What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

.
well , you get it somehow wrong , those are precision rockets so they are more expensive than 100$
but its not what i say . I compared tamir interceptor price with something like pantsir and Tor and believe me its a lot cheaper than those two
Well,not all missiles fired by Palestinians are those high precision,90% missiles in barages are unguided artilery rockets or in short MLRS,than they use few of these precise to strike targets. Pantsir,TOR..are not same class as Iron Dome,actualy Iron Dome is completly different system, designed for different targets. Iron Dome is much more expensive and interceptors are expensive like hell....Unlike Pantsir or Tor,Iron Dome is designed to intercept artilery shels and rockets,while Tor and Pantsir are something different,designed to engage aircrafts,cruise missiles and air lunched weapons...So,Iron Dome is not comparable in any terms..with Thor or Pantsir..Iron Dome is unique,designed to engage targets you will never see Pantsir or Tor to engage....like MLRS and shels fired from mortars and howitzers. MLRS,Shels....these are non maneuverable targets with fixed balistic trajectory lunched from ground,while Tor,Pantsir..etc is designed to engage hihgly manueverable aerial targets.If you check Iron Dome set up and Pantsir or Tor,you will see these systems are completly different,in fact Iron Dome is unique set up,and what make it so expencive is fact that it engages targets that in 90% cases cost less than 100$. But I suppose,for Israel money is second issue,so they feel like they can afford it as long it stops certain % of rockets.
 
. .
Well,not all missiles fired by Palestinians are those high precision,90% missiles in barages are unguided artilery rockets or in short MLRS,than they use few of these precise to strike targets. Pantsir,TOR..are not same class as Iron Dome,actualy Iron Dome is completly different system, designed for different targets. Iron Dome is much more expensive and interceptors are expensive like hell....Unlike Pantsir or Tor,Iron Dome is designed to intercept artilery shels and rockets,while Tor and Pantsir are something different,designed to engage aircrafts,cruise missiles and air lunched weapons...So,Iron Dome is not comparable in any terms..with Thor or Pantsir..Iron Dome is unique,designed to engage targets you will never see Pantsir or Tor to engage....like MLRS and shels fired from mortars and howitzers. MLRS,Shels....these are non maneuverable targets with fixed balistic trajectory lunched from ground,while Tor,Pantsir..etc is designed to engage hihgly manueverable aerial targets.If you check Iron Dome set up and Pantsir or Tor,you will see these systems are completly different,in fact Iron Dome is unique set up,and what make it so expencive is fact that it engages targets that in 90% cases cost less than 100$. But I suppose,for Israel money is second issue,so they feel like they can afford it as long it stops certain % of rockets.

The alternative is a destroyed city don't you think its worth spending tens of millions to prevent that? Even if its unguided, its just going all over the place hitting anywhere it goes.
 
.
If the Palestinians could, than they would surely prefer to purchase guided munitions so that they could strike at the zionist apartheid forces directly. However the truth is that they cannot purchase such weapons. They have no access or the funds. So they have no choice but to launch unguided munitions

In any case, the Israeli's have some of the most precise missiles on earth, the Palestinians have unguided rockets. Despite this, the Israeli's have killed dozens of Palestinian civilians with 140+ Palestinians dead , whereas Hamas has only managed to kill 10 Israeli civilians ?

SO who are the victims here ? Who are the terrorists from an undemocratic, apartheid state, who lynch their own Arab citizens under the protection of the police forces ?


The alternative is a destroyed city don't you think its worth spending tens of millions to prevent that? Even if its unguided, its just going all over the place hitting anywhere it goes.
 
. . .
Unstable flight trajectory. Wink wink iron dome...
hmmm. how much destruction can 400kgs of tnt do?

so i don't know if this is accurate or not. but i think Israeli's should evacuate evething around gaza in a few kms radius.
1621165049426.png
 
.
The alternative is a destroyed city don't you think its worth spending tens of millions to prevent that? Even if its unguided, its just going all over the place hitting anywhere it goes.
I dont question their logic,but it is probably not durable in real war scenario against strong oponent,since iron dome is very narrow in its functionality,with many already known flaws and still very expencive ..but yes,it has sense to use it against hamas...that is why I said it is unique in every way and related to Israel position. And,no alternative is not destroyed city,I mean..yes casulties would be much higher but not destroyed,I was in city with of half milion population,for 4 years more than 1000 shels,MLRS,bombs hit it every day and still was not even close to destroyed...tin 90% cases Hamas fire rockets with small wareads. But it would paralize Isreal totaly,so yes,for them it makes sense to spent on Iron Dome. Discusion was about price comparation between iron Dome and Tor,Pantsir...
 
Last edited:
. . . .
I wonder what will be the latest development to be announced in this domain.
Their are so many routes to go down.

Longer ranges in Raad series?
Continuation of Haj Qassem missile?
Revealing the largest ever solid fuel engine tested recently? (Possibly 2m diameters)
Sejjil-3 with Salman 3rd stage?
Perhaps a liquid fuel development.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom