Taskforce
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
- Messages
- 886
- Reaction score
- -5
On what?Still waiting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On what?Still waiting
That is correct. I repeat: Are you saying the Iranian mission to the UN is lying? You can't answer?Well, you would then be saying Hamas is lying.
This delusional hopium will not age well.Broad strategic situation report:
- Zionia has transitioned from an offensive stance to a defensive one. The trigger was the 36 day war
- The Resistance is transitioning from a hold and surround strategy to an offensive one.
Shhhh.That is correct. I repeat: Are you saying the Iranian mission to the UN is lying? You can't answer?
This delusional hopium will not age well.
You can continue to cry about it but no one with Anguilla flags trying to be a gatekeeper of who can post here is going to get very far.Shhhh.
Coming to the conclusion you don’t mean well here. It’s clear to others as well. Just sayin’ son.
Ahhh. Finally comes out. Your posts reeked from the beginning. You folks are so obvious. You won’t get anywhere much like your kin before you. Ironically your staying power continues to diminish. Now that everyone knows let’s see how long you’d like to waste your time. Long live Anguilla .Heh.You can continue to cry about it but no one with Anguilla flags trying to be a gatekeeper of who can post here is going to get very far.
Solid balanced Israeli analysis of Iran and Hezbollah's role in recent events in Gaza.
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about, as usual. We all know Salar is crazy but at least he speaks in coherent sentences, you just babble incoherently.Ahhh. Finally comes out. Your posts reeked from the beginning. You folks are so obvious. You won’t get anywhere much like your kin before you. Ironically your staying power continues to diminish. Now that everyone knows let’s see how long you’d like to waste your time. Long live Anguilla .Heh.
That is correct. I repeat: Are you saying the Iranian mission to the UN is lying? You can't answer?
We all know Salar is crazy
What post here is not politically motivated?Mostly that I have the impression your stance on this matter tends to be politically motivated, in keeping with similar comments posted before.
Agreed.The statement attributed to the Iranian UN representation by a UK-based medium is formulated in classic diplomatic language and therefore subject to interpretation.
* “The decisions made by the Palestinian resistance are fiercely autonomous and unwaveringly aligned with the legitimate interests of the Palestinian people.” Obviously Iran never imposed decisions on the Palestinians. But this does not preclude any possible degree of mutual cooperation in the decision making process, let alone in other aspects such as prior training, armament, supply of intelligence and so on, all of which fall outside the scope of the quoted words.
This is not the ordinary reading of "we are not involved in Palestine's response" when interpreted holistically with the rest of the statement and the context behind it, and you probably know that.* “We emphatically stand in unflinching support of Palestine; however, we are not involved in Palestine's response, as it is taken solely by Palestine itself.” Can simply mean Iran is not directly partaking in the fight, again an obvious fact which comes in handy assuming the purpose is to establish plausible denial.
Actually, most Israeli sources are downplaying the role of Iran in recent events (they declared war against Hamas, not Iran).* “They are attempting to justify their failure and attribute it to Iran's intelligence power and operational planning.” Does not rule out actual Iranian contribution in the realms of intelligence and operational planning. What it does is to insist Tel Aviv has been trying to cover up glaring deficiencies in its security set up brought to light over the last days by invoking the Iranian bogeyman. Which isn't mutually exclusive with Iran actually assisting local Resistance forces.
I agree. But this would make Iran's response rather indirect. Perhaps I am greedy, but I would like to see direct actions inside Iran reciprocated by direct actions inside Israel.Furthermore, in the event that Iran was indeed uninformed of the move, the Palestinian Resistance would still owe to Iran a considerable portion of the capabilities which enabled it to achieve this. In this sense, Iran has acted against the zionist occupation regime one way or another, although I still consider the previously mentioned scenario to be the realistic one.
That was hyperbolic. I stand behind the gist of the message but it was nonetheless impolite of me to invoke your name like that.Do we? "We all know" is a common fallacy, by the way.
What post here is not politically motivated?
It is NOT established fact that Iran led the recent operations by Hamas and I would like to see a direct response to the settler colonial entity assassinating our top scientists and heroes on our streets - if you deem this a crime, mea culpa.
This is not the ordinary reading of "we are not involved in Palestine's response" when interpreted holistically with the rest of the statement and the context behind it, and you probably know that.
Actually, most Israeli sources are downplaying the role of Iran in recent events (they declared war against Hamas, not Iran).
I agree. But this would make Iran's response rather indirect. Perhaps I am greedy, but I would like to see direct actions inside Iran reciprocated by direct actions inside Israel.
Well Israeli outlet are downplaying the role of Iran in recent eventsMe decided to follow this one:
No airfields destroyed -> no Iran involved.
Does Hamas need Iranian permission to operate? No. Was there early coordination between Hamas, Iran, and Hezbollah? It's possible.
But, in the end, it is an action by Hamas based on it own interests arising from the Palestinian reality.
My assessment is also supported by the recent statement of the IDF spokesman who said, "Iran is a significant player, but we cannot say that it planned the operation or trained for it."