Philosopher
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
- Messages
- 3,683
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
It's a copy lol Making it bigger doesn't change shit.
If system A and system B are different, then they cannot by definition be consider 'copies'.
Moreover, Shahed 136 is more capable than your harpy in almost every way imaginable. Your harpy is frankly a little toy in comparison. It's not just about the size, but capacility. One example, Harpy has a range of about 200km whereas the Shahed 136 has a range of around 2500km. Like I told you earlier, it's satirical to even try to compare these UAVs.
Same concept.
That's not really saying anything. It's like saying F-22 and SU-57 have the same concept.
China copied our Harpy and created the ASN301, and you copied theirs.
See my first comment.
You're nothing, no innovation, just bastardization of existing designs.
Given that Shahed-136 is more capable than your harpy in every important parameter, this comment makes zero sense. Moreover, Iranians essentially created the concept of attack UAVs as far back as the early 80's.
Your drones even use western parts lmao.
I would explain to you the economics behind using off the shelf hardware but I hardly doubt you have the capacity to understand.
Harpy/Harop are battle tested,
Proof?
they blew up a warehouse with a bunch of Shaheds inside Iran lmao,
Some terrorists based in Iran used quadcopter to damage the roof of a facility and you've translated this into Israel using its harpy UAV to destroy a shahed facility?
I think it's best you go take your pills bro.
Last edited: