What's new

Iranian President Declares Joint Border Force With Pakistan


What you have chosen to conveniently overlook is the difference in narrative from pulling Indias line by Nawaz to entirely the other end of spectrum in clearly defining and explaining Pakistan's own narrative as a matter of fact that Indian sponsored terrorist pigs infiltrate both sides of the border between Pakistan and Iran (through Afghanistan).

Instead of running with the lame Indian propaganda, read the explanation in the above context and it become crystal why PM IK felt the need to visit Iran:


The chief executive also brought his counterpart's attention to the April 18 terror attack in Ormara, in which 14 armed forces personnel were martyred. He said he understands that Iran had also suffered from terrorist attacks by groups operating within Pakistan, but stressed that the issues need to be resolved before they push the two countries apart.

You have also conveniently missed is the part where PM said, our "security chief" will sit with his Iranian counterpart and discuss ways of cooperation so that the countries, "reach a level of trust such that both countries will not allow any terrorist activity from their soil".

@PakSword @Farah Sohail @IceCold @Tps43 @war&peace @Zibago @BHarwana @Khafee

(Edit: @The Eagle I just read your post mention these junkies →) People like Talat Hussain and other such self styled intellectuals should first understand the basic difference before unknowingly jumping up and down on Indian narrative bandwagon.

The difference between what Nawaz accused Pakistan establishment for harboring groups against India is clearly pulling indian narrative and what IK has identified as Indian sponsored terrorists who infiltrate and operate in Pakistan and Iran border, is completely the opposite of Nawaz.

Aren't the terrorists pigs who attacked and martyred 14 armed forces personnel fulfilled the very Indian interests we are trying to counter or not?
 
Last edited:
. .
double game once again

don't be fooled
new US Policy and ambassador KhalilZad is to isolate Pakistan and affect its economy

I can a show Pakistanis none one in Islamic Republic is been fooled

the trip had no one out come, none whatsoever economic benefit for Pakistan as nothing been signed that worth anything

labaik ya The Pivot



here is
Mr. Saifullah Chattha, Chief Secretary, State Balochistan, Pakistan in May 2014 said Quote "Pakistan has already arrested big terrorist Abdul Sattar Rigi, he has already been arrested and we have informed the government Iran that he has been arrested" end Quote


still till today's he is launching attack and continuously his speaking freely to western media
and boast about his operations
he walk around freely today and been released if he was arrested
 
Last edited:
.
You should read this post.
I know that context about balochi sunnis on both side of the border very well. India is only taking advantage of it and building on those concerns of Iran. I completely understand the reasons of IK visit and how civil military is working in that direction on the same page together.

My previous post is adressing the false propaganda of opportunists who are trying to score cheap local political points against Imran Khan all be it at the cost of maligning national interest.
 
.
They are just few patches as @Sugarcane said, and the one barking against it must have illegal business with Mullah smugglers.

sometime you act very pathetic and this thread is perfect example of it.


Well, they don't have 100 feet high concrete wall, if that is what your idea of fence is but if you look at Google Earth it's clear they have done far more on their side compared to nothing on our side.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080706034537/http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DAH337249.htm

‘Anti-Baloch’ wall on Pak-Iran border opposed
shim.gif

shim.gif

shim.gif

QUETTA: The Leader of the Opposition in Balochistan Assembly, Kachkol Ali, Advocate, on Sunday demanded an immediate change of Balochistan Governor because of his "anti-Baloch policies" and strongly opposed the construction of a wall on the Pak-Iran border.

Addressing the media at the MPA Hostel here on Sunday, Kachkol Ali said, "Governors of Balochistan and Sistan Balochistan are not our well-wishers," adding that he had tabled an adjournment motion in the House about the Gold Smith Line on May 26 in which it was made clear that an unnatural line had been drawn against the will and desire of the Baloch nation. Now the construction of a 10-feet high and four-feet wide wall has been started, which is creating difficulties for the Baloch people.

He said excesses were being committed against the Baloch since 1948 in West Pakistan. The building of this wall would futher divide the Baloch families. He said the Germans had built a wall, which was demolished. But neither the Pakistani nor the Iranian Baloch were taken into confidence over the construction of the wall along the Gold Smith Line. "We demand that the construction of the wall should be stopped immediately."

Kachkol Ali said if a war took place between Iran and America, the Baloch would be the worst sufferers as the soil and the sea in these areas belong to the Baloch people.

He said that Deputy Speaker Aslam Bhotani had disposed off his adjournment motion in his one-sided action.

Kachkol said if the assembly did not resolve the problems of the Baloch, what was the use of such an assembly. He said the ruling of the Speaker against the adjournment motion was against the people and democratic interest. He appealed to the international organisations to save the Baloch people.

He said Baloch were a nation by all means and definitions with a rich cultural heritage spreading over thousands of years. He said in 1800, Balochistan was divided due to Gold Smith Line.

To a question, he said his party members in the Senate would also discuss this issue in the House.

"We pay tributes to Governor Kandahar who has said Baloch from Balochistan are his guests." He, however, added that if the Governor of Sistan came to Balochistan again, they would hold protests.
 
.
That's daddy's private army sucking on federal funds
I don't think it is costy... Forces are already stationed for the same purpose... So they just move and consolidate them in one joint force...and Iran does its share in it... A bargain for that much benefit.. U already pay for forces there but to little success... so I think it is less burden on Fed funds if u think about it again...
 
.
He said he understands that Iran had also suffered from terrorist attacks by groups operating within Pakistan, but stressed that the issues need to be resolved before they push the two countries apart.


This is where he made a blunder. Now the rabid Indian and international media gonna cherry pick his statement and will make headlines

"pak p.m admit of Terror outfits operating inside Pakistan"

These type of talks are done behind closed doors

double game once again

don't be fooled
new US Policy and ambassador KhalilZad is to isolate Pakistan and affect its economy

I can a show Pakistanis none one in Islamic Republic is been fooled

the trip had no one out come, none whatsoever economic benefit for Pakistan as nothing been signed that worth anything

labaik ya The Pivot



here is
Mr. Saifullah Chattha, Chief Secretary, State Balochistan, Pakistan in May 2014 said Quote "Pakistan has already arrested big terrorist Abdul Sattar Rigi, he has already been arrested and we have informed the government Iran that he has been arrested" end Quote


still till today's lhe is launching attack and continuously his speaking freely to western media
and boast about his operations
he walk around freely today and been released if he was arrested


Iranian regime will pay dearly for arming Pakistani citizens and providing safe heavens to raw .
 
.
Shalewar Kameez, chappels and motorbikes
Actually if u take a trip to that area at least on Iranian side is quite ruggy and harsh mountains.. I have heard soldiers been there complaining about regular army outfit.. This is why these days Iranian forces, at least Basiji Baluchs are also having a military outfit in form of Shalvar kamiz... although, I agree that they still can be better equipped...

13960115110922351104432710.jpg


794759.jpg


Also, at least in Iranian side the main force is made of local baluchs of IRGC or Border Police..so to counter a terrorist in shalvar kamiz maybe another shalvar kamiz is the answer...
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom