The content and pictures of both threads are exactly the same. No need spamming this section with duplicates of Iranian paint job bragging.
That thread was taken off track, by yourself no less. I created this thread to allow for more constructive comment and here you are again with your "pain job" comments to try and inflame. If you're not trying to inflame, then refrain from such comments.
Btw
@Philosopher, I am not trolling. You need to ask yourself, are small incremental improvements in reverse-engineered products worth to talk about?
When you call a system that uses a completely different engine, seeker, warhead, etc a "repainted" C-802, then then do you truly not realise you're coming across as a troll? Or Shall I assume you're simply plainly unaware and in genuine need for being informed?
Iran claims to have made incremental improvements in its weaponry every other day. Imagine the flooding of threads if they all were posted.
My friend,
Did you check the title of this thread? I posted information regarding next generation systems coming online, i.e supersonic systems. Furthermore, these improvement you see were significant enough to warrant a thread, as were the context in which they were shown in. You are in a defence forum, every little improvement is important for members to know. If you are no interested, then you are not obliged to enter these threads.
Let's talk about that kind of news, not these slightly improved knock-off products of Chinese missiles.
Perhaps instead of making accusation such as "knock-off", come into these threads with a more positive mindset and ask members to inform you. Iran once upon a time imported some Chinese missiles, today those missiles may in some cases share shells, but everything else is different. If you disagree, then post your analysis for me to see.