US was not suggesting that. Was Iraqi speculation based on early reports from Kurdish journalists. Iran absolutely has 'Yes' men it bribes. You know it too, but are quite sick in the head and high on Iranian regime hatred towards Islam and Arabs. Even though you're a Pakistani.
Western media were endorsing this narrative. Example:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...l-erbil-northern-iraq-state-media-2022-03-12/
"Iran attacked Iraq's northern city of Erbil on Sunday with a dozen ballistic missiles in an unprecedented assault on the capital of the autonomous Iraqi Kurdish region that appeared to target the United States and its allies."
Iran is sectarian in it's policies.
Projection.
I have said and always said the doctrine of Twelver Shia Islam is not Islam. If it is, than that's suggesting the Christian doctrine on the holy spirit is true and God moves from body to body.
There's no relation between the Christian doctrine of Trinity and Shia Islamic beliefs.
Such as attributing hadeeths to Ali that Prophet Mohammed is Jesus and the Mahdi.
I never heard of such a tenet. It's an alien reading of Shia doctrine, not what authoritative Shia scholars teach.
Categorized collection of hadith (narrations) on Prophet Jesus (a) from the Shia books of Hadith. Topics include: His childhood, characteristics, the disciples, children of Israel, the Gospel, supplications to God among others.
www.al-islam.org
Or claiming the Mahdi is God's deputy on Earth. Implying God requires a deputy that shares his characteristics but in human form.
Shia Islamic scholars never claimed God "requires" anything, as if He was "not" (astaghfirallah) the only One to be infinitely omnipotent and self-sufficient. But, that He sovereignly chose to provide the faithful with a source of guidance in the form of infallible Imams (a.s.).
The Imams (a.s.) do not "share" God's characteristics in human form: God, and God only chose to endow them with certain powers like He chose to endow certain prophets with special abilities e.g. nine miracles granted to Prophet Musa (a.s.) etc.
And interpreting a Quran verse about the 'Baqiyaat Allah' to mean that the Mahdi is the remainder of Allah or a part of Allah's spirit.
Again not an accurate representation of the interpretation offered by Shia scholars. In short, Hazrate Mahdi (a.j.) is he who remains to convey pristine Islamic guidance - this is what's taught.
That's just two of many examples. Shia Muslims on other hand are Muslims if they reject certain heretical beliefs. The doctrine is unIslamic, however.
Reported for sectarianism.
@waz @Irfan Baloch
Please stop this type of sectarianism where Shia Islam is portrayed as non-Islamic and heretical. Thank you.
Targeting doesn't mean cursing. It means spreading misinformation about them, slandering them, and hating them. And denying Aisha's innocence which is mentioned in Quran. Essentially rejecting God's revelation and putting your hate above his revelation. All over a war Arabs had with Persia.
Innocence in what matter, exactly? The Holy Quran does not proclaim her infallibility sui generis.
And sure, Aisha is a representative of the Arab nation, but the Ahlul Beyt somehow aren't... There's no logic in this sort of a contention.
Iran is not fighting any enemies of Islam. Whatever enemies of Islam means. Enemies of Islam aren't just foreign entities. Pop culture is enemy of Islam , so is shirk which twelver Islam promotes and practices. Or propaganda.
Iran is fighting them.
Such as promoting Iranian regime as God's literal saints on Earth. That can't do anything wrong. As if they're Prophets.
This would be an incorrect assertion as well. Shia Islam does not make such a claim, nor do any Iranian state officials. According to Shia Islam only fourteen individuals are infallible by God's Will (Prophet (s), Fatima Zahra (a.s.) and Twelve Imams (a.s.)). Every other human does make mistakes and isn't free of sins, including Iranian state officials.
But, this doesn't mean we shouldn't be governed by a qualified Islamic jurisprudent as long as Imam Mahdi (a.j.) remains in occultation. This jurisprudent, Vali ol-Amre Moslemin is then the vice-regent. Not infallible, but still the legitimate supreme political authority in the absence of the Imam.
You know what's funny is Iran and it's proxies in Iraq tolerate this sale of Iraqi oil to Israel.
Tolerating would imply that they are in control of the KRG.
They never seek to regain sovereignty of Iraqi state over it's oil and land.
More than anyone else in Iraq.
They just want to kill and exercise power over Arab Sunni Muslims.
No.
They are okay with Israel , US , and EU satisfying their interest in Iraq. As long as US ,EU and Israel satisfy Iran's interest in Syria .
Zio-American interests are frontally conflicting with Iranian ones in Iraq and Syria.
Which is why NATO and the zionists manufactured "I"S(IS) to destabilize both nations. Which is why current Iraqi social movements and politicians opposed to Iran are all openly backed by and aligned on the US, the EU or their regional client states, and in some cases even on Isra"el". In Syria, the insurgency to overthrow the Iranian-allied government in Damascus was engineered and supported by the US, the EU and Isra"el" from the beginning to the end.
By the way, there's no legitimate entity by the name of Isra"el" at this time. Those who use this designation in reference to the zionist regime without quotation marks and thereby legitimize its status should not be projecting their stance on those who don't.
