Iranian Chill Thread

[haman10]

@Prince of Persia

azizam manam balad boodam beram thread dorost konam .......

man avalin kesi boodam ke oomadam inja post kardam , hatman salah nabood vagarna bekhoda baladam tarjome konam ....

kholase kare khoobi nakardi

 

[Prince of Persia]

@haman10

eshkali nadereh, in pakestaniha kheli poroo hastan. This news will make them burn.

 

[mohsen]

تا حالا چیزی در مورد داغتر بودن کاسه از آش شنیدی؟
طرف خودش اعتراف کرده و عذر خواهی هم کرده حالا بعضی ها می گن ماجرا دروغ بوده
ببین ....
نه ولش کن نمی خواد ببینی

خداییش این منبعت رو بده من بذارم تو لیست سیاه
شخصی که شلیک کرده مداح نبوده، سرنشین دیگه ماشین بوده، خودم شخصا از جناب دادستان تو تلوزیون شنیدم، کل این خبر هدفی نداشته جز تخریب چهره مداح، دلیلش هم که معلومه
------
شاید منظورتون از عذرخواهی این هست:

از آنها که ندانسته چیزی نوشتند گذشتم برای آنهایی هم که پی جنجال بودند طلب مغفرت میکنم/ ما از بی‏بی‏سی و اسرائیل جز رذالت انتظار نداریم ولی دستگاه سیدالشهدا باعث شده که دشمنان هم از ما انتظار پاکی داشته باشند
-------------
محمود کریمی شلیک نکرده است - سایت خبری تحلیلی تابناك

سخنگوی دستگاه قضا در تشریح ماجرا گفت: بر اساس اعلام شاکی و مداح معروف مشخص شده سه خودرو در اتوبان شهید بابایی مسیر شرق به غرب در حرکت بوده‌اند که دو تای آن‌ها ۲۰۶ و یکی از آن‌ها مزدا بوده است. شاکی پرونده مدعی شد که در ‌تونل سبقت می‌گیرد و این در حالی است که پس از این سبقت، خودروی آقای کریمی برای وی چراغ می‌زند و این فرد هم از خط وسط به خط کناری منتقل می‌شود. شاکی می‌گوید پس از این کار،‌ صدای چند تیر می‌شنود که یکی از این تیر‌ها به خودرو اصابت می‌کند.

محسنی اژه‌ای گفت: پس از این اتفاق ماشین شاکی و ماشین آقای کریمی در گوشه اتوبان می‌ایستند و با یکدیگر به واسطه شناختن همدیگر احوال‌پرسی می‌کنند و سپس خداحافظی کرده‌اند. شاکی ادامه می‌دهد که فردای روز حادثه ‌چند تن از دوستانش به وی می‌گویند از آنجا که ماشینت تیر خورده نمی‌توانی آن را بفروشی و درست کنی به همین دلیل شاکی به پلیس مراجعه می‌کند.

وی افزود: پس از حضور شاکی در مرجع انتظامی پرونده تکمیل شده و از شاکی و همچنین مداح معروف آقای کریمی تحقیقات انجام می‌شود، در حالی که شاکی می‌گوید شکایتی ندارد و فقط خسارت ماشینش را می‌خواهد. این در حالی است که فردی که همراه آقای کریمی بوده مدعی شده که اسلحه برای وی بوده و اجازه شلیک هم داشته است و از این فرد هم تحقیقاتی به عمل آمده است.

اظهارات متناقض وجود دارد

اژه‌ای گفت: در حال حاضر هنوز قرار نهایی برای این پرونده صادر نشده است اما با توجه به تحقیقاتی که انجام شده به زودی قرار صادر می‌شود.

دادستان کل کشور در پاسخ به این سؤال که آیا این پرونده از جنبه عمومی مورد رسیدگی قرار می‌گیرد یا خیر، گفت: به طور قطع پس از انجام تحقیقات اگر ضرورت داشته باشد از جنبه عمومی هم مورد رسیدگی قرار می‌گیرد.

وی گفت: باید بررسی شود ‌فردی که ادعا می‌کند اسلحه برای وی بوده و همچنین مجوز حمل سلاح داشته در هنگام استفاده از آن قوانین و ضوابط را رعایت کرده یا خیر؟

سخنگوی قوه قضاییه تصریح کرد: البته برخی از اظهارات شاکی و دو خودروی دیگری که همراه وی بوده‌اند، متفاوت است و در برخی ‌اظهارنظر‌ها گفته‌اند که ما آقای کریمی را می‌شناختیم و فقط می‌خواستیم کمی سر به سر وی بگذاریم اما او فکر کرد قصد مزاحمت برایش داریم.

 

[haman10]

bebinid thread ru close kardan va gand raft toosh ......

baghiye ham baladan rooye "post a new thread" click konan be khoda ...

dige alan maze ham nadare yeki dige dorost konim ...... oona khodeshoon miran tooye bakhsh pakistan va ma dige hich controlli rooye troll ha nadarim ....

peace

 

[KingMamba]

@Prince of Persia

China has never interfered on Pakistan's behalf against India. Pakistan and Iran have nearly the same military budget but Pakistan has a better air force, its army is designed to hold off an IA offensive and most of its hardware is either from China or the US which are the tops in technology today not to mention they are battle tested for years on end now. I agree Iran has a better navy and is self reliant but a lot of your stuff is untested you cannot possibly know the true capabilities unless you fight a war and find out. Chinese supplying Pakistan does not make Pakistan a client state most of the stuff they give is payed for at most they differ payments for Pakistan to a later date. On missile tech both countries have similar missiles and ranges but Pakistan has cruise missiles which Iran does not. I would say it is even in missiles. UAVs Pakistan is also producing UAVs.

Anyway I would say open a thread about it but I have seen the PAF versus IRIAF thread and it didn't go so well.

bebinid thread ru close kardan va gand raft toosh ......

baghiye ham baladan rooye "post a new thread" click konan be khoda ...

dige alan maze ham nadare yeki dige dorost konim ...... oona khodeshoon miran tooye bakhsh pakistan va ma dige hich controlli rooye troll ha nadarim ....

peace

Pakistanis and Iranians are an emotionally nationalistic lot and cannot debate on such things without bashing, you should know since you have done your fair share of bashing.

 

[haman10]

Pakistan and Iran have nearly the same military budget

lol pakistan (although poor) spends 9 billion dollars whereas iran only spends 6 ......

also iran owns pakistan in military power as we can clearly see ....

another also : our economy owns pakistan's economy as well , but u spend 3 billion dollars more

I would say it is even in missiles

you serious bro ?

UAVs Pakistan is also producing UAVs.

so even pakistani UAVs , navy and ground forces are better than iran good to know .....

still we are the ones who stand on our words and we dont spew BS . if we say we attack , then we do it .

there are some countries who threaten nuclear response

anyway , i dont know why are u mad ? we attacked a terrorist hideout for lords sake .....

we are still friends

Pakistanis and Iranians are an emotionally nationalistic lot and cannot debate on such things without bashing, you should know since you have done your fair share of bashing.

dear you dont know persian ......

i was super angry of @Prince of Persia for making the thread . i said it starts trolling .

you can ask aeronaut or loveicon since they know persian .

 

[mohsen]

bebinid thread ru close kardan va gand raft toosh ......

baghiye ham baladan rooye "post a new thread" click konan be khoda ...

dige alan maze ham nadare yeki dige dorost konim ...... oona khodeshoon miran tooye bakhsh pakistan va ma dige hich controlli rooye troll ha nadarim ....

peace

این تاپیکه کجا هست؟

 

[rahi2357]

@KingMamba
i am sorry for that nonesense thread bro

 

[haman10]

این تاپیکه کجا هست؟

Iran fires missile into Pakistan killing terrorists!!!

tooye war section

 

[KingMamba]

lol pakistan (although poor) spends 9 billion dollars whereas iran only spends 6 ......

also iran owns pakistan in military power as we can clearly see ....

another also : our economy owns pakistan's economy as well , but u spend 3 billion dollars more

you serious bro ?




so even pakistani UAVs , navy and ground forces are better than iran good to know .....

still we are the ones who stand on our words and we dont spew BS . if we say we attack , then we do it .

there are some countries who threaten nuclear response

anyway , i dont know why are u mad ? we attacked a terrorist hideout for lords sake .....

we are still friends

I said Iranian navy is better and Pakistan budget is $6 Billion increasing to $7B this fiscal term. I would say yes to ground forces and air forces but no to navy, I said missile tech is pretty even. Pakistan has never threatened to nuke Iran a few people online is not governmental response. Iranian may have better UAVs I never commented on UAV because I do not know about your UAV all I said was Pakistan produces its own too, like I said emotional lot.

I am not baradar but your response shows you are.

@haman10 I only quoted you because of the previous PAF vs IRIAF thread.

@KingMamba
i am sorry for that none sense thread bro

@Prince of Persia
baba damet garm ba in thread zadanet.. kash vazire omoore khareje mishodi ye rooze jang mishod kole donya mirikht saremoon.
vaghti dolate iran ba dolate pakestan manovre moshtarak mizare akhe chera kaseye daghtar az ash mishio hamchin cm hay tahrikamiz mizari???
bebakhshida intor goftam vali bishtar deghat kon too thread zadan

Nothing to be sorry about bro if the news is true it will be reopened with more sources.

 

[spiderkiller]

@Prince of Persia

China has never interfered on Pakistan's behalf against India. Pakistan and Iran have nearly the same military budget but Pakistan has a better air force, its army is designed to hold off an IA offensive and most of its hardware is either from China or the US which are the tops in technology today not to mention they are battle tested for years on end now. I agree Iran has a better navy and is self reliant but a lot of your stuff is untested you cannot possibly know the true capabilities unless you fight a war and find out. Chinese supplying Pakistan does not make Pakistan a client state most of the stuff they give is payed for at most they differ payments for Pakistan to a later date. On missile tech both countries have similar missiles and ranges but Pakistan has cruise missiles which Iran does not. I would say it is even in missiles. UAVs Pakistan is also producing UAVs.

Anyway I would say open a thread about it but I have seen the PAF versus IRIAF thread and it didn't go so well.



Pakistanis and Iranians are an emotionally nationalistic lot and cannot debate on such things without bashing, you should know since you have done your fair share of bashing.

so you think our stuff needs to be tested in a real war ? then you think what are we doing in syria ? pakistan is producing UAVs ? yeah of course every country can create a toy and call it a military production. you can say you are producing UAVs when you used them for 2 years in a guerrilla war against rebels which the number of their militants is more than a country s population.

 

[KingMamba]

so you think our stuff needs to be tested in a real war ? then you think what are we doing in syria ? pakistan is producing UAVs ? yeah of course every country can create a toy and call it a military production. you can say you are producing UAVs when you used them for 2 years in a guerrilla war against rebels which the number of their militants is more than a country s population.

Most Iranians say they are just advising in Syria if you say you are actively engaged in the fight I will take your word for it. What you say about toy making I can also say about you I do not need to remind you what many defense analysts say about your government claims militarily speaking so we can chill with the mud slinging. Pakistan has been at war for more than a decade so more Pakistani weapons have been used in battle since that time.

 

[mohsen]

 

[spiderkiller]

Most Iranians say they are just advising in Syria if you say you are actively engaged in the fight I will take your word for it. What you say about toy making I can also say about you I do not need to remind you what many defense analysts say about your government claims militarily speaking so we can chill with the mud slinging. Pakistan has been at war for more than a decade so more Pakistani weapons have been used in battle since that time.

do you know the meaning of engaging directly ? it means sending troops. while sending high tech military stuff is not engaging its helping allies with the technology they need.

 

[KingMamba]

do you know the meaning of engaging directly ? it means sending troops. while sending high tech military stuff is not engaging its helping allies with the technology they need.

Then it is not being tested by yourselves but used by your allies whereas Pakistan is using its own tech in battle by itself, there is a difference because your armed forces doctrine may be different to Syrian doctrine. BTW this is what you said in the bold below so you implied Iran has been using its UAVs against rebels, your wording implied as such next time be more clear.

so you think our stuff needs to be tested in a real war ? then you think what are we doing in syria ? pakistan is producing UAVs ? yeah of course every country can create a toy and call it a military production. you can say you are producing UAVs when you used them for 2 years in a guerrilla war against rebels which the number of their militants is more than a country s population.