What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

There is no school for girls in Afghanistan anymore other than religious ones. it's time to wake up
wake uppppp

There were schools for girls in Afghanistan prior to the return of the Taleban. They continued to operate at least for some time after the takeover:

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-...h-calls-all-girls-be-allowed-back-2023-03-21/

And, they have been affected by the exact same type of phenomenon for several successive years, especially schools frequented by Hazara girls.

Investigations conducted by the UN could not find any evidence for poisoning. That's the issue here.

classic salar :)


I discussed this before. The Leader did not incriminate a hypothetical domestic group acting without foreign involvement, which is important to note.

Also as of yet the points I made were not addressed. It'd be more interesting if they were.
 
Last edited:
Hi

Intriguing posts.

Regarding the optical ball and missiles on each side, could this possibly be it:-
FbLpfwMUsAI6Ics


On the poster to the left, at the bottom, is an image that I cannot discern. Neither on the poster to the right, at the bottom.

As far as modified KOWSAR'S goes, imagine such combat a/c fitted out with an AESA radar (KLJ-7A --> LFK 601E --> Grifo E = Bayyenat-111). Bayyenat-111 *could* be the Phantom Warfare Radar Upgrade Project’ (perhaps the Jngnthi, or Janganzeh, project?), fitted with an ASEA array front end. As was done with the CAPTOR, RBE2, PS-05/A Mk 4, and of late the Grifo-346=Grifo E.

Furthermore, N/BVR AAM's (50 - 70km) such as the 'Red' Sparrow, an image of which was released some time back, and of course the Azarakhsh 2.

Or, allow me to play devil's advocate, something like this:-

fayfodox0aakabv-jpg.872666


Azarakhsh 2X?​
Thorn

I realize that this post should rather be in https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iriaf-news-and-discussions ... , but for the sake of easy reference I have posted here.

The s.c. 'Red Sparrow' AIM 7-E2, above, refers

In pics about todays Army Day, there was one shot featuring an 'AIM-9' to the front on a flatbed, two mystery 'missiles' obviously with wings and fins detached, in the middle, and at the rear looks like two Zoobin's. AIM 7E2?

I apologize, but even with knowledgeable help I just could not find the URL of these missiles to post it here.

Does anyone know what missiles these are:-

Thanks

Piet
 
Yes Khamenei confirmed it by his statements. But both scenarios are bad for IR.

1. If it an inside job then the regime is more crazy than we thought.
2. If it is a ''plot'' by the enemies of the regime then it shows how utterly incompetent the state security establishment is that the enemies chemical attacked hundreds of schools and thousands of school girls throughout whole Iran.

Considering that Khamenei condemned these attacks then it is a direct confirmation from the nr.1 leader in IR.

First scenario is much more likely.

@IR supporters, which option is it? How are you going to spin this?
The only spins are from spider joon-e-vars like jenab-e-alee. 🕷️
 

First I heard of projects flower and crystal; they are a most treacherous bunch indeed and really prove Zand Kermani's comments about them to be true...

Dana should also clarify how come that by his own admission, three out of seven or eight founding members of "Roodast" were Jewish, knowing the tiny percentage of Jewish Iranians among the total population. We'd also be interested in knowing why he promptly rescinded his own statement according to which the current main thinker behind "Roodast" is Jewish as well - how could he possibly be mistaken about the background of someone he's closely been working with for some fifteen years or more? Likewise, why are the background graphics in his show featuring hexagonal shaped objects?

six-pointed-star-from-hexagon-and-triangles-in-outline-style-jewish-star-of-david-like-a.jpg
 
Dana should also clarify how come that by his own admission, three out of seven or eight founding members of "Roodast" were Jewish, knowing the tiny percentage of Jewish Iranians among the total population. We'd also be interested in knowing why he promptly rescinded his own statement according to which the current main thinker behind "Roodast" is Jewish as well - how could he possibly be mistaken about the background of someone he's closely been working with for some fifteen years or more? Likewise, why are the background graphics in his show featuring hexagonal shaped objects?

six-pointed-star-from-hexagon-and-triangles-in-outline-style-jewish-star-of-david-like-a.jpg
Even if Pavlov, Freud and Piaget meet to study this Omid case, they won't reach anything

 
Even if Pavlov, Freud and Piaget meet to study this Omid case, they won't reach anything


True, but I'd advise caution about that article and the obviously sectarianist website it's published at, brother.

Although Dana's rants are inane no doubt, this particular paper is misleading in several ways. Starting with the title: "A sinister alliance between Iranian supremacy and Shiism". Shiaism like every other branch of Islam rejects racial supremacism.

The article is actually endorsing the pretense formulated by some ultra-nationalist Iranians that Shia Islam represents a subversive distortion of authentic Islam. In fact, this is a claim those ultra-nationalist Iranians in question (and it's not a particularly prominent theme among them), and anti-Shia sectarianists are in agreement about. They are united in their joint conviction that Shiaism is but a deviation meant to uproot Islam. Which of course is nonsensical to any believer in Shia Islam, and also to our mainstream Sunni brothers in Islam.

Moreover the author is exaggerating the relevance of this narrative among secular Iranian nationalists. Case in point, Dana for most of his time as a political activist has been taking aim at Shia Islam, its revered figures, its tenets, and its followers. He had been engaging in this kind of drivel from the outset, and he's back at it again since his latest political u-turn last fall.

If he expressed what might have sounded as some "preference" for Shia over Sunni Islam during the intermediate period (which lasted no more than a couple of years), this was merely part of an overall strategy, namely the attempt to broaden the support base of the Islamic Republic so as to include as many non-religious people as possible, in hopes that this would gradually push the political system in Iran to secularize and to move away from Islamic governance and sharia law. That's all there is to his ephemeral, purely tactical "preference" for Shia Islam, which as said has once again given way to intense contempt (listen to any of his videos since last October, they are filled with offensive language against Imams (a.s.) of Shia Islam and Shia mo'menin).

Nowadays Dana is, on the contrary, could be heard defending the oppositionist Sunni cleric molana Abdol-Hamid of Zahedan (which the writer of the article under discussion probably supports too) when the mosque he preaches at on one occasion allowed female visitors regardless of whether or not they would be observing hejab. Dana is recurrently praising the Saudi crown prince Muhammad Bin Salman for his liberal reforms, and going on about how "Shia are more superstitious than Sunnis". Does this mean there's a natural affinity between Iranian ultra-nationalists and Sunni Islam? Of course not. In the same way as there's no natural propensity for said nationalists to associate themselves with Shiaism, something the article clearly obfuscates.

Another issue with the paper is how the statement that Azari Iranians or Arab Iranians are not "ethnically" dissimilar to other Iranians, is seen by the author as a manifestation of "Persian supremacism". Genetic studies have shown this to be true however, so there's nothing supremacist or racist about it. Plus, the fact that the zionist regime is bent on promoting "ethno"-separatism in order to balkanize Iran is also very well documented. Unlike what the article is insinuating therefore, countering this plot is not tantamount to oppressing minorities. Rather, it's an existential imperative for the Islamic government.

There's also a photographic illustration in the article where HezbOllah fighters can be seen performing the Roman salute, next to images of members of the neo-fascist SUMKA party in a similar posture. Which tends to suggest that some sort of an inherent ideological nexus exists between IR-backed Shia Islamic Resistance groups on the one hand and Iranian ultra-nationalism and Nazism on the other. This is incorrect. As you probably know, this salute is still very much practiced by various (para-)military formations across the entire Levant, tracing its roots to Roman tradition rather than German National-Socialism. As for it being specific to Shia Moslems, here's an example of Sunni Moslem Palestinian brothers carrying out the same gesture:

PFLP_Nazi_Salute-1280x640.jpg


The unfounded attempt to draw parallels between Shia Islam and Iranian secular ultra-nationalism is also visible in statements such as the following:

He [Fuladvand] briefly studied Arabic in Egypt and was capable of semi-correctly quoting directly from Arabic books. He wildly quoted from secondary (and even weaker) sources of history (exactly what Shia clerics and polemicists are known for) claiming to have debunked Islam. Many of the gullible Iranian (Shi’ites) followed him into Hellfire.

Not to mention the article's open hostility towards the Islamic Republic, towards Supreme Leader Khamenei, and towards shahid Qasem Soleimani.

So this is definitely a skewed source. But I guess you're aware of it. For users who might not be, the above information would be important to consider.
 
Last edited:
Even if Pavlov, Freud and Piaget meet to study this Omid case, they won't reach anything

What the hell is that obscure conspiracy theory Wahhabi-Yahoodi website

"Persian Supremacist" "Iranian supremacist" "Iranic", these words are hilarious and means strictly nothing
 
IDF Iran Intelligence department gave an overview of their assessment of the recent riots in Iran:
  • Lasted from October 2022 to January 2023
  • Peak of 45,000 protestors/rioters at any one time
  • Protests were "very violent"
  • Protests/opposition lack leadership

Although the protests were geographically dispersed, they were very small in number. By comparison, there are 100,000-200,000 protestors in tiny "Israel" every day, with a peak of around 600,000, despite Iran having 10x the population.
 
IDF Iran Intelligence department gave an overview of their assessment of the recent riots in Iran:
  • Lasted from October 2022 to January 2023
  • Peak of 45,000 protestors/rioters at any one time
  • Protests were "very violent"
  • Protests/opposition lack leadership

Although the protests were geographically dispersed, they were very small in number. By comparison, there are 100,000-200,000 protestors in tiny "Israel" every day, with a peak of around 600,000, despite Iran having 10x the population.
Difference is that they are in charge of a good part of the rest of the world so their internal protests are not nearly as dangerous as the ones in Iran, where dozens of enemies inside and out can take advantage of to inflict a disproportionate amount of damage.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom