Iraq 2002, Iran 2012: Compare and contrast Netanyahu's speeches

[SOHEIL]

@ legend:

Read the above post and laugh at your ignorance,or you can also cry about it.

or Troll about it

 

[500]

Saddam had nuclear program, but it was destroyed by Israel in 1981.

 

[iajj]

old snake netanyahu has moulted many times, but he is still the same old, venomous snake. jews have shaped and reshaped their political rhetoric and organization many times over the past two thousand years, and they are still the same, constant harm to humanity, even more so for those living in immediate proximity to that snake den now constructed in the levant.

 

[Arabian Legend]

@ legend:

Read the above post and laugh at your ignorance,or you can also cry about it.

Iran is not fully cooperating with the IAEA regarding its nuclear sites and that includes uranium enrichment, disclosed experiment facilities and possible military dimensions.

read from page 5 to page 10.

 

[iajj]

Iran is not fully cooperating with the IAEA regarding its nuclear sites and that includes uranium enrichment, disclosed experiment facilities and possible military dimensions.

read from page 5 to page 10.

wow, i thought it was that serpentine netanyahu who was spitting all the venoms against iran, but now the saudis are trying to make the jews' case for the jews? i see so much more wisdom in my signature and myself now

 

[Mitro]

Iran's nuclear programme: the IAEA report (pdf)

Iran enriching uranium under IAEA 'surveillance'

AFP - The UN atomic agency said Monday that Iran is now enriching uranium at a new site in a hard-to-bomb mountain bunker, in a move set to stoke Western suspicions further that Tehran wants nuclear weapons.

"The IAEA can confirm that Iran has started the production of uranium enriched up to 20 percent... in the Fordo Fuel Enrichment Plant," International Atomic Energy Agency spokeswoman Gill Tudor said in a statement.

"All nuclear material in the facility remains under the Agency's containment and surveillance," the Vienna-based watchdog added.

Iran enriching uranium under IAEA 'surveillance' - NUCLEAR IRAN - FRANCE 24

Iran is not doing anything illegal ,Iran is very responsible nation

 

[FaujHistorian]

How about we "compare and contrast" Saddam Hussain and Ahmadenejat.

And see if Nejat has learned any lesson from the fate of Saddam?
Of not making $tupid statements on world stage,

Or keeping Baseej from barking foolishly?


You know I am deeply saddened when top leadership of Iran is making weird statements about Palestinian suffering while their own people are rolling down the hole of economic despair.

It is time to cut the cr@p about making statements about Israel. That county is 100s if not 1000s of miles away from Iran.

Let them live in peace and let Iran live in peace.


and that means I am going to say

peace to you all/

 

[iajj]

How about we "compare and contrast" Saddam Hussain and Ahmadenejat.

And see if Nejat has learned any lesson from the fate of Saddam?
Of not making $tupid statements on world stage,

Or keeping Baseej from barking foolishly?


You know I am deeply saddened when top leadership of Iran is making weird statements about Palestinian suffering while their own people are rolling down the hole of economic despair.

It is time to cut the cr@p about making statements about Israel. That county is 100s if not 1000s of miles away from Iran.

Let them live in peace and let Iran live in peace.


and that means I am going to say

peace to you all/

there is a difference between ahmednejad and netanyehu. if the former dresses himself better, gets a better do for his hair, tone down his fiery rhetoric and the anger in his voice, he can allow people to see that there is substance to his words.

take two main themes in his past speeches that were most demonized by the west: holocaust denial and the eradication of the jew state from the middle east. it went too far to say no bureaucratically organized killing of jews ever occured during wwii, but part of his anger is that the dirty jews have converted the death of a small number of jews into a kind of moral currency with which they now bully everyone, and holocaust denial is an understandably emotional, if not totally factually founded, response to the jews' tricks. not to mention nazi criminality never inheres in killing a few jews, so all other people feel the righteous rage at the moral frame that jews fabricated since 1945 out of a non-crime and what was largely juridical (and perhaps judicious) killing of a bunch of jews who were honestly deemed during the war deserving their deaths in the countries where the jews were killed.

likewise, the talk about erasing the jew state from the map is again an understandably emotional, if too strong and undiplomatic, response to the jews' genocide of palestinians and their proven unwillingness to co-exist with muslims in the levant. jews already worked tirelessly to undermine the very concept of coexistence of nations, and i only deem ahmednejad's words inappropriate because i consider jews' intolerance of other nations and peoples inappropriate. but at least ahmednejad, who assumed iranian presidency many decades after the jews started their killing sprees, was only responding to a long history of jew criminality and is far more pardonable by comparison.

ahmednejad, in other words, is a perfectly reasonable gentleman who only needs a better suit, better hair and better speechwriters to lend the appearance of validity to his fundamentally valid ideas.

then we have netanyhu, that jew, who conceals behind his calm voice, western sense of dress code and grooming, adopted anglo-american language and anglo-american values a completely irrational, unpredictable, maniac fear and hatred of all his neighbors. in politics as in life, we all learned (except some faux historian) to guard against this type of sociopath the most because they are most hate-filled, narcissistic, and certainly most destructive. in netanyiehu's speeches one finds as much dishonesty, deceit, hypocrisy as one finds in the posts of the faux historian

to make one last point: distance between the jew state and iran is irrelevant because jews are known to send bombers and fighters illegally across international borders, and jews never offered any gurantees that their nuclear missiles wouldn't cross international borders in the same illegal fashion (and even if they did, iranians are by no means obligated to believe words uttered by jews). it is a lot of nerve on the part of the faux historian to talk about the physical distance between the two countries in slandering iran and its peacible intentions and in being a running dog and paid apologist and propagandist of the jews.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I love that picture he hold , its like a diagram of a KG school dumbing it down to retard level ...

See this fuze.. this is burning ... and this is danger .. very DANGER ..when it comes to the circle red mark ,then its no hannaka its KABOOM .. very very very bad

 

[RFS_Br]

Saddam had nuclear program, but it was destroyed by Israel in 1981.

It wasn't definitely destroyed, quite the contrary. After Israel's attack, Saddam moved his program underground, where it quickly grew. The program was discovered by the "international community" during the Gulf War, and many were surprised to see how well-developed it was. If Saddam had waited a little longer before invading Kuwait, he would probably have created his nuke.


********************************************


As to the discussion on this thread about Iran's nuclear program -- whether it has military goals or not -- my view is that this shouldn't matter. One way or another, Iran should proceed with its program. There's no doubt that Iran's main motivation is, not aggression, like the hasbarists and neocons state, but self-defense. Iran has been under assault, direct and indirect, from the world's great powers since the revolution took place. It is one of the main potential victims of future foreign aggression, and that this is so is proven by many facts: Israel's alarmism towards Iran is one of them, and another is Iran's inclusion, along with Iraq and North Korea, in the so-called Axis of Evil. The Axis of Evil concept was meant to include countries that, apart from being unfriendly, neocons thought were key in the current geopolitical order -- by bringing them down, the US could once again assert its unrivaled superpower status. Iraq was taken down; North Korea, because of its nukes, was, and will, not. So what's the logical conclusion Iran should take from this? What's more natural, in face of its history as the bottom of foreign hostility, than Iran's desire to possess such a capability that it can stop any future aggressive moves by foreign powers against its territory? What's more, Iran's moral obligation to defend its sovereignty and people against a tragedy like that of Iraq, supersedes its commitment to the dead-letter of a hypocritical treaty like the NPT, which not even its main sponsors (the US, France and Britain) respect.

Those who say Iran should be invaded to impede its ascension to nuclear power status, are complicit in what can be a tragedy in the same proportion as that of Iraq. And equally importantly, they should understand that, by invading Iran, they will probably not bring about their stated purpose: to stall nuclear proliferation. The Iraq War itself had no effect in this sense -- it has in fact spurred some countries (e.g., Iran, North Korea and, ahem, Japan) into upgrading their programmes, so they could work as deterrent against foreign invaders. An Iran War would likewise produce the same effect, further alarming a certain number of countries against western warmongering and stimulating them, too, into pursuing or advancing their nuclear programmes.

 

[SOHEIL]

How about we "compare and contrast" Saddam Hussain and Ahmadenejat.

And see if Nejat has learned any lesson from the fate of Saddam?
Of not making $tupid statements on world stage,

Or keeping Baseej from barking foolishly?


You know I am deeply saddened when top leadership of Iran is making weird statements about Palestinian suffering while their own people are rolling down the hole of economic despair.

It is time to cut the cr@p about making statements about Israel. That county is 100s if not 1000s of miles away from Iran.

Let them live in peace and let Iran live in peace.


and that means I am going to say

peace to you all/

peace of sh!t ???

 

[asad71]

Not only Pakistan, Turkey and Iran, other Muslim nations facing massive potential threats should also acquire nuke by hook or crook. I can list out some: Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Indonesia.

Not only Pakistan, Turkey and Iran, other Muslim nations facing massive potential threats should also acquire nuke by hook or crook. I can list out some: Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Indonesia.

 

[Tshering22]

Not only Pakistan, Turkey and Iran, other Muslim nations facing massive potential threats should also acquire nuke by hook or crook. I can list out some: Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Indonesia.

You really want to cause WW3 don't you..

How about we "compare and contrast" Saddam Hussain and Ahmadenejat.

And see if Nejat has learned any lesson from the fate of Saddam?
Of not making $tupid statements on world stage,

Or keeping Baseej from barking foolishly?


You know I am deeply saddened when top leadership of Iran is making weird statements about Palestinian suffering while their own people are rolling down the hole of economic despair.

It is time to cut the cr@p about making statements about Israel. That county is 100s if not 1000s of miles away from Iran.

Let them live in peace and let Iran live in peace.


and that means I am going to say

peace to you all/

At last! Someone talks sensibly.

My friend, the Middle East would be a much more peaceful place with oil prices down if your leaders could think like you.

 

[iajj]

You really want to cause WW3 don't you..

stupid indian...imbalance of power, not nukes, cause wars, as in this case the illegal development of a nuclear arsenal by the dirty jews headed by an imbalaced, crazed netanyahoo.