TheImmortal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 7,091
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
You cannot wipe out an insurgency group like Hamas. Even if you do, another group will rise to take their place. Imagine how many young Palestinians the Zionists have radicalised with their massacres of civilians and Nazi rhetoric.
Doesn’t matter. If they don’t have proper weapons. If Hamas is destroyed and Gaza is occupied, you are back to 1990’s level of weapons. Basically some assault rifles and maybe an RPG if your lucky.
Recently the Zionists have spoken of reducing the size of Gaza and occupying part of it. Ethnic cleansing north Gaza --> 'temporary' occupation --> incremental annexation? But I don't think this really helps them - if they want to seriously degrade militant groups in Gaza they ought to occupy south Gaza to cut off the border with Egypt, not the north.
Zionists want Gaza and West Bank. Not sure why this surprises anyone. They want all that land.
Indeed. People vastly overstate the destructive impact of ballistic missiles and the amount of munitions needed for a war.
You underestimate the explosive shockwave effect of basic physics. A Mach 6th object smacking into the ground creates an explosive shockwave in itself that an air to ground munition can never match.
Google ‘Tungsten Rod project’. You can get to tactical nuke level destructive power by just launching rods from space.
Even 1000 Khorramshahr-4 missiles (note: we have only seen 6-10 delivered) successfully impacting in Tel Aviv will do very little (Israel has dropped 4x as much bombs in tiny Gaza in a week).
Nonsense.
1000 K-4’s = 1,500,000 kg explosives + kinetic shockwave effect of each missile which acts as a force multiplier.
Israel has not dropped 3,330,000 lbs of explosives on Gaza let alone “4x as much” which is an absurd 13M+ lbs of munitions.
I will agree that missiles cannot match a long term high frequency bombing campaign.