Iran's Hormoz-2, worlds first anti-radiation ballistic missile

[OldTwilight]

It's the only one because everyone else knows how stupid of an idea it is. Once the missiles are launched the receiving nation has no clue if they are anti-radiation or nuclear so they will launch their how arsenal. In an attempt to destroy a radar you have your whole CPU try destroyed. Will someone try talking sense into these reactionary guards?

this is war ... you simply forget that .... you have two choice in war , kill him or get killed by him ...

 

[Godman]

what will you do as a hindi?

what will you do as hindi?

@Śakra is most likely a Tamil

 

[Fawadqasim1]

A stationary target that is 1/20th the size of an aircraft carrier, mind you.




It would only make sense that it is capable of this. Ships don't sit still when targeted by missiles, and Iranian engineers know this.



Strictly speaking, the Khalij Fars is actually a quasi-ballistic missile. It follows a much shallower trajectory, which allows it to retain aerodynamic control in flight. As for aerodynamic control, it has 3 sets of fins (1 at the nose, 2 at the tail), at least 2 of which (including the nose fins) are moveable. In comparison to most ballistic missiles (including most Iranian ones) which have just 1 set of fins at the tail.

All images of the Fateh series of missiles indicate that the warhead does not separate from the main fuselage, though there is some speculation that the most advanced land variant, the Zolfiqar missile, may have a seperating warhead.

Whole missile, not just warhead.

that's impressive

It's the only one because everyone else knows how stupid of an idea it is. Once the missiles are launched the receiving nation has no clue if they are anti-radiation or nuclear so they will launch their how arsenal. In an attempt to destroy a radar you have your whole CPU try destroyed. Will someone try talking sense into these reactionary guards?

they won't be able to respond before they receive the package no strike or counter strike system is that quick under the sun.

 

[AmirPatriot]

It's the only one because everyone else knows how stupid of an idea it is. Once the missiles are launched the receiving nation has no clue if they are anti-radiation or nuclear so they will launch their how arsenal. In an attempt to destroy a radar you have your whole CPU try destroyed. Will someone try talking sense into these reactionary guards?

Iran doesn't have nukes so there is no issue of thinking they are nuclear.

 

[Penguin]

No need to do that !!!
Won't change the truth...

I always keep an open mind. However, if you claim CEP is less then 100m (as you appear to do), then please either give a good argument why you think that is so, or refer to the sources backing your claim. We can all make all sorts of claims. That don't make them true.

 

[mohsen]

I always keep an open mind. However, if you claim CEP is less then 100m (as you appear to do), then please either give a good argument why you think that is so, or refer to the sources backing your claim. We can all make all sorts of claims. That don't make them true.

Error is less than 10 meter, CEP is 2 meter:

 

[Śakra]

@Śakra is most likely a Tamil

I believe you've mistaken me for @kvpak

 

[Fawadqasim1]

we might need these type of missiles against indian abm radars sir please respond
@The Deterrent

 

[Penguin]

A stationary target that is 1/20th the size of an aircraft carrier, mind you.

Roughly speaking, looking at length x beam, a Arleigh Burke Flight 2A is 1/8th and LCS-1 Freedom class is 1/12th the area of CVN Ford. If you look at full load displacement, AB2A is 1/11th and LCS-1 Freedom is 1/29th that of CVN Ford.

It would only make sense that it is capable of this. Ships don't sit still when targeted by missiles, and Iranian engineers know this.

The CVN and DDG are capable of 'in excess of 30kn' (likely somewhere around 35kn Vmax at best), while LCS-1 Vmax is 47kn. Ever seen footage of these ships pulling high speed turns? Quite impressive.

Strictly speaking, the Khalij Fars is actually a quasi-ballistic missile. It follows a much shallower trajectory, which allows it to retain aerodynamic control in flight. As for aerodynamic control, it has 3 sets of fins (1 at the nose, 2 at the tail), at least 2 of which (including the nose fins) are moveable. In comparison to most ballistic missiles (including most Iranian ones) which have just 1 set of fins at the tail.

All images of the Fateh series of missiles indicate that the warhead does not separate from the main fuselage, though there is some speculation that the most advanced land variant, the Zolfiqar missile, may have a seperating warhead.

Whole missile, not just warhead.

I.e. an guided artillery rocket.

 

[AmirPatriot]

The CVN and DDG are capable of 'in excess of 30kn' (likely somewhere around 35kn Vmax at best), while LCS-1 Vmax is 47kn. Ever seen footage of these ships pulling high speed turns? Quite impressive.

And the Khalij Fars/Hormuz missile goes at over Mach 3.

I.e. an guided artillery rocket.

I don't care if its a guided dildo to be perfectly honest, the facts are that it has a 300 km range, flies at over Mach 3 and has a 650 kg warhead.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

Is it a quasi ballistic missile?

Roughly speaking, looking at length x beam, a Arleigh Burke Flight 2A is 1/8th and LCS-1 Freedom class is 1/12th the area of CVN Ford. If you look at full load displacement, AB2A is 1/11th and LCS-1 Freedom is 1/29th that of CVN Ford.



The CVN and DDG are capable of 'in excess of 30kn' (likely somewhere around 35kn Vmax at best), while LCS-1 Vmax is 47kn. Ever seen footage of these ships pulling high speed turns? Quite impressive.

I.e. an guided artillery rocket.

This hair pin turn is impressive to say the least

 

[mohsen]

And the Khalij Fars/Hormuz missile goes at over Mach 3.

Between Mach 4 and 5.

 

[AmirPatriot]

Between Mach 4 and 5.

Source?

 

[Itachi]

I appreciate your sense of humour and innocence

Where in my original post was there humor or innocence?

Source?

Fateh-110 In 2004, the 2nd gen. Fateh-110 was reported at 3.7 mach (we don't know if it was terminal or boost phase speed; probably terminal) so newer gen. of these BM's should be over 3 or 4 mach.

 

[mohsen]

Source?

The video in my previous comment.