What's new

Iranian foreign minister to visit India in coming days

You have won for the time being I agr

Totally understandable that it is your time to celebrate. Indeed, Pakistan has played it's cards well. However two things remain to be seen

1. How much advantage will pakistan be able to derive from this recent victory.
2. Whether what happened was the final nail in the coffin of The Great Game or just the Beginning of a New Chapter.

But yes, for now, you celebrate and we wait.

As I said earlier, the new reality definitely suits you better than us. Whether this new reality is a relatively permanent one or just a transitional one is something for the time to decide.

LOL at you have won for the time being. This victory is for ages Ganesh.
 
.
Why should you think that all "Islamic Republics" should toe Pakistan's line? Nepal and India have bad relations too but nobody thinks about it on religious lines that being a Hindu majority nation they should side with us. Iran should build upon the historical relations between India and Iran for preventing anyone running roughshod over Afghanistan.
I love indias historical relationships with iran, afghan and central asia. On the one hand indians complain about muslim inbadiin and what they did to fictional united india. On the other hand they value these relationships of invasion and ***-rape.
 
.
Why hasn’t Pakistan recognize the IEA as their ally yet? This is to ensure Iran and India doesn’t violate their sovereignty.
 
Last edited:
.
Why hasn’t Pakistan recognize the Taliban as their ally yet? This is to ensure Iran and India doesn’t violate their sovereignty.
Pakistan wants Turkey first recognize. But Erdogan replied, he need to consult NATO, then he will make his move. But that's for sure, Pakistan won't be the first one. Without US signal no one will dare to make move, not even Qatar
 
.
Iran is Pakistan's brotherly nation. My advise would be to be cautious with cunning India. Iran definitely is not Pakistan's enemy but India definitely is enemy of Muslims and will use Iran against Pakistan like in kuldhushan case. This way they will also create rift between the 2 because pakistan will be forced to act overtly, covertly or diplomatically.
Before the revolution, Iran was definitely Pakistan's brother, Shah thought of Pakistanis as his fellow Aryan brothers was purely motivated by racial bonds and wasn't a religious zealot to be bogged down by sectarian differences of the current regime. He aided Pakistan with weapons and supplies during our wars with India.

Sadly the opposition is true with the current regime in Iran, they will only accept Pakistan if the latter fully accept their hegemony in the region.
 
.
LOL at you have won for the time being. This victory is for ages Ganesh.
I can reply to you in the same coin about the name calling but then I don't wanna fall down to level of "elite members". About the victory for being ages , are you really that naive ?

USA, a superpower, couldn't keep Afganistan for 20 years. You have hardly anything to offer Taliban that Iran or India can't. Let Taliban settle down as the official government that will need "cooperation" from "not just pakistan".

The events of last two decades show that India has learnt the art of creating unrest from Pakistan and even left it behind. Unless Pakistan reconciles with India, it can never achieve its full potential to grow as a nation.
 
.
I love indias historical relationships with iran, afghan and central asia. On the one hand indians complain about muslim inbadiin and what they did to fictional united india. On the other hand they value these relationships of invasion and ***-rape.
Apart from the filthy language, a very valid argument.

Relations between India and Iran don't have any religious baggage. What the invaders did to Indian population for conversion should ideally impact the the converts most. After all they bore the brunt of torture. If the "converts" whose ancestors were tortured and converted can have great relations with the invading nation, why can't those who resisted it successfully?
 
. .
Apart from the filthy language, a very valid argument.

Relations between India and Iran don't have any religious baggage. What the invaders did to Indian population for conversion should ideally impact the the converts most. After all they bore the brunt of torture. If the "converts" whose ancestors were tortured and converted can have great relations with the invading nation, why can't those who resisted it successfully?
You do realize that close to 50 percent of pak are iranic people not indic? You do realize that islam did not spread by the sword as you hindutva like to cope.

you think you are being smart but you are mistaken.
 
.
You do realize that close to 50 percent of pak are iranic people not indic? You do realize that islam did not spread by the sword as you hindutva like to cope.

you think you are being smart but you are mistaken.
dude these guys are f-ing retarted
imagine "forcing" millions and millions of people to convert through "torture", like how do you even torture millions to convert?
idiots and most weren't even Hindus, they were Buddhists who converted (so a old conversion)

Its just their little d*** syndrome constantly and consistently showing up, brainwashed f*** faces
 
Last edited:
. .
You do realize that close to 50 percent of pak are iranic people not indic? You do realize that islam did not spread by the sword as you hindutva like to cope.

you think you are being smart but you are mistaken.

Close to 50% are Iranic! Are the people from following regions Irani?
Sindh
Punjab
KPK
Azad Kashmir

If yes , I will learn something. If no, you are being dishonest here.


About Islam spreading through swords - Medieval times were different from today's world so present day Muslim countries like UAE , Qatar etc don't represent the situation that might have prevailed in the Medieval times. A close approximation is Taliban. Last time they were in power in Afghanistan, they were destroying Bamiyan Budhhas. What , in your opinion, would have happened to Buddhists if they were there in Afghanistan when the Bamiyan Budhhas were razed to the ground ? Something similar would have been experienced by hindus when mosques like Quwwat ul Islam mosque were constructed by the very material derived from demolished temples.
dude these guys are f-ing retarted
imagine "forcing" millions and millions of people to convert through "torture", like how do you even torture millions to convert?
idiots and most weren't even Hindus, they were Buddhists who converted (so a old conversion)

Its just their little d*** syndrome constantly and consistently showing up, brainwashed f*** faces
Funny how easily you find refuge in male reproductory organ instead of valid arguments. Bordering on rainbow revolution, eh?
 
. .
Close to 50% are Iranic! Are the people from following regions Irani?
Sindh
Punjab
KPK
Azad Kashmir

If yes , I will learn something. If no, you are being dishonest here.


About Islam spreading through swords - Medieval times were different from today's world so present day Muslim countries like UAE , Qatar etc don't represent the situation that might have prevailed in the Medieval times. A close approximation is Taliban. Last time they were in power in Afghanistan, they were destroying Bamiyan Budhhas. What , in your opinion, would have happened to Buddhists if they were there in Afghanistan when the Bamiyan Budhhas were razed to the ground ? Something similar would have been experienced by hindus when mosques like Quwwat ul Islam mosque were constructed by the very material derived from demolished temples.

Funny how easily you find refuge in male reproductory organ instead of valid arguments. Bordering on rainbow revolution, eh?
So sick and tired of educating you guys. Pushtun are similar to afghans and iranic language. Baluch are similar to beluch (iranians) and speak iranic language. Pakistan is a very much a pashtun country.

Punjabi and sindhi speak an indic language. Baluch and pushtun are embedded in punjab amd sindh for centuries to the point they are completely punjabized.

gilgit is basically central asia.

what do you think a tamil like you has that is similar to iran or afghanistan or even a punjabi?

but go ahead, talk to them and then abuse muslims and islam.
 
.
I don't think that a single visit would cancel any major agreements. All of Pakistans friends except China have good relations with India. Why can't Iran have? Iran's position regarding Taliban is already known and it will be confirmed again by the Supreme leader in his upcoming speeches.
Why does Iran need to have good relations with India, care to explain?
You want Chinese investment and wish to be a part of BRI, and at the same time would support China and Pakistan's enemies? This double game needs to be stopped, you'll have to choose eventually.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom