difference with government but not a fuking taitor.............
LAST DROP OF BLOOD AND EVERY SON OF BALOCHISTAN CAN SACRIFICE HIS LIFE FOR MOTHER(PAKISTAN)....
PLEASE DONT INSULT US...WITH TEARS IN MY HE4ART AND PAIN IN MY HEART.

I understand what you're saying. These guys have sold themselves and are in bed with the indians. Cannot be called Balochis.
 
.
Exactly, if it solves Pakistan's problems and also gives Pakistan more leverage with US then they should approach the international media.
Or is US pressure, not allowing you to do so?
PS- this is not a troll post .. genuine argument ..

This is exactly what you mentioned. It is a case of both US pressure and the current government not wanting to tackle the issue. US has a lot to lose if Indian involvement becomes public.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom