Beny Karachun
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 6,521
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Not more people retard, more students in STEM fields, Iran has way more of them than Nigeria, Pakistan or Bangladesh.Lol Jew you got defensive.
This is the 2021 STEM R&D data. Iran is ranked 14th globally by nonself citations. Out of this list of 14, Iran ranks at 5th population. Actually France, Italy, germany, Iran have similar populations. If we go by your jew-level theory that some country gets more cited then a country like Bangladesh or Pakistan, Nigeria should be ranked at no. 4-5 because they have more people according to your BS logic.
View attachment 857828
In an R&D world, there are multiple ways to check research quality. I am telling you this from experience, (I have 16 years of experience in EU as an engineering researcher/academician, got my masters from Iran, PhD from EU).
- No. of non self-citations: This tells how many people in the world read your research and deemed it useful enough for their own research so they cited it. Higher the non self citation count, more important was your work otherwise it would not get that much attention. Because it literally tells us that so many people in the field globally deemed it important enough to cite it. There is never any regional trend in the citations as well. Pick any paper Q1/Q2 category paper on RG or google scholar/Scopus and see its cited information. You will find Nigerians, Canadians and then Chinese, Argentines citing it. Iranian paper are no exception. For non western nations this metric is the best one.
- H-index: It works too and western system prefers it but its a very biased system because most of the high impact research journals in STEM fields are from the west and they do not easily publish research work from east (except Japan, China, Korea) unless someone just invents something out of the world. The editors mostly prefer western authorship which is one of the reasons research groups in east prefer to have collaborations with western groups to enhance their publication quality. Again this metric has nothing to do with population. Politics play its part too. I knew a brilliant Serbian colleague (now a tenured professor) whose paper was not being entertained from Serbia by a top notch American Journal. He later published the same work from our research institute in EU in the very same journal with literally no change.
- No. of SJR registered published articles: Thats the most crude way of checking quality of research. You can basically pick low quality journals which are atleast SJR registered in Q4 category and keep on publishing in it to increase your count (most mid tier academicians globally take this route). Some professors even in western countries promote their students to fill their CV's this way which is one of the reasons Q3-Q4 category journals have the HIGHEST frequencies of issues because they are in demand by larger body of researchers.
Iranian dominance is based upon nonself citations. SJR is ranking iran that high means the journals iranian scientists publish their work in are atleast SJR registered (Q1-Q4) and globally STEM scientists deem that work important enough to cite it otherwise they would have. Now you can cry me a river of jew ash, protest against it, start name calling but it wont change, like holocaust cant be reversed.
Citations is a BS metric,
Most Innovative Countries 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
The Bloomberg Innovation Index
Bloomberg's 2015 ranking of the world's 50 most innovative countries.
www.bloomberg.com
Israel is top 7, Iran top 60, you really are a joke if you think number of citation is a metric for R&D quality