What's new

Is 2013 Another Year of the Blow Back From US Drone Strikes in Pakistan?

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
What has caused a sudden and tragic jump in mass casualty attacks in Pakistan with over 200 deaths, mostly of Hazara Shias, in a single day on January 10, 2013? Is it just impunity or blow back from intensified US drone attacks early in 2013 as President Barack Obama accelerates US pull-out from Afghanistan? Or is it lack of national political consensus in Pakistan to punish the blood-thirsty Taliban and their murderous sectarian allies like LeJ and SSP?

Background:

In a rare public statement on the effectiveness of US drone campaign in FATA, General Officer Commanding 7-Division Maj-Gen Ghayur Mehmood serving in Waziristan in 2011 said: "Yes there are a few civilian casualties in such precision strikes, but a majority of those eliminated are terrorists, including foreign terrorist elements.” In addition, Maj-Gen Ghayur, who led Pakistani troops in North Waziristan at the time, also said that the drone attacks had negative fallout, scaring the local population and causing their migration to other places. Gen Ghayur said the drone attacks also had social and political repercussions and law-enforcement agencies often felt the heat.

drone+strikes+Pakistan+lwj.jpg


In other words, US drone strikes do kill mainly militants in FATA but also cause a blow back in the rest of the country for law enforcement and innocent civilians, and the Pakistani civil administration has failed miserably in dealing with it.

Blow Back:

The January 10 terrorist attacks appear to be a strong and swift blow back to the stepped up US CIA campaign of seven strikes in the first 10 days of the year 2013. This raises a basic question as to why the Hazara community, minorities and ordinary civilians are targeted? Here are some of the possible reasons:

1. Hazaras are a soft target. They are easily identifiable by their facial features and known to live in certain neighborhoods in and around Quetta.

2. Police in Baluchistan have miserably failed in bringing to justice the sectarian attackers who are allied with the Taliban and operate with impunity.

3. When the police do arrest and prosecute terror suspects, the conviction rate in Pakistani courts is in single digits. It's either due to inadmissible evidence, poor investigative techniques, lack of witnesses or possibly judges who fear for their lives. Well-known terror suspects who openly confess to murderous attacks are allowed walk free by judges for lack of eye-witnesses.

4. Pakistani parliament has failed to enact serious anti-terrorism legislation in the last 5 years to respond to rising civilian casualties in terrorist attacks. The goverment has also failed to protect witnesses, lawyers and judges involved i prosecuting terrorism suspects.

Terror+Deaths+in+Pakistan.jpg


Possible Solutions:

1. Enact the “Investigation for Fair trial bill-2012” as soon as possible. This bill makes electronic evidence such as video footage, telephone wire-taps and e-mails admissible in terrorism cases to reduce reliance on eyewitnesses.

2. Start a serious witness protection program and provide enhanced security to lawyers and judges in terrorism cases.

3. Train police, prosecutors and judges in modern criminal justice techniques and processes to increase their effectiveness.

3. Build broad national political consensus for decisive military action in FATA from where the Taliban terrorists and their sectarian allies get support ad training to carry out devastating terrorist attacks against innocent civilians throughout Pakistan.

Pakistan must now prepare to better protect its civilian population from the intense blow back as the US intensifies its drone campaign in FATA to ensure safe withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2013 and 2014.

Haq's Musings: US Drone Strikes and Bloody Blow Back in Pakistan

Here's a recent video discussion on the subject:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Here's a video of a discussion on the subject:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
2008 - Total drone strikes: 35 Total killed: 6715
2009 - Total drone strikes: 53 Total killed: 11704
2010 - Total drone strikes: 117 Total killed: 7435
2011 - Total drone strikes: 64 Total killed: 6303
2012 - Total drone strikes: 46 Total killed: 6211
2013 - Total drone strikes: 7 Total killed: 384

Looks to me that Drone strikes have reduced the number of deaths in Pakistan.

As drone strikes went up, terrorist attacks in pakistan went down.
 
.
Here's a Wired.com report on UN finding US drone strikes in Pakistan illegal:

...Ben Emmerson spent much of the week in Pakistan soliciting the views of senior government and elected officials about the drone strikes, part of his ongoing effort to investigate the relatively new method of targeted killing. He said in a statement on Friday that he also met with representatives of the tribal areas of western Pakistan that have borne the overwhelming brunt of the drone campaign. The officials underscored to Emmerson that Pakistan doesn’t consent to the U.S. drone effort, and denied extending the tacit consent that its military — with whom Emmerson did not consult — has previously provided.

“As a matter of international law the U.S. drone campaign in Pakistan is therefore being conducted without the consent of the elected representatives of the people, or the legitimate Government of the State,” Emmerson, the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, said in the statement. “It involves the use of force on the territory of another State without its consent and is therefore a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.”

Emmerson’s statement is carefully worded. He portrays himself as conveying Pakistan’s concerns, rather than vouching for their particulars. But it’s still the strongest statement yet by an international official calling for an end to a campaign of targeted killing that briefly flared back up earlier this year. And to call the strikes an unwarranted violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty is tantamount to saying the U.S. is waging a war of aggression.

“The Pashtun tribes of the FATA area have suffered enormously under the drone campaign,” Emmerson’s statement continues, referring to the tribal areas. “It is time for the international community to heed the concerns of Pakistan, and give the next democratically elected government of Pakistan the space, support and assistance it needs to deliver a lasting peace on its own territory without forcible military interference by other States.”

If the drone strikes continue into the next Pakistani government, Emmerson warned, the U.S. drone effort could further destabilize the nuclear power, undermining a key U.S. strategic goal at the heart of the drone strikes. He urged patience with a Pakistani military effort to eradicate al-Qaida’s allies in the tribal areas — one that official Washington has long since written off as unserious.

Significantly and subtly, Emmerson raised doubts over repeated U.S. claims that the targeting efforts behind the drones kill terrorists and spare civilians. Last month, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and a staunch drone advocate, claimed that the drones kill only “single digits” worth of civilians annually. Many of the CIA’s strikes, termed “signature strikes,” kill people believed to fit a pattern of extremist behavior, rather than killing specific, known terrorists.

---

“In discussions with the delegation of tribal Maliks from North Waziristan the Special Rapporteur was informed that drone strikes routinely inflicted civilian casualties, and that groups of adult males carrying out ordinary daily tasks were frequently the victims of such strikes,” Emmerson continued. “They emphasized that to an outsider unfamiliar with Pashtun tribal customs there was a very real risk of misidentification of targets since all Pashtun tribesmen tended to have similar appearance to members of the Pakistan Taliban, including similar (and often indistinguishable) tribal clothing, and since it had long been a tradition among the Pashtun tribes that all adult males would carry a gun at all times. They considered that civilian casualties were a commonplace occurrence and that the threat of such strikes instilled fear in the entire community.”...

U.N. Drone Inquisitor Says It's Time to End Robot War in Pakistan | Danger Room | Wired.com
 
.
2008 - Total drone strikes: 35 Total killed: 6715
2009 - Total drone strikes: 53 Total killed: 11704
2010 - Total drone strikes: 117 Total killed: 7435
2011 - Total drone strikes: 64 Total killed: 6303
2012 - Total drone strikes: 46 Total killed: 6211
2013 - Total drone strikes: 7 Total killed: 384

Looks to me that Drone strikes have reduced the number of deaths in Pakistan.

As drone strikes went up, terrorist attacks in pakistan went down.

yeah, but you have to look at the collateral damage! innocent people are dying due to them.
 
.
2008 - Total drone strikes: 35 Total killed: 6715
2009 - Total drone strikes: 53 Total killed: 11704
2010 - Total drone strikes: 117 Total killed: 7435
2011 - Total drone strikes: 64 Total killed: 6303
2012 - Total drone strikes: 46 Total killed: 6211
2013 - Total drone strikes: 7 Total killed: 384

Looks to me that Drone strikes have reduced the number of deaths in Pakistan.

As drone strikes went up, terrorist attacks in pakistan went down.

It's other way around, more drones, scattered army operations, terrorism is also growing. Only targeted operations by ISI has made much more results, and kick all of TTP leaders out of the country. The number only went down, since most of the people fly out of these zones. But if you really want to compare, how many people died in terrorism from 2001, 2002 upto 2012 you will came to know the number of casualties are actually increase due to revenge feelings in those victims. (It really doesn't matter whether the victim was good or evil, if he is family member then for sure, revenge feeling will be their, this is mentality of those people)

A common understanding in Pakistan is, US was backing TTP, and now since TTP is jammed, they put their agents for targeting shia, and minorities, to show bad face, and increase division inside Pakistan.

Edit: Also, in 2013, this figure is not correct. The number increased much much higher for three months only.
 
.
2008 - Total drone strikes: 35 Total killed: 6715
2009 - Total drone strikes: 53 Total killed: 11704
2010 - Total drone strikes: 117 Total killed: 7435
2011 - Total drone strikes: 64 Total killed: 6303
2012 - Total drone strikes: 46 Total killed: 6211
2013 - Total drone strikes: 7 Total killed: 384

Looks to me that Drone strikes have reduced the number of deaths in Pakistan.

As drone strikes went up, terrorist attacks in pakistan went down.
This was actually studied in a much more granular form, first by Prof. Christine Fair's group and corroborated by Peter Bergen and Jacob Shapiro independently. A recent study by RAND puts this into perspective
By enabling both intelligence collection through overhead surveillance and direct targeting of suspected terrorists, drones reduce militant violence by increasing the costs of militant activities and creating an incentive for militants to lie low to avoid being targeted. We use geo-referenced data on U.S. drone strikes and militant attacks in northwestern Pakistan to test each theory's implications. The results suggest that while overall levels of violence remain high in northwestern Pakistan and neighboring regions of Afghanistan, drone strikes are associated with decreases in the number and lethality of militant attacks in the areas where strikes are conducted. Overall, these results are robust to spatial analysis of the hypothesis that drone strikes in militant sanctuaries simply lead the militants to shift their operations elsewhere. Despite the moral and legal ambiguity of targeted killings, drone strikes do appear to curtail insurgent and terrorist violence in militant sanctuaries.

Link :: The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan
 
.
Back
Top Bottom