Yeah the British had nothing to do with the defeat of Ottomans and the American troops in the middle east are for sight seeing only. Iran also doesn't provide any long range drones to AnsarAllah. The pinpoint strikes on oil refineries were fake. Saudis never executed no political dissident. Khashoggi was a terrorist not a journalist. MBS is a saint. And Shias need to learn their religion from you.
The Ottomans were not some holy cows. They were a declining entity for centuries prior to the Arab Revolt (where the House of Saud were not even involved, go read some elementary history of the region that you are discussing before posting outright lies, no disrespect again) and only had very little nominal control of Arabia (sometimes no control) which was otherwise ruled by local dynasties. At that time there were the Young Turks movement and rebellions elsewhere. In any case none of this has anything to do with what I wrote or the unification of KSA or the House of Saud. Once again, read about the regions history first.
I specifically wrote mainly drones. 99.99% of them being useless in the sense of doing no damage inside KSA and being shot down by KSA. Outside of that attack 3 years ago on unprotected oil production facilities that were repaired within days, nothing remotely noteworthy in terms of drone attacks can be mentioned. As far as ballistic missiles, 99% of them are being shot down or hitting empty space. Vast majority of them belonged to the Yemeni army stockpiles and originate from the USSR era. It is common knowledge that can be easily googled. As for partial missile tech transfer, as I wrote, there have likely been some, but nothing groundbreaking or sophisticated. If that was the case, we would have seen far more succesfull attacks on KSA but we see none other than the drone attack 3 years ago on largely unprotected oil facilities over 1000 km away from the border of Yemen (I doubt that we will see a repeat for obvious reasons, as I wrote) or some border skirmishes along the mostly mountainous border.
Sure, just like Iran never executing any political dissidents.
en.wikipedia.org
Iran is in a completely different league compared to KSA. Can't even compare it. Iran is executing athletes, political prisoners etc. on a far greater scale than anything KSA has ever done. Iran's execution rate per capita is also much bigger than that of KSA. We are comparing apples and oranges here.
Khashoggi was killed yes, likely by the order of MBS but so what, you blindly support a Supreme Leader (LOL at that name) who has killed 100's of Iranian dissidents home and abroad.
en.wikipedia.org
Executing wrestlers even;
en.wikipedia.org
Claims of him murdering a policemen during protests yet KSA similarly accuses Nimr al-Nimr and his few followers of killing civilians and security personel in Al-Qatif.
It is a fact that Iranian Wilayat al-Faqih is a new cult-like creation and only a minority of Shias worldwide follow or agree with this notion. Al-Sistani is firmly against it. So are the actual local Shia Arab clerics in Karbala and Najaf (the actual spiritual Shia centers of the world, not Iran).
Anyway I don't care about the House of Saud, they are not religious figures, but they are competent leaders and most locals support them which is evident when looking at the ground realities. You on the other hand blindly follow some leaders of a foreign nation just due to religious reasons alone. Therein lies the difference.
