Mithridates
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,897
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
bro something like this would provide iran the element of suprise. obviously in wartime saudis or israelis expect an attack from iran's direction, what they don't see is comming is an attack from indian ocean or mediterranean sea just like iraqis didn't saw it because they didn't expect that. with strategic bomber we can put together an advanced attack planning our CMs can move in complex routes and confuse enemy ADs. also you forgot about the diego garcia the unsinkable aircraft carrier that would be in our range with this.Vietnam US allies had air superiority
Iraq US allies had air superiority
Again your logic is flawed.
And if the CM can already hit all vital targets by itself, why would you need a bomber to carry it half the distance?
For example let’s say Iran wants to hit a target in Israel. It can launch from Syria, Iraq, Western Iran. Why would it need to have a bomber carry it From Iran and launch it over Syria airspace?
Not to mention as soon as the bomber is in the air all of your enemies air defense systems go on high alert and you lose the element of surprise that is vital for a CM.
So then Israel will just launch F-35 or F-18’s and go through Syria airspace and chase the bomber and bring it down.
With an aging airforce, Iran cannot defend a bomber.
bro look i am not tying to bring up something wunderweapon like u said before. i am just saying it's a feasible way to get an heavy bobmer for a country like iran cause we have all the things we need right now we just have to modify the old 747 bodies.