NADIM.NAZI
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
I know what it is what I wanna know is probably it would be wired to each TEL in time of firing a missile? or one for several of them? I mean isn't a system to control a number of TEL without need of such a thing?Its the launch control of the TEL.
The crew always leaves the TEL to safe distance since there is always the risk of malfunction or attack.
I know what it is what I wanna know is probably it would be wired to each TEL in time of firing a missile? or one for several of them? I mean isn't a system to control a number of TEL without need of such a thing?
You could certainly do that,after all if you can transmit firing orders to a tel crew in the field then you could definitely go one step further and transmit the firing order directly to the tels onboard fire control system.......however,and there are some BIG "howevers",the problem then becomes one of having both a secure and reliable transmission system that is both capable of reliably covering ALL of iran geographically as well as being robust enough to survive both physical attacks plus ew attacks from enemies.In addition depending on the degree of the complexity of the system this might require the tel crew to put the missile in a firable state and this would require them to have to signal this back to the central command post prior to any remote firing,so you would now require VERY reliable 2way communications links.Another way would be to remotely enable and operate the entire firing system on the tel with the crew just being required to oversee the process to make sure that there werent any problems with the launch preparation sequence.I know what it is what I wanna know is probably it would be wired to each TEL in time of firing a missile? or one for several of them? I mean isn't a system to control a number of TEL without need of such a thing?
You are lighting a ballistic missile carrying a massive warhead, not a firecracker.
How can one system SAFELY signal ignition in multiple engines? Use common sense.
Well it'd be useful in case of firing 400 missiles as Hajizade said against American respond to Ain Alassad missile strike.You could certainly do that,after all if you can transmit firing orders to a tel crew in the field then you could definitely go one step further and transmit the firing order directly to the tels onboard fire control system.......however,and there are some BIG "howevers",the problem then becomes one of having both a secure and reliable transmission system that is both capable of reliably covering ALL of iran geographically as well as being robust enough to survive both physical attacks plus ew attacks from enemies.In addition depending on the degree of the complexity of the system this might require the tel crew to put the missile in a firable state and this would require them to have to signal this back to the central command post prior to any remote firing,so you would now require VERY reliable 2way communications links.Another way would be to remotely enable and operate the entire firing system on the tel with the crew just being required to oversee the process to make sure that there werent any problems with the launch preparation sequence.
To make something like this fully workable you`d really need a constellation of com sats.But its all within irans technological capabilities.
This is in fact exactly the very sort of command and control system that you would expect iran to develop if,or indeed when,it becomes a nuclear armed state.Well it'd be useful in case of firing 400 missiles as Hajizade said against American respond to Ain Alassad missile strike.
I just think of a more agile system ..
I don't know about the railgun's range. I mean if thats true and considering it doesn't have the long range barrel like you see in the past. You can't really say its impossible unless you figure out. Considering they were able to fire an object into space 100 miles high, but not in range. Who knows, probably send the object into space, less resistance besides gravity.it’s impossible to fire any shell “1000s of miles”. I mean this is basic physics.
Even Navy’s magical railgun was only 100-200 mile range.
Considering the technology where you have laser guidance, INS, infrared, imaging, radar, besides GPS jamming resistance, etc. Don't doubt it.Yes, but these are mostly GPS/satellite guided systems. Satellite guidance is not something you can rely on in a major conflict in my opinion. We're discussing internal navigation system that could withstand the extreme g forces.
Qiam-2 tactical, No each TEL has operating launch system with operatorAnyone knows anything about this? every single missile has one of this? or it launch all if them?
View attachment 634699 View attachment 634701
Heres a rather interesting pic that I found.
It shows the differences in size between the khorramshahr,the musudan and the original ss-n-6/r-27 zyb missiles
However, as we saw with Ashura/Sejill/Sejill II, sometimes difficulty in mass production forces a smaller amount being built even though a newer “generation” appears shortly after the first.
.