Stop this none sense about foreign powers inciting the current situation. There is no foreign interference because if there was, you would have seen the evidence. Your ideological warriors would have lost half the country by now. The situation would be a lot worse. When Raisi came to power, he turned up the ratchet on the so called islamic hijab and the morality police started to pressure and arrest women. He lit the match. He is a known murderer behind the 1988 political mass killings. I am surprised he was even allowed to the united nations.
Read my comments again, you're misquoting me. But yes, of course there's foreign interference in the current situation as well. If alone through the endless propaganda foreign outlets bombard Iranians with to incite violence against public authorities, if alone through the spies and snipers operating on Iranian soil, if alone through the reformist fifth column of the west, if alone through NATO's and the zionists' terrorist stooges murdering worshippers.
The so called committed army of loyal ideological warriors will scatter like pigeons when they start dropping death. The cowards run now when a crowd of empty handed people march towards them. How much do you get paid to spread this none-sense?
Mere demagogy. Warriors who, without adequate armament stood against Saddam's Iraq propped u by two superpowers, warriors who eliminated "I"SIS, warriors who've held in check the world's so-called superpower for over four decades, who trained and equipped successful Resistance forces against zionist occupiers, will easily overcome wannabe insurgents should they try anything funny.
the only reason this regime has lasted is not because it is so great, it is because the Americans have wanted them to stay in power. Why would not they, the are the best salesman for the American arms industry. If the Americans wanted, they would bomb your million man ideological army to the stone age. The Russians are getting their asses handed to them and you think shills like you will last forever. The Chinese want them to stay so they can be part of their new belt and road initiative which is Chinese version of Colonialism. The corrupt regime has already capitulated to the Chinese so they can stay in power. Without Chinese buying oil, your super ideological fighters would not last three months.
USA arms sales to their PGCC clients had been rising steadily before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. If PGCC rulers had the power to say "no" to Uncle Sam, then they would have to be cretins of the highest order not to grasp something you believe to have "discovered", namely that their allies in Washington are supposedly taking them for a ride by "allowing the Islamic Republic to stay in power just to frighten them". If however they do not have that ability, then the USA regime has no need to rely on such an elaborate scheme in the first place: a simple phone-call will be enough for the Yanks to have their subordinates oblige and purchase as many weapons as needed. Elementary logic makes this farcical theory fall flat.
The reason the USA regime has not dared to launch military aggression against Islamic Iran, a government which has challenged and damaged their interests like no other in West Asia and beyond, is because they cannot stomach the colossal costs they'd incur as a result of Iran's asymmetrical retaliation power.
Russia is slowly but surely grinding down a major NATO proxy on its borders. Though to be honest, I'm at a loss as to what the conflict in Ukraine has to do with me personally.
China buying oil from Iran is not synonymous with Iran subjecting itself to Chinese "colonial rule". There's nothing of the sort going on. This is not the pre-Revolution era, when the country's ruler had his palace bugged by listening devices (as suggested in the memoirs of his Court Minister Alam), or his Prime Minister chosen by the White House (as when USA president Kennedy directed the shah to attribute this function to Ali Amini).
The reason the Pahlavi monarchy was ousted was because of khomeini's promise that he was going to fight the Russians in Afghanistan ( the green belt) and Shah's refusal. If the Shah had any fucking brains, he would have built universities with the oil money so people would not have been so stupid to believe a picture of khomeini is on the moon. The Cinema Rex fire ,which was conducted by an Islamist, was the match that lit the last revolution. It was the tragic event at Cinema Rex which was blamed on Savak. The country erupted in anger.
The shah was the perfect American client. Officially acting as the regional "gendarme" as per the Nixon doctrine, purchasing tons of overpriced weaponry specially tailored to counter the Soviets, participating in expeditions on behalf of the west (like when Iranian troops were sent to crush the Dhofar rebellion in Oman) and so on.
Islamic Iran's support for Afghan mojahedin was part of a broader policy of struggle against both imperialist blocs of that time, reflected in the slogan 'neither East nor West'. Revolutionary Iran's Resistance against NATO imperialism led to western backing for Saddam's war of aggression.
Whether it happens now or ten years from now, people are sick and tired this regime. Like I said before, stand aside and watch how the crowds with will be ten fold the fake bussed in crowds.
What has Islam brought to Iran that is so great? Nothing. You are delusional if you think the youth are faithful to Islam. You should take down the Iranian flag . " what is good for Islam"
Islam and Iran are inseparable. The advent of Islam in Iran ushered in what historians refer to as the Islamic Golden Age. You can read up on it.
Show me one Islamic country that is leading the world in anything that is positive for humanity.
Innovation? No
Medical advancement? No
Modern medicine? No
Military technology? No
Technology? No
How about human rights? What a joke . absolutely NO
How about Jurisprudence? No
They all operate under some archaic tribal system of the illiterate bedouins from the stone age
Such ranting hardly warrants a response. There are threads in this forum dedicated to the considerable development registered by several Islamic nations in recent years, and especially Iran. Suffice to study them.
The west's current position is a result of brutal colonial exploitation and is rapidly nearing its end with the rise of multipolarism.
Tell me, how has life improved in Iran since the revolution for average Iranians?
is standard of living better? no . more than half the country live below poverty
In numerous ways. The first of which being that Iran gained back her self-determination, her sovereignty after shaking off the zio-American imperial yoke thanks to the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Literacy increased massively, infrastructural development bloomed, science and technology reached unprecedented heights in the contemporary era, Iran turned into an industrial nation.
As concerns standards of living, yes, they did improve. Here's a documented study on the subject:
Why the claim that the average standard of living has fallen since the revolution is false.
djavadsalehi.com
If you gave Iranians today an option to leave, half the country would leave. Why?
Because Iran is victim to the most extensive, most intense, most underhanded propaganda, psy-ops and social engineering campaign in human history, carried out by the world's most resourceful powers to be.
There are no legal restrictions for Iranians to leave. Yet Iran's emigrant community, numbering between 2 and 3,5-4 million at most, is not particularly large. Countries like south Korea, Turkey and many others have a superior percentage of their people living abroad.
Only paid shills like you boast about islam and how great this fucking hell on earth is some great utopia.
Stop the silly ad hominems. Two can play this game, but I do not wish to engage into such.