Irani
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
It seems that you agreed to the lawyer being opportunistic, shouldn't that be a reason enough for a mistrial and the accused to be retried?
that's the defendant responsibility to choose a competent layer, bad lawyer is not going to give anyone anywhere in the world new chance of trial.
but I think her conviction is not final (I'm not sure) Iran judiciary system had several appeals opportunity (4 or 5 different courts one after another).
this kind of cases are really rare and relative to the circumstances they prepare the suitable measures. Usually the testimony happena in one session so you need to invite them one by one to the hall and separate them before and after the testimony.Are the witnesses held in judicial custody while the trial is going on? If not, are they not allowed to be in contact?
I never claimed that. I simply said that Islam do not favor such a thing and predicted all the measures to prevent it but if you insisted on bringing your privacy to the public then there would be your fault. In your privacy you are on your own and your god, do what ever you want.So you agree that this woman shouldn't be stoned to death and this case shouldn't have come up in the first place?
For judging about this case we need to study the dossier then we could reach to a fair conclusion.