What's new

Iranian-made unmanned drone involved in attack on Turkish soldiers in Syria

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ir...yria.aspx?pageID=238&nID=106965&NewsCatID=352

An Iranian-made unmanned drone was used in an attack on a Turkish military camp in northern Syria on Nov. 24, killing four soldiers, a senior Turkish official has told the Hürriyet Daily News.

Turkey identified the drone as Iranian-made, but it was still not identified whether Hezbollah, the Quds Force or another Shiite militia group in Syria had used it, said the official, who spoke on anonymity.

FM Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, accompanied by National Intelligence Agency (MİT) Chief Hakan Fidan, paid a surprise visit to Tehran early on Nov. 26, where the Turkish delegation discussed “issues regarding ISIL and counter-terrorism” with Iran and also raised the issue that their findings on the attack on Turkish soldiers in Syria indicated that an Iranian-made unmanned drone was used, the official also said.

However, Çavuşoğlu denied that they discussed the aerial attack in the meeting in Tehran. “Our visit to Tehran had nothing to do with the plane. We went there for a fourth round of discussions that aimed to find ways to precede peace in Syria. We discussed how a cease-fire could be reached, to send humanitarian aid and the necessary steps needed to be taken if there is a cease-fire. But it was not about the drone,” daily Habertürk quoted Çavuşoğlu as saying on Dec. 6.

Syrian Army does not possess drones: Russia


In a phone call between President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Nov. 26, the second conversation between the two leaders in 26 hours, Russian sources told the Hürriyet Daily News that “both parties have reached a consensus that the attack was carried out by an unmanned drone.”

Moscow informed Ankara that the drone did not belong to them, and the Syrian Army did not possess such an aircraft. The U.S.-led coalition forces also informed Moscow that the drone did not belong to them either, sources added.

“It’s not clear whom the drone belongs to,” the source said, adding that both presidents agreed that their military officials would work to the reveal the origins of the aircraft.

Çavuşoğlu told a Lebanese media outlet on Dec. 3 that Russia did not “directly reject” that the regime forces might be responsible for the attack, “but they said the Syrian regime’s aircraft do not have the firepower, and did not possess unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones.”

“There are various opinions on this issue and there is a kind of blame game going on. Russia is clearly affirming that they did not do it. But, there are many other elements in the region. After thorough investigations, we will be able to say who the perpetrator was, so now is not a good time to accuse any country,” he stated.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Dec. 1 that neither Syria nor Russia carried out the attack on the Turkish soldiers in northern Syria on Nov. 24.

“In the air strike, assessed to have been carried out by the Syrian regime forces, three of our heroic soldiers were killed and 10 soldiers were wounded, one severely,” the Turkish Armed Forces said in a written statement on Nov. 24 on the attack that occurred near the northern Syrian city of al-Bab.

In an interview with the state-run TRT on late Dec. 1, government spokesperson Numan Kurtulmuş addressed the possibility of an involvement of an unmanned drone in the attack.

“There are records of aircraft flying there at that time… It seems that some groups uncomfortable with the operation [Euphrates Shield], are involved in this incident. It’s known that terrorist groups also have unmanned drones in the air. It will eventually be revealed,” Kurtulmuş said in a press conference on Nov. 28, adding that they had “recordings of aircraft, planes or unmanned drones” in the region.

On Aug. 24, the Turkish Armed Forces launched the Euphrates Shield operation in Syria with Free Syrian Army (FSA) fighters to clear the country’s southern border of both the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) forces, which Ankara considers as a terrorist organization linked to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

Ankara-backed FSA fighters have moved within two kilometers of al-Bab with the aim of taking the city from ISIL. The strategic city of al-Bab, meaning “the gate” in Arabic, in the northern Aleppo province, is one of ISIL’s few remaining strongholds and is a route to ISIL-held Raqqa and Syrian rebel-held Idlib.

Regime forces, while continuing their offensive to capture the eastern part of Aleppo from the Syrian opposition groups, is currently advancing toward al-Bab as well.
 
.
Iran or Hizbullah is not even active in that area as far as I know.
 
.
Iran or Hizbullah is not even active in that area as far as I know.
However, that doesn't mean that Assad or one of Iran's proxy could not have used the drone for this occassion. Perhaps another reason they dared to do such an attack is due to the difficulty of finding out who exactly was behind it. Of course Iran or Assad could also simply order a proxy to carry out the strike, so to make itself publically look 'clean'.
 
.
However, that doesn't mean that Assad or one of Iran's proxy could not have used the drone for this occassion. Perhaps another reason they dared to do such an attack is due to the difficulty of finding out who exactly was behind it. Of course Iran or Assad could also simply order a proxy to carry out the strike, so to make itself publically look 'clean'.

I'm afraid there will be more attacks like that. The despicable assad regime is in a revenge mode after the fall of Aleppo. There's not much Turkey can do right now as Turkey is busy improving relation with Russia. It's a very dangerous period for the Turkish forces in Syria.
 
.
As far as i know only PKK sources claim airstrike on Turkish forces, and Hürriyet took that from them. No other source claim that.

But media claims that our fighters bombed Al-Bab, and IS car bomb killed 1 Turkish soldier, wounded 6.
 
.
Iran or Hizbullah is not even active in that area as far as I know.

Thats true. Hezbullah is primarely active in Aleppo and around the Syrian/Lebanese border region. Iranians forces are scathered and they only involve sporadic around Syria. This is either false news or the Syrian regime purchased some new toys from our Iranian neighbours.
 
.
All this situation sounds like a bad internet chat,

Turkey : WTF? THAT CAME FROM A RUSSIAN CONTROLLED BASE!!!! ASSAD and his REGIME will pay for this
Russia : It wasn't us, it could be the Syrian Airforce (Putin Guarantee's that it wasn't Russia)
Turkey : We entered Syria to put an end to Assad.
Syria : #$%@^%$&^%$^&! with Erdogan, his 'rejime' will die in .....
Russia : WTF? (Lavrov) Nope it isn't us and it isn't the Syrian Airforce
Turkey : hmmmm .... Could it be a drone?
Russia : it might be an Iranian made UAV

---- what is next?

I wouldn't be suprised if the next thing that comes up is :

US / EU : (Secretly laughing...ha ha ha )... told you they'd bite on the Iranian drone thing, good thing we kept that Iranian paint thingy...


Turkish soldiers have been killed by an X enemy, on a battlefield.. look no one is owning up?
Earn some bonus points by dropping a couple tonnes of bombs on every single

- YPG stronghold point
- any other terrorist point that have made threats against Turkey
- give an ultimatum to Iraq regime (after all they are now officially funding the PKK)
.......
 
.
Iran might have hit Turkish soldiers, Pentagon says

A drone that killed four Turkish soldiers last week in Syria might belong to Iran, the Pentagon has said.

There are four actors who might have conducted the deadly attack, a senior U.S. official told Hürriyet following a report in which a senior Turkish official said an Iranian-made drone was used in the attack in northern Syria.

“These are the coalition, Russia, the Assad regime and Iran-backed Shia militias,” said the U.S. official.

“It is not the coalition. ‘We didn’t,’ Russia said. There is no reason for them to conduct such an attack, and also there is no indication contradicting what they say. So the only two left are the regime and the militias. Iran has the capability. We know that they have armed UAVs. And there are Shia militias around Rasm al-Abboud where this UAV took off from. So it might be Iran,” the official said.

Turkey identified the drone as Iranian-made, but it has still not identified whether Hezbollah, the Quds Force or another Shiite militia group in Syria had used it, Hürriyet Daily Newsreporter Sevil Erkuş quoted the Turkish official as saying on Dec. 7.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ir...ys--.aspx?pageID=238&nID=107069&NewsCatID=352
 
.
Iran might have hit Turkish soldiers, Pentagon says

A drone that killed four Turkish soldiers last week in Syria might belong to Iran, the Pentagon has said.

There are four actors who might have conducted the deadly attack, a senior U.S. official told Hürriyet following a report in which a senior Turkish official said an Iranian-made drone was used in the attack in northern Syria.

“These are the coalition, Russia, the Assad regime and Iran-backed Shia militias,” said the U.S. official.

“It is not the coalition. ‘We didn’t,’ Russia said. There is no reason for them to conduct such an attack, and also there is no indication contradicting what they say. So the only two left are the regime and the militias. Iran has the capability. We know that they have armed UAVs. And there are Shia militias around Rasm al-Abboud where this UAV took off from. So it might be Iran,” the official said.

Turkey identified the drone as Iranian-made, but it has still not identified whether Hezbollah, the Quds Force or another Shiite militia group in Syria had used it, Hürriyet Daily Newsreporter Sevil Erkuş quoted the Turkish official as saying on Dec. 7.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ir...ys--.aspx?pageID=238&nID=107069&NewsCatID=352

It seems Pentagon is super interested to drive a wedge between Iran and Turkey to rise tension between them, especially in Syria (while city of Aleppo is being fully liberated). US drones are regularly flying and hitting IS-held areas in Aleppo and Raqqa, while Iranian drones mostly fly over Aleppo city, South Aleppo CS and Idlib. There is no reason for Iran to target Turkish soldiers and it doesn't even make sense. There is another scenario: US has conducted the drone strike, either intentionally or by mistake. If it was a mistake, it would make perfect sense to blame Iran and run from the blame, instead of taking responsibility and causing even more tension in already exacerbated US-Turkey relations. If it was intentional, it wouldn't need further explanations.
 
.
if its true, a few airstrikes in syria targeting mullahs and lebanon hezbollah will do just fine..
 
.
at the end innocents people and soldiers lose their life for a pure evil pretentiousnesses and wishes.

If erdogan didnt involve in syria and iraq if he closed his borders how many lifes could be saved and that apply to abdullah of jordan and those of lebanon.

If Syrians win this war it will be the first time in our region where good wins against evil!!!

Allah's soldiers against Satins soldiers.

What after Syrians and Iraqis genocides will be totally different than what was before.

History in making by the blood of our poor innocents men, women and kids :cry:

May Allah accept these sacrifices.
 
.
It seems Pentagon is super interested to drive a wedge between Iran and Turkey to rise tension between them, especially in Syria (while city of Aleppo is being fully liberated). US drones are regularly flying and hitting IS-held areas in Aleppo and Raqqa, while Iranian drones mostly fly over Aleppo city, South Aleppo CS and Idlib. There is no reason for Iran to target Turkish soldiers and it doesn't even make sense. There is another scenario: US has conducted the drone strike, either intentionally or by mistake. If it was a mistake, it would make perfect sense to blame Iran and run from the blame, instead of taking responsibility and causing even more tension in already exacerbated US-Turkey relations. If it was intentional, it wouldn't need further explanations.

Turkey drove a wegde in its relationship with Iran when it decided to let terrorists roam in Syria. It has indirectly been responsible for hundreds of Iranian casualties. If Iran did indeed attack Turkish soldiers by a drone attack, it is nothing more than an expected response by grabbing an unique opportunity in which case the illegal invasion of Turkish soldiers into Syria.
 
.
Turkey drove a wegde in its relationship with Iran when it decided to let terrorists roam in Syria. It has indirectly been responsible for hundreds of Iranian casualties. If Iran did indeed attack Turkish soldiers by a drone attack, it is nothing more than an expected response by grabbing an unique opportunity in which case the illegal invasion of Turkish soldiers into Syria.
well if this indeed turns out to be true. you better hide your monkey a** we are coming after you in syria along with your mullahs..
 
. .
You can't do a damn thing.
why not? are you scaring us with your military photoshop which is still using 1940s soviet junk... i even doubt you live in iran since the mullahs would'nt allowed you in the internet, i can't wait till trump takes office you will be sanctioned untill you collapse
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom