@Hack-Hook Are you an HESA shareholder or what
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes su-25,You mean Su-25 and not Su-35? I hope that was honest mistake/typo from you and Su-25 has a single pilot thus Yasin would need a change.
Another is Jahesh-700 being upscaled to provide 1500 or 1600 kilogram of thrust while fitting inside same space as Owj turbojet engine.
Then reduce fuel storage enough for new rear landing gear inside body that replaces one that is inside wing of Yasin like F-5 series.
Thus new wing can be made that is stronger and possibly lighter too, maybe even made to carry jet fuel if possible.
no but I'm not Rosoboronexport sale representative .@Hack-Hook Are you an HESA shareholder or what
Yasin is not a waste of resources and further development would make it top of the line.yes su-25,
no but I'm not Rosoboronexport sale representative .
yasin is also made by HESA and I believe its a waste of resources
and for the records HESA is a subsidiary of IAIO and both company are government owned and have no share in stock market
no but I'm not Rosoboronexport sale representative .
certainly it could be an opportunity, but it should be remembered that North Korea is subject to embargoes and total sanctions inherent in the sale of armament, therefore an alternative would be that a "derivative" of the Yasin is built directly into the DPRK. On the other hand, already in the past and more recently I think that there has been a certain form of exchange of technology and military projects and which subsequently led to local production in both countries. Just to stay in the naval artillery sector, it occurs to me that the DPRK showed a version of the Oto Melara 76/62 on its surface effect naval units (recently also with stealth turret) and this immediately got me thinking al Fajr-27; while for the 6 barrel 30mm CIWS "Kamand" Iran may have had technological help from the North Koreans, since they have long been making a very similar weapon, even if it does not have a stealth dome. Without forgetting that it seems that they use the same method to locate the target for anti-ship missiles, very often without a specific radar to guide them. Returning to the Yasin, a collaboration with the DPRK could lead, in addition to the training version, to its further development, for example also in the version with a single seat for close air support and thus retire the Mig-15/17 in many of their missions.Yasin is not a waste of resources and further development would make it top of the line.
Only major downfall for Yasin jet trainer is only usable engine for it is Owj turbojet.
They could have tried to export Yasin perhaps for example to North Korea.
It would be able to replace Mig-15 and Mig-17 based jet trainers there.
you can call me that if i promoted buying western aircraft , so your comment is baseless , but i clearly can sayNo you are a pro-western shill hellbent on weakening Iran at any given chance.
you can call me that if i promoted buying western aircraft , so your comment is baseless , but i clearly can say
You are a pro-Russia shill hellbent on weakening Iran at any given chance.
I even compare it by J-10 and JF-17 you guys only see western aircrafts . sorry i don't believe in HAL-Tejas to compare it with that aircraftYou always compare our only viable option of getting decent modern aircrafts with western counterparts, so you do simp for western manufacturers. Secondly, your pigheaded insistence on Iran going fully indegenous would be playing into the hands of your buddies in the west. Im a patriotic Iranian who has a little bit more wisdom than you do. I guess any nation that buys from another nation is a shill?! LOL you are not only a pathetic western libtard shill but a retarded one as well.
I even compare it by J-10 and JF-17 you guys only see western aircrafts . sorry i don't believe in HAL-Tejas to compare it with that aircraft
the question is what is the use of R-37m if it only can get lock on tanker size target at 100km, r-77 is capable enough if you want hit tankers at that distanceDo you guys think Russia would allow the sale of R37M BVR 200-400km range air to air missiles if there is indeed acquisition of Su-35 by Iran? Or will they only propose the R-77 export with 110km range only?
What would be the option for Iran to have increased range BVR missiles on Su-35 for instance?
the question is what is the use of R-37m if it only can get lock on tanker size target at 100km, r-77 is capable enough if you want hit tankers at that distance
do those aircrafts even have radars that can get a track 20km away.@Hack-Hook Do you think that Su-15, MiG-17 or a MiG-21-23 or A7 Corsair/F8 Crusader/EMB 314 and F-80 can shut down easily a Su-35?