You did not address anything. Just made ur usual maybe woulda coulda based on absolutely NOTHING.
The comments are already posted in this thread, unlike you, I do not want to keep copy and pasting the same comments.
First of all we see that tumbling satellite is sign of total distress and anomaly.
False, this can occur initially and then stabilized.
Secondly satellite in your example was large satellite with gravity gradient stabilization with huge 100 m boom. It got some impulse in the beginning which caused it to tumble, but then as simple pendulum with large inertia it took days to stabilize. Funny that it was stabilized upside down in the end. So not good example anyway.
You have missed the point, which was the such a thing can occur and hence why using some initial tumbling as an indicator of the full satellite orbit in the future is silly. Gravity stabilisation is also used in cuebsat.
Noor on the other hand is just tiny cubesat it has virtually zero inertia and momentum. Absolutely nothing to do with ur example. If its not stabilized in first minutes then it wont be stabilized.
Nonsense. Perhaps in your own personally invented laws of physics such satellites have "virtually zero" inertia. Here is an entire paper dedicated to stabilising 3U satellites (Iranian one is 6U):
An Analysis of Stabilizing 3U CubeSats Using Gravity Gradient Techniques and a Low Power Reaction Wheel
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=aerosp
Other thing. Iran launched much larger than Noor satellite before. And none could provide any picture despite being at lower orbit.
That's because people are not children to rely on the "Picture or it's not true" methodology. Satellites nowadays can be tracked and their signals detected.
Satellites are much more complex technology than launcher itself
Nonsense.
.U cam borrow ancient Scud technology from North Korea, but where from u will get advanced satellite tech?
Listen to your own Israeli missile expert talk about how advanced this new Iranian SLV is:
This SLV has no relations to the "SCUDS", you're only highlighting that ether you're in need of doing some basic research into the topic, or it is just your attempts at trolling (and failing).
As for getting advanced satellite technology, Iran unlike Israel does not rely on the the charity of others.