You are not right about Dagestan. Only a portion of oppositions are islamists and only a portion of them can be categorized as dangerous ones. Even the situation in Chechenia is not something like what you described. Many of extremists are actually from a naqshbandi soufi cult who live in some limited parts of Chechenia. Anyway, I don't know what is your source for these claims, but it is wrong. Statistically speaking, it is the same as claiming that all Iranians are wahabi, while as we all know, such a claim would be extremely wrong.
In Russia’s Dagestan, Salafi Muslims clash with government authorities - The Washington Post
The evolution of Dagestani Salafism | Russia Beyond The Headlines ASIA
Dagestan | Salafi Islam | The Caucasus | GlobalPost
Sowing Rebellion in Dagestan? |
There are many more, danger of Salafi extremists in Russia is not to be taken lightly. If the Russians lose control (which is highly unlikely) same thing that is happening in Syria will happen in Russia.
Salafis are in conflict with Sufis, because Sufis are mainly pro-gov, and they (Sufis) are actually recognized by the government, whereas Wahhabis are not, so basically Wahhabis have found Sufis in their way of dominance over the region. Read the passage in the book below if you are interested.
Dagestan: Russian Hegemony and Islamic Resistance in the North Caucasus - Robert Bruce Ware, Ware, Enver Kisriev - Google Books
Salafis currently have presence in Georgia (very minor presence), Chechnya (heavy presence), Dagestan (moderate to heavy presence, with backing of Saudis and probably Qataris), they also maintain presence in some of the other former Soviet Republics.
I understand your point that not everyone there is Wahabbi, but they are the ones that will gain control (thanks to their financial backers) if everything goes to shit.
"Salafis dislike the Sufi alliance with the government. Sufis run the government-sanctioned Spiritual Board of Muslims, to which the official clergy belong. They also support a secular state. Salafis do not." Wikipedia
Malaysians' IQ is 92?! I would question the validity of the report based on that alone!
What criterion were taken into consideration exactly? Many factors could affect the result of an IQ statistics even within the same locale, meaning if the population sample were to be taken from the city of Tehran, the
differences between results obtained from Upper middle class whose members are often more educated than the members of lower class whom would be taking the same test would have been determinant over the result of the statistics. That's why I generally dismiss the concept of IQ, especially at this scale.