What's new

'Iranian gas to be four-time cheaper for India'

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
'Iranian gas to be four-time cheaper for India'

ISLAMABAD (March 13 2008): The gas from Iran via Pakistan is four-time cheaper for India than LNG or Iranian gas import through deep-sea gas pipeline by New Delhi. The Iranian gas will be cheaper for India even if the price included the transit fee payment to Pakistan.

This was stated in a research paper prepared by Zahid Asghar of the Quaid-i-Azam University and Ms Ayesha Nazuk of the Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU). The paper was presented at the 23rd annual general meeting and conference of the Pakistan Society of Development Economists (PSDE) and the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (Pide) here on Wednesday.

The paper, entitled 'Iran, Pakistan, India Gas Pipeline - An Economic Analysis in Game Theocratic Framework', says the project is economically viable, but it might suffer due to geo-political scenario of all the three countries involved. One main player of this game is the United States, which is aimed at isolating Iran on both economic and political front.

Pakistan has always been enthusiastic to start IPI project, but India has whether explicitly or implicitly showed reluctance to join the project. The IPI project is pending due to many geo-political, geo-strategic and geo-economic factors. But concentrating on the geo-economic ones, mainly due to the transit fee issues, Pakistan has been demanding transit fee of US 50 cents per million British Thermal Units (MBTU), while India wants it to be US 15 cents per MBTU.

India can import Iranian gas through Pakistan the most viable economic route, but politically fragile one given the past history of both the countries in mind. Both countries lack confidence in each other, said the paper.

Another important paper, entitled 'How Pakistan is coping with the challenges of high oil prices', authored by Afia Malik of Pide, observed that that Pakistan's limited refining capacity led to heavy dependence on the imports of petroleum products. The demand for refined petroleum products greatly exceeds domestic oil refining capacity, so nearly half of Pakistani imports are refined products.

According the demand for petroleum products in the country is about 16 million tonnes out of which only 18 percent are met through local resources while the balance 82 percent is met through imports.

Since the late 1980s, Pakistan has not experienced any new oil fields. As a result oil production has remained fairly flat at around 60,000 barrels per day. While there is no prospect for Pakistan to attain self-sufficiency in oil, the government has encouraged private (including foreign) firms to develop domestic production capacity.

In the downstream the oil sector there are seven refineries working in the country as on July 1, 2006, with the total capacity of refining 284660 barrels per day or 12.88 million tonnes per annum. Given the level of oil resources there is no likelihood for the country to attain self-sufficiency in oil, Pakistan's net oil imports are projected to rise substantially in coming years.

Even if the high cost of oil imports is managed, the country lacks the necessary infrastructure to handle the increasing volumes of imported oil. Since prices are rising swiftly there is a need for huge investment to improve the infrastructure (ie, refinery) to reduce the import bill of the country. The government has given incentives in the form of Petroleum Policy 1997 to attract private investors.

Here it would be useful to add that the bulk of the crude oil requirement of the country refineries is met through government to government contracts with Saudi Arabia. The terms of these contracts are not made public and refineries are charged market (international) related prices, any benefit or discount goes to the government.

The net imports for the period 2001 to 2006, correspond to a base oil price of $28.21 per barrel in 2001, which increase by $14 per barrel in 2006, that is, increase of $36.93 per barrel, equivalent to 130.9 percent increase of the base price. The ratio calculated for Pakistan comes out to be (-5.47), it indicates the proportional loss in GDP as a result of price increase of $36.93 is equivalent to a shock lowering GDP by 5.5 percent.

Our petroleum imports account for 24 percent of total imports and represented up to 44 percent of export earnings in 2006-07. While in 1999-2000, the share of petroleum imports was 27 percent of total imports and accounts for 33 percent of total export earnings.

Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]
 
:pakistan::pakistan::pakistan:but india not trust pakistan over gas pipe line i think this line make trust more.but india do difrent always:chilli::chilli::victory::victory:
 
So, Pakistan is in desperation to include India in this project. Any pipeline through Pakistan is not safe.
 
So, Pakistan is in desperation to include India in this project. Any pipeline through Pakistan is not safe.

How is Pakistan desperate? The price of gas has nothing to do with us, its up to the Iranians. The financial benefit for Pakistan would be transit fees.

If you are referring to the study itself, well there are several on Indo-Pak trade sponsored and/or conducted by Indian organizations/analysts that highlight the benefits Pakistan would accrue from opening up trade with India - so based on that, should we consider India to be "desperate to have trade with Pakistan"?
 
The thinking that Pakistan is deperate to include India in the project is stupid one. Iran and Pakistan only want India to join because then they can finalize the pipeline that is to be laid. Incase India joins the project then a larger diameter pipeline shall be laid to accommodate the gas for India. If India decides not to join than a smaller diameter pipeline shall be laid thus reducing the cost of the project.

However after the laying of the pipeline if India decides to join the project then an additional pipeline shall be required to be laid parallel to the one already laid. This shall increase the cost of the project and India shall have to bear the cost since the piepline shall be laid specifically for India. In the end India shall be the one loosing.
 
AM, trade and oil are two different things. Oil is always a strategic one and thats why we see a lots of crisis in Afghan and Iraq.
 
AM, trade and oil are two different things. Oil is always a strategic one and thats why we see a lots of crisis in Afghan and Iraq.

I understand that Gas and oil might be considered more "strategic" than mere "trade", but my point was regarding the "desperate" comment. Pakistan has actually been willing to to sign a bilateral agreement with Iran on this for several months now - the Iranians have been giving India more time ostensibly because they get to sell more product, as well as reduce the chances of US pressure on interrupting those exports in some fashion due to a multi party contract, especially one that involves an economy the size of India that the US would be loath to sanction.

I don't think any country is necessarily desperate in this situation - the Iranians and Pakistanis just want the damn thing built - bilateral or trilateral - India will continue importing gas and oil the way it has...
 
AM, I am not saying that Pakistan is wrong. Every nation is desperate to achieve some strategic advantage. I am just pointing about the interest behind it.
 
:chilli::chilli::chilli:so wait until a big energy crisis catch india then your contry need gas but there is nothing:pakistan::pakistan::pakistan::yahoo::yahoo:
 
How is Pakistan desperate? The price of gas has nothing to do with us, its up to the Iranians. The financial benefit for Pakistan would be transit fees.

If you are referring to the study itself, well there are several on Indo-Pak trade sponsored and/or conducted by Indian organizations/analysts that highlight the benefits Pakistan would accrue from opening up trade with India - so based on that, should we consider India to be "desperate to have trade with Pakistan"?

Another benefit for Pakistan would be the shared cost for the pipeline if India enters the deal but we're determined to go ahead with the project 'avec ou sans' India.
 
'Iranian gas to be four-time cheaper for India'

ISLAMABAD (March 13 2008): The gas from Iran via Pakistan is four-time cheaper for India than LNG or Iranian gas import through deep-sea gas pipeline by New Delhi. The Iranian gas will be cheaper for India even if the price included the transit fee payment to Pakistan.


can any one of you get access to as to how this figure of 4times the cost was calculated, and over what period of time has this cost calculation been done.

thanks in advance.
 
^

if some one can provide with a link of this report of how these calculations were done would be just great.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom