What's new

Iran's recent terrorists came from kurdistan not ISIL

Gothic

BANNED
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
-5
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/11/world/middleeast/iran-kurds-terrorist-attacks.html?_r=0


Iran Kills ‘Mastermind’ of Terrorist Attacks as Inquiry Focuses on Kurds


By THOMAS ERDBRINKJUNE 11, 2017

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

While the minister did not identify the area where the operation took place, his operatives have concentrated their search on the region around the border with Iraqi Kurdistan. Iran has long had a considerable intelligence presence there, dating to before the Islamic Revolution in 1979, and the Iranians cooperate closely with the two dominant political parties that divide power in the Iraqi Kurdish region.

The man “was sent to hell by the Unknown Soldiers of the Imam of the Age,” Mr. Alavi said, using a nickname for his operatives.

Iranian investigations into the attack are increasingly focusing on a group of radicalized Iranian Kurds.

Of the five attackers, all of whom were killed, only one has been officially identified: Serias Sadeghi, an Iranian Kurd from the city of Paveh in the country’s west, near the Iraqi border, who was described as a known recruiter for the Islamic State. But security sources said they believed three of the other four attackers were also Iranian Kurds.

Sunni extremists have gained a foothold in Iran’s Kurdish areas over the last few years, according to a 2015 research paper by Iran’s Interior Ministry.

The report concluded that the ultraconservative Salafi current in Islam had attracted followers in Iranian Kurdistan and that the Islamic State had “stepped up” efforts to recruit members in the region.

The presence of ultraconservative Sunnis in the region has become much more visible, said Jalal Jalalizadeh, a former member of Parliament from Iranian Kurdistan.

“The Salafi groups have been very active in mosques and public places in Iranian Kurdistan, and even they have been socializing with families and the youths,” Mr. Jalalizadeh said, adding that the men, some wearing long beards, did not appear to pose any danger. “They were peaceful. As long as the Salafi groups are not taking arms, they must be tolerated,” he said.

Mr. Alavi, talking about terrorists in the country, said that “many teams” were under surveillance by the Intelligence Ministry. And dozens of people accused of being potential terrorists have been arrested in recent days, some in connection to the attacks on Wednesday.

0612-web-IRANmap-460.png

250 MILES

AZERBAIJAN

ARMENIA

TURKEY

TURKMENISTAN

Caspian

Sea

Predominantly

Kurdish areas

SYRIA

LEBANON

Med.

Sea

ISRAEL

AFGHAN.

IRAQ

IRAN

JORDAN

KUWAIT

SAUDI

ARABIA

Persian

Gulf

Source: Dr. M. Izady, Columbia University’s Gulf 2000 project


By The New York Times
On Sunday, six more people who were said to have direct links to terrorist groups were arrested in Iranian Kurdistan, according to Mizan, a publication of Iran’s judiciary. A safe house in Iranian Kurdistan was also raided, and suicide vests, weapons and bomb-making equipment were found, the Intelligence Ministry reported.

In Tehran, questions have been raised about the authorities’ ability to neutralize terrorist threats. Mr. Alavi said his agents faced similar challenges to security forces in Europe trying to prevent attacks.

“Terrorists do not wear a special uniform,” he said. “They are like other people, like other youths. They are not easy to recognize. Sometimes, finding a terrorist in the 14 million population of Tehran is like finding a needle — not in a haystack, but in 10 haystacks.”

The Interpreter Newsletter
Understand the world with sharp insight and commentary on the major news stories of the week.



People in the Kurdistan region say that they have seen an increasing embrace of extremist ideologies but that the government has ignored the problem.

“To us, it feels as if those Salafis can easily roam around in Iranian Kurdistan,” said Nikvan Ghaderi, 24, working in his father’s tire shop in Baneh, a small city near the border with Iraq. “I want to get as far away from these people as possible. They give us Kurds a bad name.”

Publicly, the Iranian leadership has sought to cast blame for the terrorist attacks on its favorite targets: Saudi Arabia, the United States and Israel.

But with the evidence becoming increasingly clear that the assaults were carried out by Iranian Kurds, there are concerns that ethnic tensions could mount.

On Iranian social media, some messages have singled out the Kurds, accusing them of wanting war and separation.

On Saturday, many in Saudi Arabia posted on Twitter in support of Kurdish independence, a sign to some in Iran that the Saudis are promoting the breakup of their country.

But a flood of social media posts also expressed solidarity, noting that the Kurds have played a major role in fighting the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

The Kurdish region, with about eight million people, is generally poorer than the rest of Iran, lacking jobs and investments, which analysts say could explain why some are attracted to extremism.

The Kurds are present in Parliament and in the Iranian establishment. While there is dissent among some who feel neglected by broader Iranian society, many feel a strong connection to Iran.

“Unlike other countries where Kurds live, in Iran, we are part of the social fabric, share a common history and our languages are very close to each other,” said Hiwa Aminnejad, 43, a documentary filmmaker from the Iranian Kurdish city of Sanandaj who specializes in Kurdish issues. “There is no apartheid for Kurds, like in Turkey, for instance.”

But Mr. Aminnejad said there had been increasing strains.

“Over the past 10 years, we have suddenly seen these extremists coming out of nowhere,” he said. “I feel that if there was more political openness in Iranian Kurdistan, more dialogue with us, we would not witness the rise of these extremist groups.”

Follow Thomas Erdbrink on Twitter @ThomasErdbrink.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED
 
.
https://www.theatlantic.com/news/ar...esponsible-for-isis-attacks-in-tehran/529917/


Iranian Kurds Likely Responsible for ISIS Attacks in Tehran
If confirmed, the news could represent a larger movement of Sunni Iranian Kurds attempting to overtake predominantly-Shiite Iran.

lead_large.jpg

People attend a funeral for the victims of the June 7 attacks in Tehran. TIMA / Reuters
The Atlantic Daily, our free weekday email newsletter.



In the wake of two deadly terrorist attacks that targeted the Iranian Parliament and the Imam Khomeini Mausoleum in Tehran, security sources have pointed to Iranian Kurds affiliated with ISIS as the likely perpetrators. While Iranian authorities arrested 41 people in connection to the attacks on Friday, only one attacker, Serias Sadeghi, has been identified. Sadeghi is an Iranian Kurd from Paveh, a city in western Iran, and has been cited as a prominent recruiter for ISIS in Iranian Kurdistan.

Wednesday’s attacks occurred simultaneously at around 10:30 a.m. during the middle of Ramadan, an annual, month-long observance among Muslims that commemorates the first revelation of the prophet Muhammad. It is not uncommon for ISIS to carry out attacks at this time, as militants seek “the honor of obtaining martyrdom” during “the holy month of jihad.” In the first attack, a team of four people carrying assault rifles and wearing suicide vests attempted to enter the administrative building of the Iranian Parliament. The attackers shot at some and kidnapped others, with one attacker running loose on the streets of Tehran. Eventually, one of the attackers detonated his vest, while the remaining three were killed in a shoot-out with police officers.

The second attack consisted of two people entering the Imam Khomeini Mausoleum, a tribute to the founder of the Islamic Republic that houses the remains of numerous political figures. In a nearly-identical scenario, one of the attackers, a female suicide bomber, blew up her vest, while the other was killed in a shoot-out. On Wednesday, The Guardian’s Simon Tisdall provided an analogy to explain the significance of the attack. For Iranians, he said, “the attack on Khomeini’s tomb is the equivalent of somebody trying to blow up the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.”

In total, at least 12 people were killed and 46 wounded. In a video posted Thursday on Amaq News, the ISIS media channel, five men and their leader, who some believe to be Sadeghi, claimed responsibility for both attacks. The men can be heard speaking in Arabic and Kurdish, lending credence to the all-but-confirmed theory that Iranian Kurds were behind the incident. “This is a message from the soldiers of Islamic State in Iran, soldiers of the first brigade of Islamic State in Iran which, God willing, won’t be the last,” the leader in the video says. “This brigade will mark the start of jihad in Iran, and we call on our Muslim brothers to join us.”

While the attacks represent ISIS’s first strike inside Iran, the nation has long been a suspected target of the Islamic State. In March, the group released a video saying they would “conquer Iran and restore it to the Sunni Muslim nation as it was before.” The majority of Iranian citizens are Shiites, whom ISIS regards as apostates. ISIS, on the other hand, subscribes to a strict version of Sunni Islam that comprises a mere five percent of Iran’s population. The fact that Wednesday’s attackers were most likely Sunni Iranian Kurds could signal the beginning of a larger insurgency within the nation. Indeed, that seems to be ISIS’s very goal. On Friday, Mashallah Shamsolvaezin, an Arabic affairs analyst, toldThe New York Times that “the border towns and villages and tribes along Iran’s east, west, and southern borders are poor and vulnerable to extremism,” with “young unemployed men” particularly susceptible to recruitment.

Even with ISIS claiming responsibility for the attacks, Iranian officials have been quick to blame the incident on their international rivals: Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the U.S. On Friday, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the attacks would “only increase hatred for the governments of the United States and their stooges in the region like the Saudis.” While the White House said it was “grieving and praying” over the victims of the attacks, it scornfully noted that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.” In a Thursday tweet, Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, called the statement “repugnant,” arguing that the terrorist incident was “backed by U.S. clients.” “Iranian people reject such U.S. claims of friendship,” he added.

This sentiment was shared by a number of Iranians during the nation’s prayers on Friday. The Times reports that Friday worshippers shouted “Death to Saudi Arabia” and “Death the United States, Britain, and Israel.” Meanwhile, a speaker proclaimed that “America and Saudi Arabia could not get anything from their proxy wars, so they decided to bring the war here, inside Iran.” But the problem at stake remains even bigger than this deep-seated international rivalry: In their video released Thursday, ISIS suggested that Saudi Arabia could be next.
 
. .
It is pretty clear that Kurds are asking for the same fate as houthis. This is another masacre in making only this time around iran will be the one commiting the masacres.
 
. .
surely an intelligence agency planned iranian parliament attack. it's remind me the "declassified documents of liaquat ali khan murder".... same planning but characters, roles and locations are different...

suppose if iranian intelligence agency is on the right path to investigate as pak investigated the right path of liaquat ali khan murder but never reached to come this end until declassified document came out by U.S department after 60 years of the incident in order to support afghanistan reservation over pakistan..

whoever did it they first found the haters of iran and use them against iran..

read some past history to understand,
for iranian..
for Arabs..

and for pakistanis...
 
.
June 12, 2017
|
By AFP
|
World

l_145500_091013_updates.jpg


TEHRAN: Iran has tracked down and killed several suspected militants including the alleged mastermind of twin attacks in Tehran last week, a security official and a minister have said.

Dozens of suspects have been arrested since the attacks on Wednesday killed 17 people in the first assault in Iran to be claimed by the Daesh militant group.

Police late Sunday killed four Daesh suspects in the southern province of Hormozgan, the ISNA news agency on Monday reported police chief Azizollah Maleki as saying.

"Two of the killed criminals were foreign nationals... while the identity of other members is being investigated," Maleki said, adding that weapons and a Daesh flag were seized during the raid.

Iran has said five Iranians, who had joined Daesh and travelled to its Iraq and Syria bastions, carried out Wednesday´s attacks on the parliament and the shrine of revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Late Saturday, Intelligence Minister Mahmoud Alavi said the alleged mastermind behind the attacks had been tracked down and killed outside the country.

"The mastermind who controlled the team... who had fled outside the country... paid the price for his crimes, with the cooperation of intelligence services of allied countries," Alavi told state television, without providing further details.

At least 41 Daesh suspects have been arrested since the attacks, according to Alavi, who said Iran has dismantled suspected militant cells with increasing frequency in recent months.

In the entire year to March 2017 "we dismantled 45 cells, while in the past two-and-a-half months alone we have dismantled more than 25 terrorist cells," he said.

Officials have reported the arrests of suspected Daesh members in and around Tehran, as well as in the country´s centre, southern governorates, and western provinces near the Iraqi border.
 
.
ISIS is not even able to bomb in Iraq continuously now, let alone in Iran.
But the danger is there for the Sunni Muslim Countries like Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia etc. that ISIS will bring much more destruction there as compared to Iran.
Even KSA will also not be spared by ISIS ideology.
 
. .
ISIS is not even able to bomb in Iraq continuously now, let alone in Iran.
But the danger is there for the Sunni Muslim Countries like Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia etc. that ISIS will bring much more destruction there as compared to Iran.
Even KSA will also not be spared by ISIS ideology.
bro read my first comment of this thread... could you ever think that an afghan can kill liaqat ali khan? criminal mind hired the mercenary, funded him, guided him the passage in order to hit the target. kindly understand this devil intelligence planning...
As i said in my previous comment that US disclosed "declassified documents of liaquat ali khan murder" just because of supporting afghanistan's reservation over pakistan...
this recent Recent incident proved my claim..
The drone attack came days after Afghan security officials accused the Haqqani network

Pakistan had/has only one reservation which US is not willing to understand, pakistan don't want anarchy and civil war inside pakistan and also pakistan don't want to destabilize Iran as US want to do.. because of this reservation pakistan always be in trouble..

to understand all the things you have to go in past... let me remind you some hursh history to understand.


most of people really concern that why osama bin laden found in pakistan and there were taliban's head then we should first ask a question to U.S why they strengthen those butchers? it is really easy to blame a weaker country officially but it's really hard to ask even a single hursh question officially,publicly from super power(U.S) especially if they are master to destabilize your country by spreading false propaganda around the world..
Taliban, al-quada had been created by U.S against soviet union.. Pakistan had nothing to do with it, pak always helped U.S because still pak is a weaker country economically and could'n t face the world ignorance, sanctions so pak decided to go with U.S in order to capture Osama bind laden in afghanistan. that time pakistan had long unsafe, unsecure border with afghanistan called durand line & that time pakistan never faced any attack from afghan soils therefore pakistan never considered to secure the western border so anyone could easily travel across the border... that is why taliban succeed to build many hideouts in pakistan without any permission by pak establishment & army.. but now all the hideouts are being eradicated during army operations.

we provided shelter to osama bin laden because we didn't want any anarchy and civil war inside Pakistan.. we had our rightful reservations that if we hand over OBL to US then US can withdraw it's troops soon from Afghanistan and Pakistan have to face massive terrorist attacks by taliban, so we decided to secure Duran line in 2008 during Musharraf era, first Pakistan had to secure pak-afghan border then it could be easy to handle terrorists living inside Pakistan because when we would able to cut off the chain,supply and movement of terrorist wings across the border then we can able to eradicate the inside terrorist otherwise terrorist keep on moving from one side to another.

but unfortunately instead of supporting Pak, President Bush administration interfered to not fence the durand line, U.S called this act against humanitarian because of afghan traveller those travel on daily bases (either illegally or legally). instead U.S offered to pak that they will provide technology to watch out the movement along the border but U.S never delivered that technology.. if once we achieved our target to secure Duran line we were surely gonna hand over OBL to US. but U.S killed OBL and pak had to suffer 70 thousands lives and still suffering from troubles militarily, economically and have spent about $150 billion in 16 years (more than U.S aid to pak military) . any country intelligence only think to protect own country and ISI did the same.. there were nothing wrong in it.

Some CIA agents including shakeel afridi knows the real truth and even pak secrete agency knows the truth of U.S propaganda to invade afghanistan, iraq that is the biggest reason to target Pak intelligence agency & now military by U.S influential Nations... after that U.S allowed india in afghanistan to establish indian influence with indian agency..and now india is busy for doing dirty jobs by using mercenaries against pak.
those people who blame Pakistan for everything they should have enough courage to ask the question from U.S that if they could trial saddam hussein for chemical weapons (those weapons never yet captured) then why were they so much helpless to trail OBL publicly rather then killing him? or they could even keep watching the OBL movement by using CIA agents in pakistan..




IN THE BEGINNING PAKISTAN HAS ONLY ONE CONCERN THAT WE DON'T WANT ANARCHY AND CIVIL WAR NEITHER IN OUR LAND NOR IN OUR NEIGHBOURS, BUT LOOKS LIKE U.S IS NOT WILLING TO UNDERSTAND OUR RESERVATIONS, AND THEY ALWAYS ACT AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF ONGOING COOPERATION AND INTELLIGENCE SHARING BEING DILIGENTLY UNDERTAKEN BY PAKISTAN IN ORDER TO SECURE PAKISTAN FROM ANARCHY BUT U.S RECENTLY DID DRONE STRIKE WHICH WILL CAUSE MORE ANARCHY IN PAKISTAN.

THEY ARE EVEN CREATING HURDLES TO SECURE PAK-AFG BORDER FROM BEGINNING WHICH SHOWS THAT THEY DON'T WANT PEACE IN OUR REGION.

NEED SOME INTENTION BY YOU @BHarwana
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom