1. The mullahs came to power through force...not elections. One cannot say that the supreme leader can be "voted" out.
2. Religious leaders are very hard to overthrow....Since religion is extremely personal to people, one tends not to go against religion. Hence an egyp type revolution is not possible in Iran. Only through strong elected leadership and robust economic development can a politician wrest power to challenge religious leaders. As of now, the Church and State are part and participle of Iranian politics and not changing anytime soon....
PS: My parents always fondly mention the Iran of the Shah era. It was a progressive, liberal state that became the envy of the region.
Of course not to mention how beautiful the Iranian people are....Any Sarah Shahi fans here?
yeah better you get some knowledge before you claim to be an expert of our country
1/ mullah is a religious person. mullah doesn't mean someone in political position
my grand father was a mullah and he is loved by the people because he always spent his life to help
he finished his life terribly poor because he didn't feel religion would be make money
today it changed for some of them BUT NOT ALL mullahs
1/ it was a referendum that people choosed
so better you get some knowledge
it is an election for the president BUT ;..
at khatami time we were so many to go for vote that khamenei couldn't do anything
the fact is that he choosed to organiza cheat by controlling the organs that would make him choose who is the president and be able to cheat the elections
2/ it is not only about some religious in power
about it the grand ayatollahs the most known and followed ... like Montazeri.. wanted a change
many of the religious figures i know are pro green. some not some yes.
so stop thinking religious is a hell
no it is like any dictatorship led by a guy. religion is a tool . when you see how they are corrupted , they didn't respect the basics our morality teached by our religion, i cannot understand how we can name this republic "islamic republic"
anyway i believe like Khomeiny said himself at the beginning: economy for specialists, and so on. religious only care about religion. the bad point is that there was a leader that he can see the morality in any law... from morality it became the power
your parents appreciated the shah. yes economy was good but this guy was a dictator. never heard about savak?
he didn't want democracy : you can even read it from a royalist writer "Nahavandi" who is living in France
anyway you can be beautiful and stupid. what's the matter with being beautiful to speak about civilization?
lol