Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
you and the writer of the article are on another levelPlease read this on how there are some uncanny resemblances between S300 and Bavar which proves that there had to have been some foreign Russian help:
Analysis of Iran’s Bavar 373 SAM: Indigenous Design or S-300 Copycat?
On August 21, 2019, the Iranian Defense Ministry revealed the “Bavar 373” long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, claiming that both design and production are completely indigenous. Iranian President Rouhani and Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Commander Hossein Salami were presentt-intell.com
from the samee article
then the writer find where bavar copied S-300vThe Bavar 373’s dual-band sensor suite seems to be the system’s most valuable asset. The originality of the Bavar’s TEL and the claimed operational performance of the Sayyad-4 SAM are nevertheless disputable.
HOT VERTICAL LAUNCH/SQUARE CANISTERS. While the Bavar is widely believed to be a S-300PMU2-inspired design, the system’s rectangular launch tubes more closely resemble the M901 launcher unit of the Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC)-2 configuration. Like the Patriot, the Bavar 373 uses a hot launch technique instead of the cold ejection typical for Russian SAM launchers.
and again he find a similarity in sensors i bolded itThe Bavar does, however, bear similarity with the S-300 when it comes to the full vertical launch position. In contrast, the American M901 fires from a 70 degree angle, a design feature copied by another Iran air defence system
intrestingly the writer forget Bavar-373 use two AESA radar while even S400 use a reflection type of space feeded phased-array AKA PESA and another transmission type of space feeded phased array antenna AKA again PESASENSOR SUITE. For the public demonstration, the Bavar 373 was augmented by two AESA radars, one engagement and one acquisition radar. This configuration is similar to the Russian S-300. The MIM-140 Patriot uses only one radar. Both of the Iranian radars are unique in their design and show little to no similarity with their American or Russian counterparts. it is possible that Iran’s decade-long effort to develop AESA radars has finally paid off. Due to the AESA’s frequency-agility and low-probability of intercept, the Bavar’s radars are – at least in theory – highly resilient to jamming and anti-radiation missiles.
even S-500 rely on a PESA for detecting targets
then it claim these two are the same
then the genius writer of the article claim
yes , he question trust vectoring capabilities of Sayyad-4 because iran only showed it at the time of firing it not 200km away from launcherMULTI-MISSION. The Bavar’s diverse sensor and kinetic solutions will enable the Iranian air defence units to conduct both anti-aircraft and missile defence missions. The Sayyad-4, in particular, was developed to intercept large radar-cross section targets at the engagement envelope edge, e.g. ballistic missiles in lower endo-atmospheric space. However, doubts remain whether the Sayyad-4 has the manoeuvring capability to prosecute evasive ballistic missiles in their terminal phase. The Sayyad-4’s demonstrated thrust vectoring control is only used for initial trajectory alignment.
then it come and say Sayyad-4 is copy of 48N6E/E2 . for the comparison here are the missiles
you guys can decide for yourself , it seems the writer is a little blind
then the fool come and claim 3rd of khordad is equal to Buk and made the hilarious claim that Bavar is copy of multiple foreign system without providing any evidence , while its own article prove it otherwise
and at the end the usual western media response about any iranian achievement
It took Iran more than 10 years of design flops, development limbo, and dire financial conditions to produce the Bavar 373. There is no information on how many systems exist and will be produced. It is also unknown whether Iran is even able to mass-produce the system and maintain it. As the country remains under though political and economic pressure from the international community, Tehran frequently exaggerates its military capabilities for foreign policy and deterrence reasons.
somebody ask him how long it take for russia to build s-400 or S-500 or USA to build Patriot or Israel to build arrow
I told you who is the real muslim , not to drink or fast or pray is the easy part , go and read those part of Quran I told you to read and sit and think how much you are like what ir describeIm a Muslim, I dont drink! So you just made takfir on me...so have you opened my heart or are you playing God now? Choose your next moves carefully because youre on thin ice. Unless of course you dont care what God thinks? About as much as I expect from an inept pajeet troll. Yeah any patriotic Iranian would take offense at being called Russian, and I have noticed an uptick in your saltiness after me calling you out as a pajeet. Seems its your nerves which have caused you to pucker up.
problem is there is far better alternative in air defence system and thats our own airdefence system .Whats wrong with buying Russian when the alternative is nothing. We know youre a western loving Russophobe Palestinian, but whats that got to do with Iran? Iran should be looking to the east more so than the west because China wasnt the ones who have staged coups in Iran or shared weapons and intelligence to kill Iranians. I made this point to you in another thread and here you are trolling your garbage here. These so called unfavourable deals have made Iran as the biggest economy in the region, surpassing Turkey and Saudi Arabia? Why does this burn you? Iran is closer to Russia and China more than ever and this will be a much needed lifeline if the West, who hates Iran and Iranian people's guts, were to attack Iran. You'd like to see that wouldn't you?
Last edited: