What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

. . .
The letter is fake. It surfaced right after the attack.

404 error
why is fake bic surfaced after attack did u want before attack show that???maybe the video sepah recorded of attack come out i think in that condition u say its fake .in near future g.hajizade show that and we can see who many go to hell let alone brain damage
 
.
.
With regards to the letter claim. No need to be insistent that Americans died in the attack. It's not like Iran was trying to kill them.
 
. . .
what do u mean?

I have seen people trying to insist the Americans are trying to cover up the fact soldier died in the attack. Maybe they did, I don't know. What I am saying is it does not really matter because it is not like Iran was trying to kill them. If Iran wanted them dead, it would not have given any warning.
 
.
I have seen people trying to insist the Americans are trying to cover up the fact soldier died in the attack. Maybe they did, I don't know. What I am saying is it does not really matter because it is not like Iran was trying to kill them. If Iran wanted them dead, it would not have given any warning.

Those who keep focusing on the supposed troop death cover up can't see the forest for the trees (well not all of them). As PeeD said quite some time ago when the operation went down: this Iranian strike was a battle-field weapons test of Iranian made BMs/Qausi-BMs to show the world, especially Israel, Saudi Arabia and the U.S.A that Iran means business and can back-up the rhetoric with actual real world results.

All the little details I personally no longer care about, now we have to wait and see what else Iran is working on and how open they will be in showing it off to us in the future, thankfully Iran has given us a lot test-footage and real-world data to ponder on. so for that I am thankful.
 
.
why is fake bic surfaced after attack did u want before attack show that???maybe the video sepah recorded of attack come out i think in that condition u say its fake .in near future g.hajizade show that and we can see who many go to hell let alone brain damage
I just said the letter is old from the days that attack happened. Beck in the time it was declared as fake by Pentagon and the senator whom the letter is ent to als said he never received such letter. If IRGC has any video it's time they showed it.
 
.
So we know the Americans are developing a 1000 mile ranged "super-cannon".

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1582596030932-slrc-poster.jpg


https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ile-range-supergun-concept-heres-what-we-know


Such a thing is a must for Iran. Imagine 100's of these (both mobile version and static versions) throughout Iran. This technology will be a great complementary weapon to Iran's current missile strategy.
 
.
So we know the Americans are developing a 1000 mile ranged "super-cannon".

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1582596030932-slrc-poster.jpg


https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ile-range-supergun-concept-heres-what-we-know


Such a thing is a must for Iran. Imagine 100's of these (both mobile version and static versions) throughout Iran. This technology will be a great complementary weapon to Iran's current missile strategy.


The idea has been around since Jules Verne and Nazi Germany.

Even Saddam had unsuccessful tried. Their propaganda was we want to hit Tehran with cannon.

Yet again I am open to try new ideas.
 
Last edited:
.
So we know the Americans are developing a 1000 mile ranged "super-cannon".

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1582596030932-slrc-poster.jpg


https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ile-range-supergun-concept-heres-what-we-know


Such a thing is a must for Iran. Imagine 100's of these (both mobile version and static versions) throughout Iran. This technology will be a great complementary weapon to Iran's current missile strategy.

I'm down for Iran building super-long range cannons if they could do it cost effectively.

But is such a weapons platform a must, given all the advancements Iran has made with missile-tech?
 
.
The idea has been around since Jules Verne and Nazi Germany.

Even Saddam had unsuccessful tried. Their propaganda was we want to hit Tehran with cannon.

Yet again I am open to try new ideas.

Technologies manifest at later dates then we they were first theorised. Even these hypersonic glide systems were known about going back to the 1940's, but only now we're seeing those technologies mature. This cannon is another but albeit smaller example.

But is such a weapons platform a must, given all the advancements Iran has made with missile-tech?

Once you have built the cannons, then you are comparing costs of the shells vs cost of missiles. Not only that, Iran will be able to mass produce the shells much faster and cheaper than missiles. Within the 1000 miles or so radius, these systems will be very complementary to Iran's missile. One could even see these systems become the initial go to weapons to attack targets (air defence, light assets etc) followed by or alongside a barrage of missiles.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom