Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions
- Thread starter The SiLent crY
- Start date
yavar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,988
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
China and Iran are currently the only countries that deploy ASBMs to target offshore assets.
U.S. and South Korea intelligence authorities suspect North Korea began to acquire ASBM technology from Iran in the '90s, according to the JoongAng.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...g-anti-ship-ballistic-missiles/3111489451179/
http://www.janes.com/article/68625/iran-successfully-tests-radar-guided-anti-ship-ballistic-missile
for Iranian memmbers only
this is good report with some intelligence source leak for fools who think north Korea missile program is head of Iran .
U.S. and South Korea intelligence authorities suspect North Korea began to acquire ASBM technology from Iran in the '90s, according to the JoongAng.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...g-anti-ship-ballistic-missiles/3111489451179/
http://www.janes.com/article/68625/iran-successfully-tests-radar-guided-anti-ship-ballistic-missile
for Iranian memmbers only
this is good report with some intelligence source leak for fools who think north Korea missile program is head of Iran .
Last edited:
yavar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,988
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
جروزالم پست: اسرائیل نگران لغو ممنوعیت‌های سازمان ملل علیه برنامه موشکی ایران است
پایگاه صهیونیستی جروزالم پست در گزارشی نوشت: در توافق هسته‌ای ایران یک مهلت ده ساله برای ممنوعیت فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای ایران، غنی‌سازی اورانیوم در این کشور و توسعه تجهیزات با قابلیت هسته‌ای قید شده است. مقامات اسرائیل معتقد هستند این مهلت 10 ساله ، که یک سال آن نیز سپری شده است، احتمالا در زندگی سیاسی طولانی به نظر برسد؛ اما در زندگی یک ملت چندان زمان طولانی نیست.
جروزالم پست در ادامه این گزارش نوشت: اسرائیل از هم‌اکنون در حال آماده شدن برای زمان انقضای توافق هسته‌ای ایران است. به ویژه آنکه دو مورد از محدودیت‌های تعیین شده برای ایران در زمینه فروش تسلیحات و توسعه برنامه ساخت موشک‌های بالستیک این کشور در چند سال آینده لغو خواهد شد.
"بنیامین نتانیاهو"، نخست وزیر رژیم صهیونیستی، در سفر ماه گذشته به واشنگتن اظهار داشت وی همراه با کابینه "دونالد ترامپ"، رئیس جمهور آمریکا، بر روی مواردی از توافق هسته‌ای ایران گفتگو و رایزنی کردند که دورنمای آنها بیش از سایرین چالش‌برانگیز بوده است. برای اسرائیل، ایران با اجرای این توافق بسیار خطرناک‌تر خواهد بود تا با لغو آن.
در ضمیمه "B” قطعنامه شماره 2231 شورای امنیت سازمان ملل قید شده است ایران اجازه انجام هیچ فعالیتی که به ساخت و طراحی موشک با قابلیت حمل سلاح هسته‌ای منتهی شود را نخواهد داشت. همچنین این کشور از استفاده فناوری‌های مرتبط با این نوع از موشک‌ها و خرید تجهیزات مربوط به توسعه موشک‌های بالستیک منع شده است. این ممنوعیت‌ها به موجب توافق هسته‌ای فقط 8 سال معتبر خواهند بود و اسرائیل به شدت نگران است پس از این مدت با یک کشور قدرتمند هسته‌ای که به لحاظ قانونی اجازه استفاده از موشک‌های بالستیک را دارد مواجه شود.
اسرائیل امیدوار است بتواند با جلب حمایت آمریکا و برخی متحدان اروپایی، سازمان ملل را برای افزایش زمان محدودیت‌های ایران تحت فشار بگذارد. اگر سازمان ملل حاضر به تمدید محدودیت‌های موشکی ایران شود، کشورهایی مانند روسیه و چین که تامین‌کنندگان اصلی تجهیزات موشکی ایران هستند، ساکت نخواهند نشست. یکی دیگر از اهداف اسرائیل متقاعد کردن سازمان ملل برای اعلام ممنوعیت آزمایش‌های موشکی ایران است.
درصورتیکه سازمان ملل بپذیرد مدت محدودیت‌های موشکی ایران را افزایش دهد، آمریکا آماده است برای کشورهای نقض‌کننده این فرمان (روسیه و چین) تحریم‌هایی در نظر بگیرد.
جروزالم پست در ادامه نوشت: مهلت قانونی ممنوعیت توسعه موشک‌های بالستیک ایران از سوی سازمان ملل تا سال 2023 به اتمام می‌رسد و در این مدت این کشور به قدر کافی از حمایت دوستان و متحدان خود برخوردار شده است تا کار توسعه موشکی تهران را بدون هیچ اتلاف وقتی از سر بگیرد.
باوجود اینکه توافق هسته‌ای ایران این کشور را از ساخت تسلیحات هسته‌ای باز می‌دارد؛ اسرائیل نگران است فعالیت‌های ایران در حوزه مواد شکافت‌پذیر به این کشور اجازه دهد تا برنامه ساخت یک منطقه صنعتی هسته‌ای را دنبال کند. ایران می‌تواند از این دانش و فناوری خود خیلی راحت و در کمترین زمان ممکن برای توسعه برنامه تسلیحاتی استفاده کند.
به موجب توافق هسته‌ای، ایران قادر خواهد بود در پایان 9 سال، تعداد سانتریفیوژهای خود را افزایش داده و به غنی‌سازی اورانیوم بپردازد. در آن زمان تجهیزات ایران به روزرسانی شده و رویارویی با چنین کشور هسته‌ای برای اسرائیل بسیار دشوار خواهد بود.
مقامات اسرائیلی معتقدند به موجب توافق هسته‌ای، ایران می‌تواند به یک کشور دارای فناوری هسته‌ای تبدیل شود بدون آنکه از نظر جامعه بین‌الملل کشوری ناقض قوانین به شمار آید. اسرائیل امیدوار است با لغو برخی محدودیت‌های زمانی تعیین شده در توافق هسته‌ای (و افزایش آنها) مانع از رسیدن ایران به این مرحله شده و خود را با دردسر رویارویی با یک ایران هسته‌ای مواجه نکند.
http://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/6022616/ج...یت‌های-سازمان-ملل-علیه-برنامه-موشکی-ایران-است
Israel already preparing for end of UN ban on Iran missile activity
WASHINGTON – Throughout international talks with Iran over its nuclear program, Israeli leadership offered a common refrain: Ten years may be a long time in the life of a politician, but it is nothing in the life of a nation.
In that spirit, Israel’s government is already planning for the expiration of several critical provisions in the deal that resulted from those talks, including two restrictions on Iran that sunset within the next few years on arms sales and its ballistic missile program.
Last month in Washington, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told The Jerusalem Post that he was working with the Trump administration on ways to mitigate the effects of some of the deal’s most challenging sunset clauses. For Israel, Iran is more dangerous if it abides by the deal than if it breaches it, he said.
Asked if he could offer specifics on his strategy, Netanyahu replied, “I could, but I won’t.” But those with his ear tell the Post that discussions have already begun, starting with a clause that lifts a UN ban on Iran’s ballistic missile work in just under seven years.
That ban, in Annex B of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, requires Iran “not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.” The provision also bans states from supplying, selling or transferring equipment, technology or training to Iran relevant to the advancement of that missile program.
The decision to include such a provision – which extended for eight years what would have otherwise expired upon completion of the nuclear deal– was opposed by Russia and China during the talks. Moscow has been a top supplier of Iran’s missile programs for several years.
Israel now believes that European nations, whose diplomats supported extending the ban during the nuclear negotiations, will be on board with a creative strategy that punishes Moscow through means outside of the UN should it choose to assist Iran with its continued missile work. The strategy would be to maintain de facto sanctions on Iran by threatening those that might supply it, despite the end of an explicit UN embargo against doing so.
The plan already appears popular in Washington.
“Sanctioning Russia is as popular as it has ever been on the Hill right now,” said one lobbyist with an Israel advocacy organization, discussing the emerging strategy. The lobbyist described the plan succinctly: Threatening new, tough sanctions on Moscow for its potential sale of ballistic missile components to Iran would kill two birds with one stone, targeting two of the world’s most destabilizing forces while gaining broad bipartisan support.
While this particular UN provision expires in 2023, Iran is expected to seek partners for collaboration well in advance. Thus Iran’s adversaries are likely to work backward against an unspecified date some time in the next few years.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is intended to prevent Iran from ever building nuclear weapons, but Israel worries that sunset clauses on its work with fissile material will allow Tehran to build an industrial-sized nuclear program, providing the state with a nuclear capacity that could easily be converted into a weapons program on short notice.
The deal allows Iran to expand the number of centrifuges it can use to enrich uranium, as well as the number of facilities it can use to host enrichment, in nine years. It also allows Iran to upgrade the centrifuges it has in use, from 1970s models to modern state-of-the-art machines. As the size and efficiency of their program advances – with full international legitimacy, under the nuclear deal – Israel fears it will be impossible to stop or even catch Iran should it choose to “break out” and build a weapon.
Furthermore, should Iran instead choose to park itself right before a bomb and remain a nuclear-threshold state, Israel believes that Iran will maintain all of the strategic benefits a nuclear power enjoys without facing the costs that rogue nuclear states endure. Israeli leaders seek to prevent Iran from reaching this threshold stage.
Speaking to the Post, several Israeli officials would only acknowledge that strategizing is under way to prevent these later sunset clauses from lapsing. No further details were provided.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Is...end-of-UN-ban-on-Iran-missile-activity-484634
پایگاه صهیونیستی جروزالم پست در گزارشی نوشت: در توافق هسته‌ای ایران یک مهلت ده ساله برای ممنوعیت فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای ایران، غنی‌سازی اورانیوم در این کشور و توسعه تجهیزات با قابلیت هسته‌ای قید شده است. مقامات اسرائیل معتقد هستند این مهلت 10 ساله ، که یک سال آن نیز سپری شده است، احتمالا در زندگی سیاسی طولانی به نظر برسد؛ اما در زندگی یک ملت چندان زمان طولانی نیست.
جروزالم پست در ادامه این گزارش نوشت: اسرائیل از هم‌اکنون در حال آماده شدن برای زمان انقضای توافق هسته‌ای ایران است. به ویژه آنکه دو مورد از محدودیت‌های تعیین شده برای ایران در زمینه فروش تسلیحات و توسعه برنامه ساخت موشک‌های بالستیک این کشور در چند سال آینده لغو خواهد شد.
"بنیامین نتانیاهو"، نخست وزیر رژیم صهیونیستی، در سفر ماه گذشته به واشنگتن اظهار داشت وی همراه با کابینه "دونالد ترامپ"، رئیس جمهور آمریکا، بر روی مواردی از توافق هسته‌ای ایران گفتگو و رایزنی کردند که دورنمای آنها بیش از سایرین چالش‌برانگیز بوده است. برای اسرائیل، ایران با اجرای این توافق بسیار خطرناک‌تر خواهد بود تا با لغو آن.
در ضمیمه "B” قطعنامه شماره 2231 شورای امنیت سازمان ملل قید شده است ایران اجازه انجام هیچ فعالیتی که به ساخت و طراحی موشک با قابلیت حمل سلاح هسته‌ای منتهی شود را نخواهد داشت. همچنین این کشور از استفاده فناوری‌های مرتبط با این نوع از موشک‌ها و خرید تجهیزات مربوط به توسعه موشک‌های بالستیک منع شده است. این ممنوعیت‌ها به موجب توافق هسته‌ای فقط 8 سال معتبر خواهند بود و اسرائیل به شدت نگران است پس از این مدت با یک کشور قدرتمند هسته‌ای که به لحاظ قانونی اجازه استفاده از موشک‌های بالستیک را دارد مواجه شود.
اسرائیل امیدوار است بتواند با جلب حمایت آمریکا و برخی متحدان اروپایی، سازمان ملل را برای افزایش زمان محدودیت‌های ایران تحت فشار بگذارد. اگر سازمان ملل حاضر به تمدید محدودیت‌های موشکی ایران شود، کشورهایی مانند روسیه و چین که تامین‌کنندگان اصلی تجهیزات موشکی ایران هستند، ساکت نخواهند نشست. یکی دیگر از اهداف اسرائیل متقاعد کردن سازمان ملل برای اعلام ممنوعیت آزمایش‌های موشکی ایران است.
درصورتیکه سازمان ملل بپذیرد مدت محدودیت‌های موشکی ایران را افزایش دهد، آمریکا آماده است برای کشورهای نقض‌کننده این فرمان (روسیه و چین) تحریم‌هایی در نظر بگیرد.
جروزالم پست در ادامه نوشت: مهلت قانونی ممنوعیت توسعه موشک‌های بالستیک ایران از سوی سازمان ملل تا سال 2023 به اتمام می‌رسد و در این مدت این کشور به قدر کافی از حمایت دوستان و متحدان خود برخوردار شده است تا کار توسعه موشکی تهران را بدون هیچ اتلاف وقتی از سر بگیرد.
باوجود اینکه توافق هسته‌ای ایران این کشور را از ساخت تسلیحات هسته‌ای باز می‌دارد؛ اسرائیل نگران است فعالیت‌های ایران در حوزه مواد شکافت‌پذیر به این کشور اجازه دهد تا برنامه ساخت یک منطقه صنعتی هسته‌ای را دنبال کند. ایران می‌تواند از این دانش و فناوری خود خیلی راحت و در کمترین زمان ممکن برای توسعه برنامه تسلیحاتی استفاده کند.
به موجب توافق هسته‌ای، ایران قادر خواهد بود در پایان 9 سال، تعداد سانتریفیوژهای خود را افزایش داده و به غنی‌سازی اورانیوم بپردازد. در آن زمان تجهیزات ایران به روزرسانی شده و رویارویی با چنین کشور هسته‌ای برای اسرائیل بسیار دشوار خواهد بود.
مقامات اسرائیلی معتقدند به موجب توافق هسته‌ای، ایران می‌تواند به یک کشور دارای فناوری هسته‌ای تبدیل شود بدون آنکه از نظر جامعه بین‌الملل کشوری ناقض قوانین به شمار آید. اسرائیل امیدوار است با لغو برخی محدودیت‌های زمانی تعیین شده در توافق هسته‌ای (و افزایش آنها) مانع از رسیدن ایران به این مرحله شده و خود را با دردسر رویارویی با یک ایران هسته‌ای مواجه نکند.
http://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/6022616/ج...یت‌های-سازمان-ملل-علیه-برنامه-موشکی-ایران-است
Israel already preparing for end of UN ban on Iran missile activity
WASHINGTON – Throughout international talks with Iran over its nuclear program, Israeli leadership offered a common refrain: Ten years may be a long time in the life of a politician, but it is nothing in the life of a nation.
In that spirit, Israel’s government is already planning for the expiration of several critical provisions in the deal that resulted from those talks, including two restrictions on Iran that sunset within the next few years on arms sales and its ballistic missile program.
Last month in Washington, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told The Jerusalem Post that he was working with the Trump administration on ways to mitigate the effects of some of the deal’s most challenging sunset clauses. For Israel, Iran is more dangerous if it abides by the deal than if it breaches it, he said.
Asked if he could offer specifics on his strategy, Netanyahu replied, “I could, but I won’t.” But those with his ear tell the Post that discussions have already begun, starting with a clause that lifts a UN ban on Iran’s ballistic missile work in just under seven years.
That ban, in Annex B of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, requires Iran “not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.” The provision also bans states from supplying, selling or transferring equipment, technology or training to Iran relevant to the advancement of that missile program.
The decision to include such a provision – which extended for eight years what would have otherwise expired upon completion of the nuclear deal– was opposed by Russia and China during the talks. Moscow has been a top supplier of Iran’s missile programs for several years.
Israel now believes that European nations, whose diplomats supported extending the ban during the nuclear negotiations, will be on board with a creative strategy that punishes Moscow through means outside of the UN should it choose to assist Iran with its continued missile work. The strategy would be to maintain de facto sanctions on Iran by threatening those that might supply it, despite the end of an explicit UN embargo against doing so.
The plan already appears popular in Washington.
“Sanctioning Russia is as popular as it has ever been on the Hill right now,” said one lobbyist with an Israel advocacy organization, discussing the emerging strategy. The lobbyist described the plan succinctly: Threatening new, tough sanctions on Moscow for its potential sale of ballistic missile components to Iran would kill two birds with one stone, targeting two of the world’s most destabilizing forces while gaining broad bipartisan support.
While this particular UN provision expires in 2023, Iran is expected to seek partners for collaboration well in advance. Thus Iran’s adversaries are likely to work backward against an unspecified date some time in the next few years.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is intended to prevent Iran from ever building nuclear weapons, but Israel worries that sunset clauses on its work with fissile material will allow Tehran to build an industrial-sized nuclear program, providing the state with a nuclear capacity that could easily be converted into a weapons program on short notice.
The deal allows Iran to expand the number of centrifuges it can use to enrich uranium, as well as the number of facilities it can use to host enrichment, in nine years. It also allows Iran to upgrade the centrifuges it has in use, from 1970s models to modern state-of-the-art machines. As the size and efficiency of their program advances – with full international legitimacy, under the nuclear deal – Israel fears it will be impossible to stop or even catch Iran should it choose to “break out” and build a weapon.
Furthermore, should Iran instead choose to park itself right before a bomb and remain a nuclear-threshold state, Israel believes that Iran will maintain all of the strategic benefits a nuclear power enjoys without facing the costs that rogue nuclear states endure. Israeli leaders seek to prevent Iran from reaching this threshold stage.
Speaking to the Post, several Israeli officials would only acknowledge that strategizing is under way to prevent these later sunset clauses from lapsing. No further details were provided.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Is...end-of-UN-ban-on-Iran-missile-activity-484634
Kastor
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2017
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Very interesting news piece....bravo Iran. Sorry I can't post links, I just joined. Also I could not find the original news post from the Kuwaiti Daily...so Jpost will have to do.
REPORT: IRAN ACCUSES RUSSIA OF GIVING ISRAEL CODES FOR SYRIAN AIR DEFENSES
BYYASSER OKBI/ MAARIV HASHAVUA
MARCH 21, 2017 15:53
Kuwaiti daily quotes Iran Defense Ministry source as saying Iran was able to change the codes without Russia's knowledge, enabling Friday's missile launch against Israeli aircraft.
REPORT: IRAN ACCUSES RUSSIA OF GIVING ISRAEL CODES FOR SYRIAN AIR DEFENSES
BYYASSER OKBI/ MAARIV HASHAVUA
MARCH 21, 2017 15:53
Kuwaiti daily quotes Iran Defense Ministry source as saying Iran was able to change the codes without Russia's knowledge, enabling Friday's missile launch against Israeli aircraft.
Kastor
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2017
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Incredible...such an underhanded thing. This why there is so much smack talk about the Russkies. No wonder we're developing our own systems. I hope the engineers back home have already reprogrammed every single S-300 that these Judases have sold us.
AmirPatriot
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 4,156
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
"Iran defence ministry source" who isn't named.
Navigator
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2010
- Messages
- 237
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
BTW most modern Syrian Air Defence radars, that were purchased before war, even not Russian, but Chinese.
Syria in the 2008-10 bought radars of three types for early detection, all Chinese - JY-27, JYL-1 and Type 120.
Given this fact, any fabrications about the Russian codes look ridiculous.
Syria in the 2008-10 bought radars of three types for early detection, all Chinese - JY-27, JYL-1 and Type 120.
Given this fact, any fabrications about the Russian codes look ridiculous.
Kastor
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2017
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Whenever there is let's say "Fake News" you have to ask what's the angle? What's to gain from it? This is first reported by a Kuwaiti paper, it arguably makes Iran look capable and clever, why would they want to push that news? I can understand if it undermined Iran in some way but there is nothing to indicate that. Also as few of you already mentioned this kind of things have been done before, which again chips away at the fake news narrative.
Arminkh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,036
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
True or not, I wonder why Iran doesn't send a squadron of its home built AA batteries like Tabas or Raad to Syria? After all, Iran is relying on these systems to work in a real war scenario and yet, we have not tested them in any real situation against an actual enemy fighter.
There are a lot of valuable lessons that can be learned about any potential weaknesses of the system.
There are a lot of valuable lessons that can be learned about any potential weaknesses of the system.
VEVAK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 2,406
- Reaction score
- 1
Because you would be providing your enemy with information they shouldn't have! Like the actual range of the radar, speed of operation,.....
yadet bosheh keh dar har khairi sharri nahofteh!
The Russian's have their SAM systems there no need for us to do the same!
Arminkh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,036
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
Well I can only imagine two outcomes:
1- We deploy them and they are successful where it seems S300 has failed. That will send a strong message to everyone around the world especially US and Israel that they should really reconsider their "options on the table". It is a great outcome even if it give away information about our system. Remember Iran will keep its trump card, Bavar 373 to itself.
2- We deploy them and they fail to do what they are supposed to do. Again a great outcome for Iran as they know they need to improve their system and should not rely on them.
As it is today, we are relying on systems that we really don't know how effective they are. For all we know, Syria's S300 has not done anything spectacular so far. Now it may be because IDF somehow got their hands on the codes but that remains to be seen. This is not an ideal situation for Iran.
Similar threads
