What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

I doubt the israelis said this

No man I was exaggerating! What they said was more alone the line of "To properly strike just a handful of Iranian Nuclear sites they would need to use 50% of their fleet with expected losses of 25-30%"

So I exaggerated that into taking out Iran's nuclear facilities would cost them 50% of their Air Force.
 
.
Go look at how much LBS/KGS of bombs the Syrian airforce dropped during the civil war. Or for that matter the RAF during end of the war. Or for that matter the US airforce. Look at Iraq war or 60 day Lebanon war.

I am shocked you think 3000 x 250 or 500 is enough armament to fight a war. The US will easily drop that much in the first DAYS of the Iran war on Iranian military targets.

The reliance on BMs to deliver Iran’s outside the border response is not realistic especially considering the amount of targets Iran will have to hit (Israel, SA, Bahrain, Kuwait, UAE, Afghanistan, Etc.)

This. So much this. BMs alone are not enough, capability or cost-wise.
 
. .

The article is filled with lies!
1st The test was NOT a breach of any UN resolution. 2ndly, Iran never denied the testing of the missile. Finally, Iran has made NO confirmation on conducting any kind of test that's in any way a violation of any UN resolutions.

While the article makes it sound like Iran secretly tested a Missile that was in violation of UN resolutions, got caught due to the might USA and is now confirming the test which is utter nonsense. And this fictional news is their version of a free media where their so called free media outlets are more concerned about spreading CIA sponsored propaganda rather than reporting factual unbiased news.

And this is the type of Free Media and Freedom of speech these people hope to bring to Iran as they have done so in the UAE (where that article is from)!

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...deh-missile-test-US-Secretary-of-State-Pompeo

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/12/11/582643/missile-Iran-Zarif-Resolution-2231
 
.
The article is filled with lies!
1st The test was NOT a breach of any UN resolution. 2ndly, Iran never denied the testing of the missile. Finally, Iran has made NO confirmation on conducting any kind of test that's in any way a violation of any UN resolutions.

While the article makes it sound like Iran secretly tested a Missile that was in violation of UN resolutions, got caught due to the might USA and is now confirming the test which is utter nonsense. And this fictional news is their version of a free media where their so called free media outlets are more concerned about spreading CIA sponsored propaganda rather than reporting factual unbiased news.

And this is the type of Free Media and Freedom of speech these people hope to bring to Iran as they have done so in the UAE (where that article is from)!

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...deh-missile-test-US-Secretary-of-State-Pompeo

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/12/11/582643/missile-Iran-Zarif-Resolution-2231
I totally agree with you. When I read the article, I was very angry with the lies in this article, but I post it because Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh confirmed that they had tested a missile.

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...deh-missile-test-US-Secretary-of-State-Pompeo

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/iran-confirms-recent-missile-test-amid-western-criticism-1961024

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-missile-test-in-defiance-of-us-idUSKBN1OA0U7
 
.
I totally agree with you. When I read the article, I was very angry with the lies in this article, but I post it because Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh confirmed that they had tested a missile.

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...deh-missile-test-US-Secretary-of-State-Pompeo

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/iran-confirms-recent-missile-test-amid-western-criticism-1961024

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-missile-test-in-defiance-of-us-idUSKBN1OA0U7

Yea man I know your views on the subject and I know for a fact that you don't have any bad intentions.... Maybe it's just me but I just simply don't wanna increase the click counts of websites like that.... It's all good!
 
.
Yea man I know your views on the subject and I know for a fact that you don't have any bad intentions.... Maybe it's just me but I just simply don't wanna increase the click counts of websites like that.... It's all good!
thanks man. i'm grateful. i will try to find and publish sites with some good view on Iran or better content with out lies at least.
 
.
Six factors shaping Iran’s missile decision-making calculus

https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/or...curity-council-2231-wmd-free-zone-pompeo.html

FireShot.png
 
. . . .
.
anyone know range of fateh mobin? i think they didn't announce the range, but fateh 110 is 300km and fateh 313 is 500km, so is fateh mobin likely to be 300 or 500km range?
 
.
anyone know range of fateh mobin? i think they didn't announce the range, but fateh 110 is 300km and fateh 313 is 500km, so is fateh mobin likely to be 300 or 500km range?

Fateh Mobin is basically a warhead upgrade, it can be fitted to any of the Fateh series from Fateh-110 up to the Zolfaqar.
 
.
Fateh Mobin is basically a warhead upgrade, it can be fitted to any of the Fateh series from Fateh-110 up to the Zolfaqar.
sepas.

although didn't they market fateh mobin as specifically anti-ship?

also, why haven't we seen much of the fateh 313? does it have same CEP as latest fateh 110?

to me it seems that would be a huge development to have a missile as accurate as the mobin with the range of the 313 (500km vs 300km for the fateh 110), so surely the next step would be to mass produce the fateh mobin warhead on the fateh 313...?

(they talk about zolfaqar being adapted for anti-ship, but i don't think zolfaqar has a good record for anti-land and latest fateh generations show more promise in my opinion.)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom