What's new

Irked by Imran Khan’s allegations, Justice Minallah asks whether PTI has trust in courts

Two different issues. First the matter of VoNC is not sub-judicial and every citizen has the right to disagree or criticize judiciary’s conduct.
Second, Judge’s duty is to law and justice, just because a critic happens to be a pleader in a case against a false blasphemy charge, the judge does not have the right to ask the pleader to ‘kiss his - - - ‘ as a precondition. If his speeches are against the law, then they are a separate matter.

The issue at hand here is a blasphemy charge against all PTI leadership, which is probably the most malicious and bogus charge in Pakistans history of political victimization. What CJ did here in this plea is pure blackmail, to which he has no right to - especially regarding a sensitive issue of religious blasphemy.
Lol, i mean its stupid to argue law here
Everyone knows its about danda

Supreme court ignores presdential ordinance and then runs and do sou motou at midnight..

Danda legalized all prior martial laws including mushi through courts

Another martial law..this is how it will be rembered and written

Mohtaram judge sahab the narrative “courts are compromised” not because of Khan’s allegation but because of 131/139 @ global justice rank.

Model town? TT cases? Ayan Ali? Dr Asim? Uzair baloch? sauhlat Mirza? Omni Group and 100000 of such cases of elite with zero result. We can understand the black blanket involvement of state institues and weak prosecutions of FIA and NAB but kanoon andha huta hay judge nahi usko sab dikta hay…
Weak prosecution is a myth
There are dozens of books of detail records that a meticulously collected

Since the cases froze last yr i told you guys that PMLN is coming in power

While Zardari is on NRO since 2018
 
.
The Judiciary are ranked 130/140 for a good reason.

Money laundering cases, Nawaz absconding case, Model town massacre.

These courts have huge backlog but will open on a Sunday night on the instructions of Establishment.

Hey moron, get your head out of the sand. The public is itching to create chaos. Only thing standing in the way is Imran Khan.
 
.
This is absolute BS.

A professed trust in any court of law is NOT a criterion for seeking justice according to the relevant laws, for either the prosecution or the defense. One would assume a judge of a high court would know something as basic as that.

Just when one thinks Pakistan as a country could not sink any lower .... out come absolutely stupefying statements like this from those who should know better.
Chor ki darhi mein tinka.
 
.
B!tches of Riches Aliya and Uzma have woken up or not yet.
 
.
Have courts resolved the countless # of cases in their backlog? Why would the common man trust these courts when they've been denied justice for decades.

I am amazed that people are amazed

The same courts have legalized every coup
So whats amazing about one more??
The Pakistani courts and justice system are a randi khana.
 
.
This allegation of courts supporting the Estab. and Sharifs, infact, controlled and is pliable is not an allegation of Imran Khan, it was an allegation of the vast majority of the people of Pakistan...just look at the Twitter trend 'Imported Hukumat Namanzor', and read the comments, these Judges are still frozen in time, living under a rock for long.

Pakistan as a nation has changed, about time these Judges also change.
 
Last edited:
.
Lol, i mean its stupid to argue law here
Everyone knows its about danda

Supreme court ignores presdential ordinance and then runs and do sou motou at midnight..

Danda legalized all prior martial laws including mushi through courts

Another martial law..this is how it will be rembered and written


Weak prosecution is a myth
There are dozens of books of detail records that a meticulously collected

Since the cases froze last yr i told you guys that PMLN is coming in power

While Zardari is on NRO since 2018

American sponsered NRO 2.0.

The plan is to enslave our younger generation.

No free man is tolerated in power corridors. These traitor dynasties are protected by America. They can get away with anything, they know it.

In a country where COAS first has to get a NOC from America to be nominated.

It is painful to write this when this country is already finished.
 
.
The one thing to come out of this whole tragic episode is that all veils have been lifted, all myths have been dispelled, and all doubts have been resolved.
Pakistan cannot even claim to be a democratic system by any definition of the word.
Pakistan has been proven to be a feudal oligarchy, run by a corrupt and treacherous kleptocracy, propped up by a compromised military leadership, justified and protected by a sold out judicial system.
Let us not have any doubts as to what has been done to the motherland that was built on the hopes, dreams and blood sacrifices of millions.
 
.
.,.,.,

Irked by Imran Khan’s allegations, Justice Minallah asks whether PTI has trust in courts​

The IHC CJ says judges are not afraid of any campaign against judiciary; says they decide cases as per the law


By Web Desk
May 09, 2022



Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Athar MInallah.  Photo: IHC website/file
Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Athar MInallah. Photo: IHC website/file

ISLAMABAD: Irked by ousted prime minister Imran Khan’s continuous allegations against the courts, Islamabad High Court Chief (IHC) Justice Athar Minallah on Monday observed that it seems the PTI’s leadership doesn't have trust in the judiciary.

Justice Minallah issued the remarks while hearing a petition submitted by PTI’s leader Fawad Chaudhry, challenging the cases filed against Imran Khan and the top leadership of his party over the Masjid-e-Nabwi incident.
At the outset of today’s hearing, Justice Minallah noted: “Yesterday, PTI Chairman Imran Khan once again questioned why the courts were opened at 12am.”

He asked whether "PTI chairman has trust in courts or not?”

The petitioner was telling his party workers that the courts are “compromised”, noted Justice MInallah and said that they will excuse themselves from hearing the case if the petitioner does not have confidence in the court and accused the judiciary of being compromised.

The judge directed the petitioner’s counsel to take guidelines from the party’s leadership, adding that if the party does not have confidence in this bench, then they will refer the case to any other bench where they are comfortable.

He said that they did not want other important cases, including the missing persons' case, affected by the political statements made by the party’s leadership.

At this, Fawad’s lawyer Faisal Chaudhry pleaded with the court to listen to the case, considering it the case of missing persons.

“Do not undermine the missing persons' issue,” the judge told the lawyer.
The IHC CJ said that they are not afraid of any campaign against the judiciary, adding that they decide cases as per the law.

“The court had listened [Imran Khan’s] yesterday’s speech. What message was conveyed to the public?” the CJP asked. He said, "your party’s followers believe that he has a flat in Manchester."

Meanwhile, the IHC extended till May 12 the stay order that restrained the police from arresting former information minister Fawad Chaudhry and ex-PM’s aide Dr Shahbaz Gill in a case relating to chanting slogans against Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his delegation at Masjid-e-Nabwi (PBUH) in Madinah.


making things controversial themselves and then asking silly questions?

this is not judiciary, this is judges who when take suo moto out of their own liking OR taking a parchi out of a glass jar full with the selected options of their own.

and when their offices were opening at night, he should have ask himself how many times they have open offices for missing persons.

judiciary in Pakistan is for judges and not the other way round. we are losing the ethics and the root cause is parliament, who could have make these judges align to the the constitution with legislation but the stooges sitting in parliament love to play judiciary with lose ends to their cause.
 
.
This is absolute BS.

A professed trust in any court of law is NOT a criterion for seeking justice according to the relevant laws, for either the prosecution or the defense. One would assume a judge of a high court would know something as basic as that.

Just when one thinks Pakistan as a country could not sink any lower .... out come absolutely stupefying statements like this from those who should know better.
they are hiding behind cruelty of the British law towards Muslims of India living in pre-partition era. we could not even get them rid of the white wigs they wear although it was modified in the 80s to go away with the wigs.
 
.
These are same courts ranked 130th in global ranking. Imagine the scale and level of these judges just by looking at this rating. Bitcches of the riches is a very apt description of these Mofos.
 
.
East India Company and their poodles hijacked the country. It's time to get freedom from these devils.
 
. . .
.,.,.,.,
"Trust us or not." Judges should not be required to ask this question. Judges speak. You make decisions in such a way that it is clear that you are only subject to the Constitution and the law. You will sit down at midnight to hear an appeal against a dismissal that has not been dismissed.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom