yugocrosrb95
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 991
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Irony is that what you accuse and say against me applies the most to you of all people in here that is not capable of understanding simplest straightforward arguments.The nonsense here is that you are speculating on things you don't understand and you have no sense of observation and no intuition. I maintain more than ever but prediction here that I made several times and we will see the results very soon. Learn to think carefully instead of polluting this forum of speculation worthy of a school child. Iran always gives us several clues so learn to see them well
And did you notice the f-4 SM (super upgraded) in the underground bunker? I'm sure not
This is not about predicting which you desperately cling on and grasping straws on about me making a prediction when I do not, you can't comprehend that.
This is about what Iran could do more efficiently by not limiting itself on aircraft with outdated aerodynamics when it can design new airframe designs.
F-4 Phantom II is flying brick with two engines that it has are wasted on it when strength of Iranian air force/power can be improved considerably.
For each F-4 there could be two fighter jets since single engine Kfic and F-16/79 were powered by J79 thus Iran could double its fighter jet fleet.
By creating a new aircraft that is designed to carry and use AIM-23B/Fakour-90 that for now only F-14's can mount and launch.
It is downright self sabotage by maintaining outdated aircraft when having capacity to design up to date design in terms of airframe aerodynamics/kinematics.
Opportunity to reduce drag and increase range and even carrying capacity while also reducing radar cross section and improving survivability.
Later on Iran could integrate new engine once they get to the point of being able to do so.
For example when Iran made Yasin jet trainer, once FJ44 equivalent engine is developed with comparable thrust then Yasin will shine like a phoenix.