Iranians surround Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's car in poverty protest

[xdrive]

Now lets compare this Iranian video with what happens in western word when protesters want to talk with their leaders:

You are a liar and a big one. This is what happens when protesters who are fighting for their basic human rights want to talk with their prime minister in Australia. Note that the bigoted western media deals with the situation like a bigot and condemns the protesters. In Iran atleast you can can walk up to president and talk to him without fearing bodyguard dogs to punch you in the face:

You obviously have no idea what happened in that incident, so it's pretty stupid of you to use such a poor example or even try to compare it to the Iranian incident. It can't be compared to the incident involving the Iranian president as the situations are different.

If you wish to discuss that particular incident, go to the relevant thread, otherwise stay on topic.

Thanks.

 

[Serpentine]

Question for the regime-supporters here: on which side are you guys? We all know Ahmadinejad en Khamenei are in a power-struggle, but which person you morally support?

First: they are not in power struggle.they had some different ideas in some issues.That doesn't mean they are fighting for power.
second: Ahmadinejad is in office only for 1 year ahead and someone else will replace him.He did some very good jobs.But i don't agree with some of his policies,in economics,culture and foreign affairs.

 

[xdrive]

Iranains are suffering because of homophilic western countries including AUS put up snactions on the iranian people for 3 decades. Ignorant and shameless fools don't have to cry
crocodile tears for iranians as they have done remarkably well and achieved a lot since
1979. If your racist dacoit country was in place of iran, you aussies would have gone
extinct.

No, pretty much every country in the UN, not just western countries, have sanctions against Iran because Iran seeks to get nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.

Sanctions are the only effective way of disrupting this besides going to war.

 

[longbrained]

You obviously have no idea what happened in that incident, so it's pretty stupid of you to use such a poor example or even try to compare it to the Iranian incident. It can't be compared to the incident involving the Iranian president as the situations are different.

You are right. How can we compare Iranians with white Aussies. Afterall you are the "superior" race. In the video the survivors of the Australian genocide demand their rights. The survivor of a people who own that continent. But of course they are always massacred, tortured and killed. We can not compare that to Iran which is under the sanctions and threat of war with its president going and streets and talking to people.

By the way what is your handle on "stormfront" forum?

 

[lem34]

Its amazing that they were allowed to get that close to the President.

You are right. How can we compare Iranians with white Aussies. After you are the "superior" race. In the video the survivors of the Australian genocide demand their rights. The survivor of a people who own that continent. But of course they are always massacred, tortured and killed. We can not compare that to Iran which is under the sanctions and threat of war with its president going and streets and talking to people.

By the way what is your handle on "stormfront" forum?

I thought Australians were decedents of thieves and deviants??

 

[Surenas]

First: they are not in power struggle.they had some different ideas in some issues.That doesn't mean they are fighting for power.
second: Ahmadinejad is in office only for 1 year ahead and someone else will replace him.He did some very good jobs.But i don't agree with some of his policies,in economics,culture and foreign affairs.

Well, they are definitely in a power-struggle. There is no doubt about it.

Which policies you don't agree with?

 

[fd24]

Question for the regime-supporters here: on which side are you guys? We all know Ahmadinejad en Khamenei are in a power-struggle, but which person you morally support?

A figment of you imagination - YOU want their to be a "power struggle" because it suites your desires. Morally what is YOUR intention with this line of questioning? Do you want to pretend their to be a rift so to take advantage of the Zionistic views?
I dont necessarily agree with everything Ahmadinejad has done - like most leaders he may have made errors - but on the whole he has done more good things than bad. I wish Pakistan had a leader with his strength and balls.
Iranian issues and internal political issues are a matter for Iranians to decide and in due course will - NOT by external force or pressures...

 

[lem34]

No, pretty much every country in the UN, not just western countries, have sanctions against Iran because Iran seeks to get nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.

Sanctions are the only effective way of disrupting this besides going to war.

Sanctions are not effective at all

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2010-03-05.asp

 

[longbrained]

Question for the regime-supporters here: on which side are you guys? We all know Ahmadinejad en Khamenei are in a power-struggle, but which person you morally support?

Disagreements between political leaders is a good sign and shows a healthy political environment where competition for new ideas are tolerated. It is only when there is no disagreement that you have to be suspicious that dictatorship has taken hold. In Iran case the two have different posts and different responsibilities so it is only natural to have some different ideas about something. This does not mean that Iran is going to civil war. Ahmadinejad is just positioning himself to have his own favorite candidate elected in next election. Other political parties are trying to do the same. It is natural to see this in democracies. But ofcourse what you would know about democracy living in a country that thrives with a racist culture and rise of neo-Nazi classes.

 

[Surenas]

^ My question was meant for Iranians, not for non-Iranians.

 

[longbrained]

Its amazing that they were allowed to get that close to the President.



I thought Australians were decedents of thieves and deviants??

Descendants of fascists, slave traders, child molesters (molesting aboriginal children) and criminals who used to be sent there from UK. Their history is really pathetic. No wonder racism still thrives there and white people regularly kill others based on color of skin. It is one shameful country with a dark past and not much of a future.

 

[Mosamania]

My heart goes for the poor Iranian people suffering from the draconian dictatorial regime that is oppressing them

 

[longbrained]

^ My question was meant for Iranians, not for non-Iranians.

You are on a Pakistani forum.

 

[fd24]

My heart goes for the poor Iranian people suffering from the draconian dictatorial regime that is oppressing them

Mosa - i think you are posting on the wrong thread dude - this is not about the House of Saud.....

 

[longbrained]

My heart goes for the poor Iranian people suffering from the draconian dictatorial regime that is oppressing them

Your heart only supports terror. We know you very well. The hijackers of 9/11 were Saudis. All terror in Pakistan has its root in Saudi Arabia. Our heart only goes to the victims of the terror you breed.