Russian strikes are precise ones for the most part - drone-corrected artillery strikes etc.
NATO propaganda may suggest otherwise but that's not saying much now, is it.
I see no large scale destruction of civilian amenities in those pictures. It's nothing much compared to how NATO obliterates towns and villages in its wars of aggression.
Not factoring in wide scale use of civilian infrastructure, private homes, even schools as shields by the Ukrainian army.
Even Amnesty International, which normally serves western imperial interests, could no longer cover up the truth and spoke out against this practice of the Ukrainian military:
https://www.businesslive.co.za/bloo...sty-report-that-its-army-endangers-civilians/
There's no stringent logical equivalence between these propositions. For instance, the longer the war lasts, the more Ukrainian troops are killed. The ratio is highly favorable to Russia. And, Ukrainian nationalists cannot be mass-produced by western defence industries.
Russia breathing its last breath... this says it all. One can't come up with such as assertion unless impacted by western narratives.
Most of Russia's artillery strikes are precision guided. I lost count of how many UAV-grabbed video sequences Russia published to this effect. So perhaps you haven't paid close enough attention to these documents.
I'm the only person to insist on this fact? Where exactly? Look at the thread dedicated to the war in Ukraine: most of those who endorse western narratives against Russia happen to be westerners themselves, and many of them joined the forum only to post in that thread (thus some may be trained online propagandists working for NATO regimes). Very few Pakistanis or other users hailing from the global south subscribe to these narratives.
Not to align on my views, you probably meant. I'm merely stating what I've been able to observe, and to gather from trustworthy analyses.