What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

Is this true?

PicsArt_05-23-09.02.05-picsay.jpg
 
. . .

Not in the slightest!

Angi-2 is a 2 or 2.5 stage missile vs Iran's Emad Missile that's a 1 or 1.5 stage missile

Aside from that the dimensions of both the missile and the reentry vehicle are totally different making it's flight control system totally different... In layman's terms it's like putting the flight control software of an F-22 on an F-5! It really makes no difference how advanced the flight control software of an F-22 is because once you put it on an F-5 regardless of how advance it is it still becomes absolutely useless!

And If it was as easy as that Iran's Fatteh-110 built almost 15 years ago also has fins and high precision but that doesn't mean you can just slap it on any Ballistic Missile and....

upload_2016-5-29_17-45-8.png


as raptor 22 said It's like saying an Iranian car has 4 wheels, same as and Indian cars.....
 
.

Your obsession with Iran-India relations has given you much brain farts I see. :lol: At lest get the name of missile right.

Not in the slightest!

Angi-2 is a 2 or 2.5 stage missile vs Iran's Emad Missile that's a 1 or 1.5 stage missile

What are you talking about? It is based on the ghadir family which are a two staged missile.
 
.
Your obsession with Iran-India relations has given you much brain farts I see. :lol: At lest get the name of missile right.



What are you talking about? It is based on the ghadir family which are a two staged missile.

Nope! And why are you upset? 1 stage is better!!!!

Emad is a 1 or 1.5 stage missile with a range of 1750 km not a 2 stage!

Less stages less problems!

1 stage = increased survivability
1 stage = far less chance of technical problems
1 stage = faster set up time and fueling
1 stage = easer use and less technical requirements
1 stage = cheaper and easier to mass produce
and so much more!

And the fact that Iran has a 1 stage missile that size that can fly 1750 km and hit targets with high accuracy is a big deal! a 2 stage would have been far less impressive!
 
.
In SLBM I would say N.Korea is more advance

may i ask how did you figure this one out ??

ایران پیشرفته‌تر از آن چیزی است که نشان می‌دهد/ بوش تعلل کرد
GvL0GOU.jpg

در حال حاضر همان‌قدر که رئیس‌جمهور از پیشرفت‌ها و فعالیت‌های کره شمالی نگران است، به همان میزان و شاید بیشتر نیز باید در مورد ایران نگرانی داشته باشد. به اعتقاد من، کره شمالی در بسیاری از موارد فقط شوی سیاسی اجرا می‌کند، در حالی‌که ایران بسیار پیشرفته‌تر از آن چیزی است که نشان می‌دهد و همین باید همه ما را در سیستم سیاسی آمریکا هم نگران کند و هم به فکر فرو ببرد. باید به دنبال راه چاره بود


http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13950207001203
 
. .
may i ask how did you figure this one out ??

ایران پیشرفته‌تر از آن چیزی است که نشان می‌دهد/ بوش تعلل کرد
GvL0GOU.jpg

در حال حاضر همان‌قدر که رئیس‌جمهور از پیشرفت‌ها و فعالیت‌های کره شمالی نگران است، به همان میزان و شاید بیشتر نیز باید در مورد ایران نگرانی داشته باشد. به اعتقاد من، کره شمالی در بسیاری از موارد فقط شوی سیاسی اجرا می‌کند، در حالی‌که ایران بسیار پیشرفته‌تر از آن چیزی است که نشان می‌دهد و همین باید همه ما را در سیستم سیاسی آمریکا هم نگران کند و هم به فکر فرو ببرد. باید به دنبال راه چاره بود


http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13950207001203


N. Korea has a lot more submarines than Iran does
N. Korea is actively building +1000 tone submarines
N. Korea has tested a SLBM & Iran has not


So yes they are more advanced than Iran when it come to SLBM's
 
.
N. Korea has a lot more submarines than Iran does
N. Korea is actively building +1000 tone submarines
N. Korea has tested a SLBM & Iran has not


So yes they are more advanced than Iran when it come to SLBM's

What is the point of SLBM when we have no bombs !?
 
.
What is the point of SLBM when we have no bombs !?

You mean Nukes?

My point is that the only reason N.Korea is more advanced than Iran in SLBM is because they have been working towards developing that capability & Iran has not! Because Iran doesn't need them!

In my opinion a precision guided weapon to me is more valuable because it may actually get used!
 
.
Iran to Unveil New Missile Systems: Commander



TEHRAN (Tasnim) – Commander of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia Air Defense Base Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili highlighted the country’s latest achievements in the area of air defense, saying that a series of new missile systems will become operational in a few months.

A series of new domestically-built missile systems will come on stream by the end of the current Iranian calendar year (March 2016-March 2017), Brigadier General Esmaili said in a speech on Wednesday.

The new missile systems will be “fatal” to any enemy who dares to Threaten Iran, he added.

Brigadier General Esmaili further described Iran’s airspace as the safest in the Middle East thanks to its advanced, homegrown radars and defense missile systems.

Iranian military experts and technicians have in recent years made great headways in manufacturing a broad range of indigenous equipment, making the armed forces self-sufficient in the arms sphere.

Iran has made it clear that its military might poses no threat to the regional countries, saying that the Islamic Republic’s defense doctrine is entirely based on deterrence.

http://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2016/06/30/1118648/iran-to-unveil-new-missile-systems-commander
 
. .
What does it mean? it meant "fatal" in English? never heard naming Iranian manufactured weapons and systems by English words ....
It is an adjective and means 'deadly'.
N. Korea has a lot more submarines than Iran does
N. Korea is actively building +1000 tone submarines
N. Korea has tested a SLBM & Iran has not


So yes they are more advanced than Iran when it come to SLBM's
Toam ke faghat zede Iran migi. Baba kheyli nokhbe hasti.

Zoj Irani ha hich ghomi tu jahan vojud nadaran ke bar zede keshvare khodeshun sohbat konan.
 
.
It is an adjective and means 'deadly'.

Toam ke faghat zede Iran migi. Baba kheyli nokhbe hasti
I mentioned in my post that it might be "fatal" in English and it does mean deadly as you said , but what I asked is since when we name and call our manufactured weapons with English words? that's why I doubt ...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom